Log in

View Full Version : Oils ain't oils.



tri boy
25th June 2008, 20:08
http://www.peterverdonedesigns.com/lowspeed.htm
Good read for those who wish to compare fork oils. Chart at the bottom is telling.:sunny:
A point that I noted is that most damper rod type forks like c/stroke34ish, so basically ATF Mobil could be used, but obviously not the top end oil with regards to corrosion resistance etc.
Definitely not the choice for cartridge units though.
I will leave it for the experts to comment.

Pussy
25th June 2008, 21:40
That's a good link... cheers tri boy :D

pete376403
25th June 2008, 22:33
Whats ATF lacking in corrosion resistance? I've rebuilt plenty of automatic transmissions and never seen a one rusty inside (unless the trans cooler in the bottom of the radiator has failed.
Shouldn't be any water in the forks anyway...

Robert Taylor
25th June 2008, 23:08
Whats ATF lacking in corrosion resistance? I've rebuilt plenty of automatic transmissions and never seen a one rusty inside (unless the trans cooler in the bottom of the radiator has failed.
Shouldn't be any water in the forks anyway...

Condensation is a big factor

Robert Taylor
25th June 2008, 23:12
http://www.peterverdonedesigns.com/lowspeed.htm
Good read for those who wish to compare fork oils. Chart at the bottom is telling.:sunny:
A point that I noted is that most damper rod type forks like c/stroke34ish, so basically ATF Mobil could be used, but obviously not the top end oil with regards to corrosion resistance etc.
Definitely not the choice for cartridge units though.
I will leave it for the experts to comment.

We have a very high quality Ohlins oil we are now using in many damper rod forks, 35 cst @40 degrees C. But without launching into a tirade of detail about ambient temperature sensitivity there are so many variables with these forks that especially affects rebound return speed. There is so much uncontrolled bleed caused by poor tolerancing, also very often by poor assembly alignment of the damper rod itself. The detail ( or lack thereof ) can make a HUGE difference.

CookMySock
26th June 2008, 09:13
We have a very high quality Ohlins oil we are now using in many damper rod forks, 35 cst @40 degrees C. What is its' viscosity index ? What is the base stock ?

DB

Badjelly
26th June 2008, 09:36
Thanks for that, mate. I'd been wondering how viscosity index was calculated. Now I know:

VI = 100+(10^(LN((EXP(1.0727+0.6175*LN(cSt@100)+0.9744* (LN(cSt@100)^2)+(-0.3764)*(LN(cSt@100)^3)+0.04824*(LN(cSt@100)^4)))/cSt@40)/LN(cSt@100))-1)/0.00715

Robert Taylor
26th June 2008, 10:29
What is its' viscosity index ? What is the base stock ?

DB

V1 445 Highly refined mineral base stock. Very slippery, low friction.

CookMySock
26th June 2008, 11:24
V1 445 Highly refined mineral base stock. Very slippery, low friction.Very Nice. Makes everything else look like carrot juice.

DB

Robert Taylor
27th June 2008, 09:17
Very Nice. Makes everything else look like carrot juice.

DB

The VI figure I quoted was wrong, after I went in and scrolled through a plethora of manufacturers spec cards last night. The manufacturer of most of Ohlins oils is a state owned Norwegian company Statoil. Something has been lost in translation Norwegian / Swedish / English. The 445 figure I quoted was a reference figure to something else that is printed in Norwegian. I will request this and see what bounces back but dont hold your breath.
I note with interest that 2 companies, both Ohlins and WP are not as forthcoming with full info, maybe they are protective because of commercial sensitivity etc. But both companies are at the very top of the tree with the quality of their suspension so I have absolutely no doubt that the oils they use and specify are commensurate with the performance of the product.
I can certainly vouch from my own experience that the Ohlins oil we are now almost exclusively using is very very good.
There is also a very serious factual inaccuracy in the article that Triboy refers to. It is stated that one part number of Ohlins oil is used for Ohlins shocks, nothing could be further from the truth. There are in fact THREE different specifications for Ohlins shocks and the correct specification is detailed for each individual shock on the spec card for that shock. That is one of the many reasons why they should only be serviced by accredited service technicians who have the appropriate training and knowledge of the product. Beware of ''imitators'' who in fact have no specific training whatsoever, have never heard about centistroke ratings and will carelessly use something else that is not really appropriate. Oils aint oils.....

CookMySock
27th June 2008, 09:52
I'm trying hard not to be an arse here, but many companies will not release specs on their product because they would rather have everyone follow their word blindly. This leaves their advertising material full of persuasion techniques that have no real basis in science.

DB

Robert Taylor
27th June 2008, 21:01
I'm trying hard not to be an arse here, but many companies will not release specs on their product because they would rather have everyone follow their word blindly. This leaves their advertising material full of persuasion techniques that have no real basis in science.

DB

I can very well understand why many consumers have developed a cynical and less than convinced attitude to many product claims. You buy a product and base some of your judgement on the pr hype, only to end up being bitterly disappointed because it just hasnt lived up to expectations and / or is not actually fit for the purpose for which it was sold. As an over-generalisation I would suggest that many budget priced products are the worst offenders.
In the world of suspension there used to be a slogan for a budget product entitled ''dial a ride'' May I suggest that many consumers must have ended up thinking this is actually about dialing in the degree of backache they are going to feel! And in all languages I would hasten to add that the word Quality is now one of the most mis-used words. The sad thing is that for many the perception of quality has been incessantly dumbed down.
In going in to bat for top shelf companies such as Ohlins and WP I would suggest ( and actually know it to be true ) that their major pre-requisite in everything they do is quality. I dont think there is anything sinister in these very companies being a little protective of specifications. And as I recall in excess of 10% of the worlds economy is piracy / copyright infringement, 70% or greater of that comes from ( you guessed it ) mainland Asia. Indeed Ohlins have a member of their staff dealing with this full time.
I think one of the biggest areas where you can often be misled is magazine tests, especially in a small country. The magazine owners will be ''economical with the truth'' as it would be an ''inconvenient truth'' to say it how it really was. They are competing for advertising dollars. Masterminds of brainwashing such as Joseph Goebbels must be laughing in their graves.
I dont blame you for questioning in a world full of those who blindly follow.

svr
27th June 2008, 22:39
II think one of the biggest areas where you can often be misled is magazine tests, especially in a small country. The magazine owners will be ''economical with the truth'' as it would be an ''inconvenient truth'' to say it how it really was. They are competing for advertising dollars. Masterminds of brainwashing such as Joseph Goebbels must be laughing in their graves.
I dont blame you for questioning in a world full of those who blindly follow.

What passes for motorcycle `journalism' in this country is a total joke. I have not read a reasonable, clear, critical evaluation of any product (or topic, actually) in 30 yrs of reading NZ motorcycle `literature'. I assumed the reason was general motorcycling and intellectual incompetence, but it seems there is also a commercial explanation.
Thanks for the missing piece to the puzzle.

CookMySock
28th June 2008, 08:23
You buy a product and base some of your judgement on the pr hype [....]Not any more.


but it seems there is also a commercial explanation. "commercial explanation" - I like that. Another word for "spin" ?

cue - telecom advert..


DB

riffer
28th June 2008, 09:38
There's some interesting reading there, and it's helped me understand a bit what's happened with my forks.

You see, I've had a problem for the last 18 months with the bike having a small shudder under braking which wasn't reflected in a pulsing in the brake lever.

I've rebuilt the steering head, rebuilt the brakes and changed the oil in the forks at least three times. I've had the dialout on the rotors measured to ensure they were straight but to no avail.

Until recently. I blew another fork seal on the forks (it's a common event) and had a good talk with the bike shop who speculated that the fork oil I was using wasn't working with my riding technique and suggested I change to Spectro Golden 85/150, which is a much lighter oil than the Spectro 10wt I was using (and also is exclusively for cartridge forks).

Looking at the chart it seems the cold viscosity of the 10wt was 32.80 and warm was 5.60 with a VI of 111.

And the Golden 85/10 was 3.82 and 16.90, with a VI of 150.

Now, with the 85/150 I'm using two more clicks of preload as it's a bit softer at lighter preload being a less weight oil, but the difference is staggering. Particularly at lower speed. There's a lot more movement there. The forks would just crash over the bumps before and I'd get a bit of headshake accelerating hard out of corners in 2nd gear (RF's are not known for their light front ends too). Now it smooths out the bumps a lot better, and best of all, there's not a trace of the brake shudder any more.

This is a bit of a relevation to me, that the fork oil can affect braking. I'm guessing that the fork oil wasn't moving smoothly through the valves and shim stacks (I'm still not au fait with all the workings of the hidden components inside the cartridges as I've never dismantled the cartridges) and was causing some kind of hydraulic lock when the forks were moving quickly, like under the load that braking would cause on a front-heavy bike on rough roads. Although shudder seemed to be found at all speeds and even on smooth roads so I think the cartridges just didn't like the oil.

I'm not convinced of the benefits of spending $1000 on a $5000 bike to get optimum suspension performance at the front end, however I am curious as to the effect an oil with an even high VI would give in terms of consistency of performance at different temperatures. Upper Hutt can change a lot over the course of the year. I change fork oil in winter and summer so it could be that I could use a different oil for the summer to winter.

Am I on the right track here?

AllanB
28th June 2008, 09:54
Sorry all I read was bla bla bla.

I'm still farting around with small preload adjustments etc and now that article tells me I can't even go to my local bike shop and presume the fork oil the parts guy sells me will be the best for my Hornet :shit:

When I'm ready to change my fork oil, for the $10 courier cost I think I'll just PM Robert Taylor and ask him to send me down a suitable oil. At least I KNOW he knows his trade.

CookMySock
28th June 2008, 10:34
yeah I'm wondering if my front suspension could just do with a lighter oil in it, coz its rough as crap. Spring rate is way to high on the rear, and there isn't much I can do about that - cant change the spring in it, bugger all else fits, and I'm not in the market for a quality replacement. grump.

DB

Robert Taylor
28th June 2008, 13:29
Sorry all I read was bla bla bla.

I'm still farting around with small preload adjustments etc and now that article tells me I can't even go to my local bike shop and presume the fork oil the parts guy sells me will be the best for my Hornet :shit:

When I'm ready to change my fork oil, for the $10 courier cost I think I'll just PM Robert Taylor and ask him to send me down a suitable oil. At least I KNOW he knows his trade.

Let me make it abundantly clear that there is absolutely no intention to alienate dealers out of the equation, I was in effect pointing out a major failing of retailing in general. Too many people selling product that have woefully inadequate product knowledge. As for me personally, well I belong to an age where there was more specialistaion and many shopkeepers truly knew their product, in many ways the march of ''progress'' has had many detrimental affects.

Back to oils...........certainly the oil should have great temperature stability, lubricity, flow characteristics etc but it is not by any means a magic cure all. Oil viscosity primarily has its greatest affect through smaller orifices i.e bypass bleed before the shim stacks open. When those shim stacks do open oil viscosity has a much diminished affect. Thats for cartridge type forks with speed sensitive damping. If the fundamental character of the damping is not right no amount of messing around with oil viscosity is going to cure the problem!!
With the nasty damper rod forks that we still have in many bikes you tune rebound speed by oil viscosity as the nature of the damping is progressive through a fixed orifice.

AllanB
28th June 2008, 14:19
Let me make it abundantly clear that there is absolutely no intention to alienate dealers out of the equation

Hi Robert - I did not take it that way - if fact I agree 100% with you - I expect the parts person or at least someone in the bike shop to have a very good knowledge of what they are selling me. Sadly this is becoming a thing of the past in most retail domains in NZ.

Thus my comment regarding preferring to pay extra for shipping to CHCH from someone who has the relevant knowledge.

Its just a shame I don't have a few K spare for the other goodies you stock :drool:

JD Racing
1st July 2008, 21:15
Don't get too carried away with the VI rating of oils, it's important but it's not unheard of for companies to add certain polymers that boost the VI rating but then break down very quickly when used, the VI rating is only part of the picture.
I don't believe that by not divulging information companies are protecting their products, I also suspect they are hiding something.
If I go out in my garden shed and blend an oil with a viscosity rating of 450 a specific gravity of 0.8 list a four ball wear and foam test and so on and also state the test standards that it was tested to I'm giving absolutely nothing away apart from test results. What base stock, additives the quantities are all unknown.
If I'm wanting to make an informed choice on oil then I want as much information as possible beforehand as I don't have the luxury of a full chemical lab, I can read up on the test procedures as they are all published and then do some real world testing.

CookMySock
1st July 2008, 22:11
it's not unheard of for companies to add certain polymers that boost the VI rating but then break down very quickly when usedThat is actually very common with engine oils. There is only one ENGINE oil that I know of that has no VI improvers.



If I go out in my garden shed and blend an oil with a viscosity rating of 450 a specific gravity of 0.8 list a four ball wear and foam test and so on and also state the test standards that it was tested to I'm giving absolutely nothing away apart from test results.Yeah its a lot easier to build oils to pass tests than it is to do a good job.


DB

Robert Taylor
2nd July 2008, 10:35
Don't get too carried away with the VI rating of oils, it's important but it's not unheard of for companies to add certain polymers that boost the VI rating but then break down very quickly when used, the VI rating is only part of the picture.
I don't believe that by not divulging information companies are protecting their products, I also suspect they are hiding something.
If I go out in my garden shed and blend an oil with a viscosity rating of 450 a specific gravity of 0.8 list a four ball wear and foam test and so on and also state the test standards that it was tested to I'm giving absolutely nothing away apart from test results. What base stock, additives the quantities are all unknown.
If I'm wanting to make an informed choice on oil then I want as much information as possible beforehand as I don't have the luxury of a full chemical lab, I can read up on the test procedures as they are all published and then do some real world testing.

Fair comments, the real world testing is indeed a good indicator. We have tried a lot of oils over the years and have been very disappointed with many.
But I think it would be a bit of a blanket statement that manufacturers at large are hiding something if all the specs are not forthcoming.

FilthyLuka
2nd July 2008, 11:07
VI improved


Please keep all posts on topic, open source text editors have nothing to do with oils....

:shifty:

hehehehe