Antonie Dixon re-trial - machete slasher fu*kwitt

[firefighter]

The fuckers guilty why a retrial????!!!!! what for??? put the piece of shit down for fucks sake, and forget this second chance shit, his victims haven't had one and iv'e manged to never slice anyone up on a "p" fuelled rampage!!!

[Headbanger]

Yep, Just kill him. Do it quietly, No fanfare, Just pull that prison van up on the side of the road, Find a good strong tree, and hang him until he is dead.

I wonder what the cost of his actions in monetary terms is currently at? Money that would have been far better spent on a worthwhile cause.

[firefighter]

Yep, Just kill him. Do it quietly, No fanfare, Just pull that prison van up on the side of the road, Find a good strong tree, and hang him until he is dead.

I wonder what the cost of his actions in monetary terms is currently at? Money that would have been far better spent on a worthwhile cause.

exactly, put him down the cheapest way possible.......

[Qkchk]

What an absolute waste of oxygen on that prick.

20 cents worth of lead will save the taxpayer $100,000's per year.

EDIT: Opps, I voted the wrong one, should of been "Bullet in the Head"

[oldrider]

Put the fucker down, only the legal profession is winning with pricks like him. :yes:

[mowgli]

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell :devil2:

[Qkchk]

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P.

Tough shit.

You take the drug, you pay the price.

[Mr Merde]

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell :devil2:


By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either

[mowgli]

By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either
Maybe they mean not guilty of murder, but guilty of the lesser crime of manslaughter. Either way - burn them :devil2:

[Hitcher]

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

[HenryDorsetCase]

If I recall correctly, intoxication is a mitigation factor, not an excuse. Its been a looooooong time since I did LAWS204 Criminal Law though.

I am also interested in the question of why the convictions were overturned in the first place, and the reasons for suppression. I see they've also just discharged the jury. Fascinating.

Also, aren't most lawyers shit on TV? Like, dude, get some media training if you are going to be on the telly, at least give us some entertainment FFS.

I am totally with you people who want to put two 9mm rounds in Mr Dick-sons temple though.

[James Deuce]

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?
No, no, no, we must Kangaroo Court ourselves to an insensible conclusion first!

[firefighter]

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

NOPE!!! the guys guilty, why else would he have been trying to prove insanity instead of just saying it wasn't me? No matter the reason, there is no excuse for spending thousands on this retrial.....although if i'm honest I do want to know why our dollars are being spent on a re-trial- perhaps adding more murder charges?ohhh wait no they'll shorten his sentence...maybe 2 years on good behaviour.<_<

[MisterD]

No, no, no, we must Kangaroo Court ourselves to an insensible conclusion first!

It's a waste of time and money - his counsel aren't disputing he did it so either:

a) He's a murdering bastard and we lock him up and throw away the key, or

b) He's an unhinged violent nutcase and we lock him up and throw away the key...

[Gubb]

"I smoked P, and I didn't cut anybody's hands off!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21ap75pTveU

[Forest]

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?

The real reason for the retrial can be summed up in two words...

Legal Aid.

[Hitcher]

Possibly. There may be some point of law that the Courts are seeking clarification on. But let's not speculate. All will become clear in due course.

[oldrider]

Years ago it used to be an excuse if you were pissed and had an accident while driving a vehicle.

The law was changed but traffic officers of the day had no power of arrest.

The MOT and Police were amalgamated to accommodate this, if my memory is correct.

There were other economies claimed as well of course but the above was the driving force.

I don't see how anyone can claim innocent because of the influence of any other substance either.

I am getting sick of these pricks getting off on the most infantile of reasons and at our expense. (legal aid) Correct me if I am wrong please. :confused: Cheers John.

[Brutus]

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell :devil2:

The Panmure triple(?) murderer was also on P. He was found guilty. why bother with this moron. A precedent has already been set regarding the use of when committing crime. Lawyers!!! making work for themselves.
A mutual verbal masturbation apreciation society!!

[Pedrostt500]

Ah so how is his lawer suposed to get the new top of the line BMW, FFS last years model is already six months old, a retrial will mean that his poor down troden lawer will get his new car.

[Robbo]

Shoot the Fucker. He's no better than a mad dog and needs to be put down. :2guns:

[skidMark]

exactly, put him down the cheapest way possible.......


Lead is expensive man.

[ynot slow]

Put all the "P" convicted arseholes in jail,maybe a big courtyard,give them shitloads of the drug and let them go,by the time they have killed each other,and the last couple are coming too,shoot them,no worries.

[rottiguy]

"smoked some weed and didn't cough, I smoked P and I didn't cut anyones hands off"

[rottiguy]

blaming the drugs is like blaming a speeding ticket on your bike, dickheads are dickheads no matter what substance they might be taking at the time. I don't do P but there are thousands of people all around the country that do every weekend and none of them go crazy.
Just Like that Graeme burton dickwad, just got their brain wired up wrong.

[SPman]

exactly, put him down the cheapest way possible.......
What - take him out on an ATNR with the KB crowd......:eek:

[Manxman]

The real reason for the retrial can be summed up in two words...

Legal Aid.

The two words I was thinking of were:

Barry Hart

[monkey99]

:eek:Why not for those that have committed such heinous crimes:jerry:Heinous ~ gr8 word:Offtopic:

Freeze them..:niceone:put them in cryo suspension & then make all the evidence available on blogs, radio, papers so we can all debate & review the information to figure out better ways to stop these social dipshits for existing!!

we can unfreeze them when the technology to re animate is discovered..then put them down after 100 years of debate:eek: maybe just drop the crimsicle from a gr8 height?!

maybe we need to have a license to have kids?:Police: problem being is some piggies might give you a ticket for speeding:second:

[raftn]

Poor guy give him a break, he probably got smacked when he was a kid and that is why he is like he is.........now that we have Sue, the next generation will all behave them selves.............nah fuck it just leave him at white island for a couple of months!

[awayatc]

Society is like a garden, You can nourish and water the plants all you like,
But if you don't stay on top of the weeds, all your efforts are in vain.....

It seems to me we need new gardeners soon......:apint:

[alanzs]

Assuming he is guilty. He deserves nothing less than what he did to his victims. No excuses accepted, no leniency given; off with his head. :yes:

[firefighter]

Assuming he is guilty. He deserves nothing less than what he did to his victims. No excuses accepted, no leniency given; off with his head. :yes:

Yep he's definately guilty....no question.

[glice]

I'm with putting him down. and any other worthless shits that do similar crimes. eye for an eye.

[Patrick]

I may have mis-heard the news but aren't they trying to argue that he's not guilty by reason of intoxication on P. Unless the drugs (and alcohol?) were forced down his neck against his will then this is no excuse. Who invented this loophole? Burn them aswell :devil2:

Think they are trying the insanity reason as opposed to the guilty as sin murderous intent... Lock him away with the criminally insane :whocares:- he will become one of them after a while... some real weird ones in secure psyche wards that he will be associating with - ones that will chop ya nuts off with a rusty tin can bacause the voices told him to...


By that reasoning anyone who has been convicted of drink driving isnt guilty either

Quite right - no one made them do it....


The real reason for the retrial can be summed up in two words...

Legal Aid.

"Hitting the nail on the head" is the phrase I believe you are after...


Years ago it used to be an excuse if you were pissed and had an accident while driving a vehicle.

The law was changed but traffic officers of the day had no power of arrest.

The MOT and Police were amalgamated to accommodate this, if my memory is correct.

There were other economies claimed as well of course but the above was the driving force.

They only had limited powers of arrest - they could lock up drunks and disqualified drivers, but not those arses that assaulted them.

Other economics - maybe, but the main factor was that there are few contries left in the world where Police and Traffic were completely seperate law enforcement entities. Hence the merger, back in 1992. It won't change back for those same economic reasons.....

[Danboy]

Definitely eye for an eye. He seemed to like sharp blades and chopping things off, how about he gets the same done to him? His victim had no say in it, so neither should he. Fuck, fraudsters get harsher treatment than murderers these days!! System's all gone to fuck. Too PC for my liking. Once you've committed a crime of this magnitude and it's 100% proven you committed said crime, you should have no rights, therefore no legal aid and no say.

[Skyryder]

The MOT and Police were amalgamated to accommodate this, if my memory is correct.


It was John Bank's way of increasing the police numbers. He had made and election promise on this but never informed the public on what he was going to do. Both the police and the MOT were against the move, but since when did Banks listen to anybody but his own mouth.

Skyryder

[Maffoo]

i know one of the girls he sliced up

& he's definitely guilty

[young1]

His victims never got a chance so why should this a$$hole!

[spudchucka]

Does anybody actually believe the crap this guy is spouting from the dock?

He is f*%ked in the head if he thinks that performance is going to save his sorry arse but not in a way that makes him not guilty of murder.

[carver]

The fuckers guilty why a retrial????!!!!! what for??? put the piece of shit down for fucks sake, and forget this second chance shit, his victims haven't had one and iv'e manged to never slice anyone up on a "p" fuelled rampage!!!

you quite clearly dont know shit.

the girls gave him the drugs
the warehouse was used to strip stolen cars
the girls sneaked in a larger dose, and it was not just meth!
they kinda got what was coming to them

[awayatc]

you quite clearly dont know shit.



Is that an expert opinion?....Glad to hear from somebody who knows shit....:innocent::scooter:

[Qkchk]

Does anybody actually believe the crap this guy is spouting from the dock?

He is f*%ked in the head if he thinks that performance is going to save his sorry arse but not in a way that makes him not guilty of murder.

But god told him to do it........ :weird:

Always gotta blame someone else but themselves.

[Skyryder]

But god told him to do it........ :weird:

Always gotta blame someone else but themselves.


He'd be more believable if he claimed the Devil spoke to him. All he's gota do is play the TBN channel to the jury for proof. Now there's an idea may be he could get 'Joyce' as an expert witness on the subject of the Devil. She's coming out here soon to preach. :spanking:


Skyryder

[peasea]

you quite clearly dont know shit.

the girls gave him the drugs
the warehouse was used to strip stolen cars
the girls sneaked in a larger dose, and it was not just meth!
they kinda got what was coming to them


The girls gave him the drugs: He chose to take them.
The warehouse was used to strip stiolen cars: Put them all in jail.
The girls sneaked in a larger dose etc: Lucky him.
They kinda got what was coming to them: You live by the sword etc etc....

I happen to know an ex-copper who worked on that case and he's convinced there's not a lot wrong with the insides of this cock's skull, rather he's playing everyone like fiddles.

When you take illicit drugs you're taking a risk because the dosage varies wildly (in my experience) and there is also a risk of infection in certain circumstances. I doubt anyone forced this twat to take drugs and to use drugs (including alcohol) as an excuse for any crime is crap. If this lot was involved in a car theft/stripping ring (or ignoring it while they were on the premises) then I say jail the lot of them. It's too easy to get away with car theft in NZ, it sucks. Generally speaking a motor vehicle is a persons second biggest asset, sometimes their only asset. To lose it is often devastaing.

Sneaking drugs into somebody's drink, meal, syringe, whatever (or adding to already unkown doses) is bloody dangerous and could kill. If those girls did that then lock them up for that alone.

Why this trial has gone ahead I don't know but I sincerely hope it culminates in a bunch of cell time for those who deserve it.

[oldrider]

There is a lot of oxygen being wasted by these people! :doh: John. (Till death do us part has a nice ring to it here)

[Patrick]

you quite clearly dont know shit.

the girls gave him the drugs
the warehouse was used to strip stolen cars
the girls sneaked in a larger dose, and it was not just meth!
they kinda got what was coming to them

Wrong there carver.... Never a clearer case. He is shit, not clay.

He is telling them to say, now, that his drink was spiked by them... TUI....!!!!

He has been a paranoid P taker for a looooonnnnnng time - way before this event. The girls, if they gave him drugs, gave him his own drugs, with him being a more than willing participant.

Who cares what the warehouse was used for...

They kinda got what was coming? Perhaps. Still doesn't change anything though.

See qkchks avatar above - he played along looking like that for a long time, right up until he was found guilty, then normal service was resumed, instantly.

Playing along? Too right.

Lawyer in it for the money?????

Hmmmm......... Too right?????

[Pussy]

Oxygen thief

[Madness]

Guilty on all counts. What a feckin suprise.

[NOMIS]

alot of you on here talk tough. saying " ahh kill him" bla bla bla friging blaa. Yes he quitly of murder but how many of you could look him in the eye and go through with killing him? yeh all right to go anmd say it but how many would take it apon themselves to do it?

All fine and dandy , yes NZ sucks with its legal system everyone knows that nothing new. I wouldnt kill him unless one person asked me to that he just happens to be saying told him to do the killings Physco..

[scumdog]

How about we just wait and see what the reasons for a retrial are?


Fuck the retrial already, just burn the fucker.

[Pussy]

I see tonight on the news that the arsewipe has been found guilty of the eight charges. Good fucken job

[Patrick]

He wants to appeal now... Great... More fucken taxpayer money wasted on this sack of shit.

[R6_kid]

Yes he's guitly of murder but how many of you could look him in the eye and go through with killing him?

Give me the gun?

Too much taxpayer money is being wasted on people like him. If proven guilty on two separate occasions, why then does he need to be given a third chance to prove he was 'insane'... he wasn't insane, he was on P. No different to being very drunk and doing some dumb shit that ends up killing people.

The cost of a bullet will save the tax payers of this country more than $60k per year that he is in jail, it may also serve as a lesson to the rest of the shit lickers in this country that the rest of the population is sick of them and couldnt care less if they didnt exist.

[screamer]

He wants to appeal now... Great... More fucken taxpayer money wasted on this sack of shit.

Will they let him appeal it a second time.

[ambler]

Will they let him appeal it a second time.

As I understand it, the case was returned to the original court because of misconduct by the presiding judge, so there has not been an appeal in the proper sense. Given that this is expected to waste close to a million dollars of taxpayer money, the high court is not proclaiming this fact too loudly. Not to mention the bad light it casts on their court and its staff, and how deserving they are of our trust....
Incidentally, this is the same judge who caused so much anguish for the guy who was jailed for keeping his website up - see: http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/showthread.php?t=78977

[candor]

Having worked with plenty of criminally insane killers in psych wards I've never known one to be proud and organised enough to put up a fame seeking website with the nickname "samurai". This is a mere "dime a dozen" deviate narcissist control freak with an appetite for celebrity and recognition. He'll be loving this thread. Along with the 3% of the population with similarly beautiful personality make up. P plus plonker equals plonker plus. Without being under the influence he'd prolly have only sought fame by taking 1 victim. Fake balls.

[spudchucka]

He wants to appeal now... Great... More fucken taxpayer money wasted on this sack of shit.

You mean the lawyer right?

[spudchucka]

Will they let him appeal it a second time.

Its a new conviction, the first one was quashed.

[peasea]

You mean the lawyer right?

Couldn't have said it better myself; if you think the Mongrel Mob are a bunch of lowlife, thieving scumbags try hiring a lawyer!

[peasea]

Give me the gun?

Too much taxpayer money is being wasted on people like him. If proven guilty on two separate occasions, why then does he need to be given a third chance to prove he was 'insane'... he wasn't insane, he was on P. No different to being very drunk and doing some dumb shit that ends up killing people.

The cost of a bullet will save the tax payers of this country more than $60k per year that he is in jail, it may also serve as a lesson to the rest of the shit lickers in this country that the rest of the population is sick of them and couldnt care less if they didnt exist.

So, Lord High Executioner, what sort of salary would you be looking for?

[_Shrek_]

alot of you on here talk tough. saying " ahh kill him" bla bla bla friging blaa. Yes he quitly of murder but how many of you could look him in the eye and go through with killing him? yeh all right to go and say it but how many would take it apon themselves to do it?

"Me" :yeah:

[_Shrek_]

Fuck the retrial already, just burn the fucker.

not how I would say it, but you on the right track :2guns: would be better


Give me the gun?

Too much taxpayer money is being wasted on people like him. If proven guilty on two separate occasions, why then does he need to be given a third chance to prove he was 'insane'... he wasn't insane, he was on P. No different to being very drunk and doing some dumb shit that ends up killing people.

The cost of a bullet will save the tax payers of this country more than $60k per year that he is in jail, it may also serve as a lesson to the rest of the shit lickers in this country that the rest of the population is sick of them and couldnt care less if they didnt exist.

"Bling" & "Bling"

[James Deuce]

Hey! He's already dead.

[_Shrek_]

Hey! He's already dead.

:laugh: save me from having to do it, mmmmmmm just saw the date :doh:

[been_there]

Why the fuck do we have to end up paying for this!!!
This guy needs the death penalty:ar15: ...I don't give a shit what this guy was on.

He did what he did. It was all his choice.
No excuses please:2guns:


EDIT:
FUCKING FORGOT HE IS DEAD OWELL I FEEL MUCH BETTER NOW...RANT OVER AND OUT

[Skyryder]

Hey! He's already dead.


I think he butted himself to death. Not a nice way to go but in this case appropiate I think.


Skyryder