View Full Version : Firefox 3 is Gold
Mental Trousers
18th June 2008, 13:02
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
They've launched Firefox 3.0 :2thumbsup
Nordy
18th June 2008, 13:05
thanks for the headsup
TerminalAddict
18th June 2008, 13:12
wine 1.0 (http://www.winehq.org/) .. the same day
Donor
18th June 2008, 13:12
Aye!
Firefox 3 is a work of beauty!
Mental Trousers
18th June 2008, 13:13
wine 1.0 (http://www.winehq.org/) .. the same day
Hell yeah!!
McJim
18th June 2008, 13:14
Wow. Is Clint Eastwood still playing the lead role? :rofl:
Tank
18th June 2008, 13:15
who cares - IE all the way!!!!
p/t - downloaded already.
vindy500
18th June 2008, 13:19
umm welcome to like last week
Tank
18th June 2008, 13:20
What really gets my goat is that MS has written the new version of OWA so that for full functionality you have to use IE.
All other browsers automatically go to OWA light.
grrrrrr
Skunk
18th June 2008, 13:21
Installed. See how it goes. I had changed to Safari 3 on my Mac but I'll try this version for a while.
Donor
18th June 2008, 13:23
umm welcome to like last week
Yeah, nice post.
Firefox 3 was released 0500 NZ time today - please do share your time travel experiences with the rest of us!
Cajun
18th June 2008, 13:27
yeah been running the beta and then the rc for a wee while now,
jolly good program
McJim
18th June 2008, 13:31
Okay, Just downloaded it now. KB looks just the same but the pages take longer to show up.
However this allows me and the missus to both remain logged in at the same time :) :2thumbsup:
vindy500
18th June 2008, 13:32
Yeah, nice post.
Firefox 3 was released 0500 NZ time today - please do share your time travel experiences with the rest of us!
why do i have firefox 3 then?
McJim
18th June 2008, 13:35
why do i have firefox 3 then?
Mibbe you just downloaded it today?
Donor
18th June 2008, 13:37
why do i have firefox 3 then?
Beta version which has been out for a while now?
You're a Mozilla developer?
Using a haxx0red copy?
Accomplished time traveller?
vindy500
18th June 2008, 13:40
must be a beta, but firefox cant find updates? pretty sure it hasnt installed it....
vifferman
18th June 2008, 13:44
Yeah, it doesn't work if you go "Check for updates" - just click on the Mentalness of Trousers linky thingy.
So.
I installed it, but didn't feel anything. Where's the buzz? :confused:
Oh - and it still fucks up the look of my documentation, but at least the javascript behaves now.
Sanx
18th June 2008, 17:07
Opera's up to version 9.5 therefore has to be better than IE & Firefox.
Gubb
18th June 2008, 17:12
Installed it just now. Awesome.
I've just installed 'FoxyMusic' which connects with iTunes and puts a menu bar on the bottom browser for listening to tunes while surfing, and put the Zune Theme on to match the desktop.
Awesome program.
avgas
18th June 2008, 17:15
Opera's up to version 9.5 therefore has to be better than IE & Firefox.
Tell that to Netscap......oh i mean Mozilla Project Team
Slingshot
18th June 2008, 17:39
yeah been running the beta and then the rc for a wee while now,
jolly good program
Me too, probably been running it for at least a month or so. I like the URL bar feature.
PirateJafa
18th June 2008, 17:41
Opera has been better than FF for years - admittedly they have been closing the gap in the last year or two though.
However, FF is still pantloads better than IE.
Bren
18th June 2008, 18:06
I have been using 3.05B since the beta came out...is there any need to upgrade?
Sanx
18th June 2008, 18:11
What really gets my goat is that MS has written the new version of OWA so that for full functionality you have to use IE.
All other browsers automatically go to OWA light.
Considering the staggering amount of AJAX in OWA, MS probably did the right thing. Everyone's implementation of the DOM is very slightly different. As a systems admin, which would you prefer: people getting redirected to Diet OWA is they're using FF / Opera / Safari, etc. or getting 100 support calls a week claiming that OWA's broken?
NighthawkNZ
18th June 2008, 18:33
They've launched Firefox 3.0 :2thumbsup
I been using it for the last 2 or 3 weeks... I may go back to 2.x
TerminalAddict
18th June 2008, 20:21
mmm wonder how many people here are running ubuntu and THINK they already have firefox 3.0 final ???
dpkg -l firefox
will show 3.0-rc1 ... not 3.0
sosman
18th June 2008, 20:25
Wow. Is Clint Eastwood still playing the lead role? :rofl:
Haha nice one :Punk:
Hitcher
18th June 2008, 22:28
Nice. Although I have a couple of add ons to track down now.
Tank
18th June 2008, 22:34
Considering the staggering amount of AJAX in OWA, MS probably did the right thing. Everyone's implementation of the DOM is very slightly different. As a systems admin, which would you prefer: people getting redirected to Diet OWA is they're using FF / Opera / Safari, etc. or getting 100 support calls a week claiming that OWA's broken?
Meh.... thats why I have IT staff ;)
riffer
18th June 2008, 22:35
Well at least the bloody Google toolbar is working again. A recent RC3 instal at home had incurred the wrath of my darling wife due to its wiping it out...
vifferman
19th June 2008, 09:02
Nice. Although I have a couple of add ons to track down now.
It did that for me. :niceone:
mowgli
19th June 2008, 09:06
What really gets my goat is that MS has written the new version of OWA so that for full functionality you have to use IE.
All other browsers automatically go to OWA light.
grrrrrr
How very convenient for MS .......
Badjelly
19th June 2008, 09:34
What really gets my goat is that MS has written the new version of OWA so that for full functionality you have to use IE.
All other browsers automatically go to OWA light.
What is this OWA of which you speak?
Hitcher
19th June 2008, 09:38
It did that for me.
It has now done that for me as well. I had a couple that auto detect thingie for some reason couldn't find. But that's all sorted.
I have yet to find anything that is particularly significant about V3.0, other that some wizzier cosmetics?
riffer
19th June 2008, 09:42
What is this OWA of which you speak?
Outlook Web Access.
It allows you to interface with your company's Exchange server offsite.
vifferman
19th June 2008, 09:42
I have yet to find anything that is particularly significant about V3.0, other that some wizzier cosmetics?
It doesn't particularly wizz my cosmetics. And it does a crap job with my HTML Help doco - mebbe there's some setting somewhere what'll fix it, but I can't be bothered.
But the price was right.
So... I use the horrible IE7 for my doco, and the tewwibly twendy FF for everything else. Because I can. :rolleyes:
vifferman
19th June 2008, 09:45
Outlook Web Access.
It allows you to interface with your company's Exchange server offsite.
Isn't that what the various webmails are for? Our "company's Exchange server" has a webmail address we can use instead. Dunno how it works (some black voodoo magic?) but it does.
Or I can used RDP or whatever it's called and just access my PC from home or the Sarf of France oir whereever. (As if...)
riffer
19th June 2008, 09:49
OWA ain't just about email. You also have access to any shared calendars, contact lists, and sharepoint services, infopath forms etc.
As for RDP using Remote Desktop Control, meh, I use LogmeIn. Much better, and easier to implement without getting down on bended knees to IT.
Tank
19th June 2008, 10:07
Isn't that what the various webmails are for? Our "company's Exchange server" has a webmail address we can use instead. Dunno how it works (some black voodoo magic?) but it does.
Or I can used RDP or whatever it's called and just access my PC from home or the Sarf of France oir whereever. (As if...)
OWA ain't just about email. You also have access to any shared calendars, contact lists, and sharepoint services, infopath forms etc.
As for RDP using Remote Desktop Control, meh, I use LogmeIn. Much better, and easier to implement without getting down on bended knees to IT.
I think he meant RPC not RDC - you can use RPC over HTTP allowing you to use the full outlook client over port 80 - no VPC's etc required.
only issue for us is that some of our clients block this - ahh the joys of extremely security aware clients.
edit: fuck I sound like a nerd. ummmmm so Im off to drink beer and shag strippers.
vifferman
19th June 2008, 10:15
Much better, and easier to implement without getting down on bended knees to IT.
Don't have to do that - because the ability to work from home (or further afield) is a company policy, it's already set up.
edit: fuck I sound like a nerd. ummmmm so Im off to drink beer and shag strippers.
Quite right.
Mental Trousers
19th June 2008, 10:16
Opera's up to version 9.5 therefore has to be better than IE & Firefox.
That just means they had to rewrite it more often :msn-wink:
I been using it for the last 2 or 3 weeks... I may go back to 2.x
v3.0 seems much less buggy than the release candidates. Update and try v3.0 before going back.
Nice. Although I have a couple of add ons to track down now.
As is normal, more than half of the addons I use aren't working now. Even more typical, they're the addons that I use heaps.
So, obviously a trip to Mozilla's Firefox addons site was in order to try and locate updates that weren't found automatically. 10 addons installed later and I still haven't found updates for 9/10 that were broken.
This is my Firefox updating story everytime ..... :blank:
It doesn't particularly wizz my cosmetics. And it does a crap job with my HTML Help doco - mebbe there's some setting somewhere what'll fix it, but I can't be bothered.
But the price was right.
So... I use the horrible IE7 for my doco, and the tewwibly twendy FF for everything else. Because I can. :rolleyes:
Use IE tab in Firefox. Either that or go get Maxthon (uses the IE rendering engine) or Opera.
Big Dave
19th June 2008, 10:30
Doesn't make any real difference but so far I'm not impressed.
On OSX 10.4.11 - Image downloads are sometimes flakey, it moves the folders on my desktop if I save to them, and the flash player is not as reliable. It still runs out of memory once a session.
Edit/ And the new Bookmaring system blows chunks.
Strang0r
19th June 2008, 10:33
I miss my addons :( Hope they get updated soon...
vifferman
19th June 2008, 10:42
Use IE tab in Firefox. Either that or go get Maxthon (uses the IE rendering engine) or Opera.
It's not quite as simple as that - I have to think about what our thousands of customers are most likely to use.:rolleyes:
Most of tem are liekly to go with IE, just because that's what their computer dudes will tell them (and because we're a Micro$slob partner, software house or whatever).
So... I've told them that the doco was optimised for IE, but will work for FF, Netscape etc. and documented what is different about them (means I have multiple browsers installed on my PC just to do a few screendumps and some testing).
Winston001
19th June 2008, 13:01
Opera has been better than FF for years - admittedly they have been closing the gap in the last year or two though.
However, FF is still pantloads better than IE.
Been using FF3 Beta for about a month and I like it.
I have an affection for Opera but there were a few sites I couldn't use plus a software conflict so.....
FF with some extensions achieves the same as Opera so all good. The FF extensions are being updated for 3 - just be patient.
Hitcher
20th June 2008, 21:17
FF3 doesn't let you sort your bookmarks anymore. In FF2, if you right-mouse clicked your bookmarks list, there was a sort option. No more. FF3 has a Bookmarks/Organise bookmarks/View/sort option with a whole bunch of alleged sorting options that make absolutely no difference to what gets displayed.
Crap!
Big Dave
21st June 2008, 21:35
I've been using it all week.
A long list of stuff - including my .mac photo galleries don't work on it.
On a mac it's the worst software upgrade I have encountered in the last 10 years.
I'm back to using Safari.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.