NOT GUILTY - dangerous speed

[NOMIS]

Hey guys some of you may remember I was arested because a cop heard my motorbike acelerate at daangerous speed earlier this year, have had my second defendant hearing and was found not guitly due to lack of evidence im glad that I was not put on the stand as I was not interested in answering questions by the prosecutor.

So good out come in all. After spending 6 hours in court we finally got it sorted. Its not just tax returns that goverment agencies are slow with..

any ways back to biking, just have to watch that throtle hand

[NOMIS]

CAN A MOD PLEASE CORRECT MY TYPO ERROR ON THE THREAD HEADING, I can spell dangerous.

and to the Cop who obviously passed my "court on monday" thread to The arresting constable... lame.... How was I mean't to know. didn't even get brought up you P***** , why try throw that into the mix? any way over now.

[MadDuck]

arested, copa, acelerate, daangerous, guitly, doc, spendinf, governement,throtle


CAN A MOD PLEASE CORRECT MY TYPO ERROR ON THE THREAD HEADING, I can spell dangerous.

Please take this with the humour in which it is intended but I found this very funny indeed. I think its not just the heading thats an issue.

[AndyOnTheFlyingBrick]

glad you got off! just remember to keep the wrist relaxed lol! so I take it he did not see you speeding, just heard you slamming it up through the gears?

[Dino]

Glad you got it sorted in the end, hope the lawyers didn't bleed you dry!

[FJRider]

Hey guys some of you may remember I was arested for a copa hearing my motorbike acelerate at daangerous speed earlier this year, have had my second defendant hearing and was found not guitly due to lack of evidence im glad that I was not put on the doc as I was not interested in answering questions by the prosecutor.

So good out come in all. After spendinf 6 hours in court we finally got it sorted. Its not just tax returns that governement agencies are slow with..

any ways back to biking, just have to watch that throtle hand

Go to thread and put pointer on EDIT... CLICK...and do it yourself....

[maybe]

I must of missed something did you say you were booked because a cop heard your bike accelerate

[NOMIS]

Please take this with the humour in which it is intended but I found this very funny indeed. I think its not just the heading thats an issue.

Shocking huh, no excuse for that one lol except a loooooonnnnggg day haha. see who this upsets lol always seem's to be someone. I will go back and fix

[R6_kid]

I must of missed something did you say you were booked because a cop heard your bike accelerate

Thats the most bullshit reason i've heard for someone getting arrested when riding a bike. More to the point, if a thread was taken from here and used as evidence you should have known about it, any evidence before the courts must be known by both parties - atleast from I know.

[NOMIS]

Okay sorry about the spelling guys. was typing in the dark but majority of it was I just couldnt be stuffed..


Yes but I got off on the charge, And I wasnt really slaming it through the gears's If you want please read the link to below thread

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/showthread.php?t=70260&highlight=court+monday

[NOMIS]

Thats the most bullshit reason i've heard for someone getting arrested when riding a bike. More to the point, if a thread was taken from here and used as evidence you should have known about it, any evidence before the courts must be known by both parties - atleast from I know.

That's what I said but it was on seperate matters , was the fact I posted the constables name.. WTF?? lol

[MadDuck]

More to the point, if a thread was taken from here and used as evidence you should have known about it, any evidence before the courts must be known by both parties - atleast from I know.

Not necessarily R6. I have been on the receiving end of a thread off here being used in a Court with NO notification.

[sinfull]

Go to thread and put pointer on EDIT... CLICK...and do it yourself.... And once you have hit edit then go advanced so you can change the header !


Thats the most bullshit reason i've heard for someone getting arrested when riding a bike. More to the point, if a thread was taken from here and used as evidence you should have known about it, any evidence before the courts must be known by both parties - atleast from I know. Think from what he said it sounds like he did see it but it was never brought up in court ! Was a gimme that he got off the charge, i'm surprised the judge didn't give the cop a verbal bashing !

[AllanB]

Ah yes - back in the old days you could ride past a cop in first gear doing 50ks with a open pipe and just get a shake of the head.

So I have been told.

[scracha]

Ah yes - back in the old days you could ride past a cop in first gear doing 50ks with a open pipe and just get a shake of the head.

So I have been told.

"sorry M'lud, the bike coughs and splutters at anything other than first gear below 60"...........hmm...this is kinda true.

[NOMIS]

at the time my bike was extremly loud and a lil 4pot 250cc motorbike reving its balls off does sound like its going fast .. but oh well.. not guilty was all i wanted to hear

[Boob Johnson]

So he heard a 4cyl 4 stroke two fiddy going through the gears, no speed registered & that went to court? What else were you doing or what were the rest of the circumstances? Sounds a little over the top to me.

[Patrick]

...and to the Cop who obviously passed my "court on monday" thread to The arresting constable... lame.... How was I mean't to know.

Nothing in the thread anyway. Only what was alledged to have happened and advice from then on. Dunno what the point was in having it at court anyway. One can say whatever one wants in here and doesn't mean it is true - more like hearsay which is inadmissable anyway...

And before anyone asks if it was me... AS IF!!!!!!

[NOMIS]

So he heard a 4cyl 4 stroke two fiddy going through the gears, no speed registered & that went to court? What else were you doing or what were the rest of the circumstances? Sounds a little over the top to me.

No thats what i was doing.... thats the basis for the arrest. Its been to court for 1 satus hearing, all done. and now 2 defendant hearing almost becamse a 3rd because we where running out of time

[NOMIS]

Nothing in the thread anyway. Only what was alledged to have happened and advice from then on. Dunno what the point was in having it at court anyway. One can say whatever one wants in here and doesn't mean it is true - more like hearsay which is inadmissable anyway...

And before anyone asks if it was me... AS IF!!!!!!

Could have been various people who I let use my account aswell, Like the one who cant spell very good ;-).And the other one who call's people nasty names

[MadDuck]

Could have been various people who I let use my account aswell, Like the one who cant spell very good ;-).And the other one who call's people nasty names

Hahahaha....them buggers that cant spell must just really tick you off huh?

[stify]

More to the point, if a thread was taken from here and used as evidence you should have known about it, any evidence before the courts must be known by both parties - atleast from I know.

ask for disclosure(i tink) b4 u have ya hearing...they need to supply all related(like cousins) evidence that relates(like cousins) that applies to the charge's you is facing....or if i'm wrong.....which i often am, patrick or mr scumdog will soon point it out

[Boob Johnson]

ask for disclosure(i tink) b4 u have ya hearing...they need to supply all related(like cousins) evidence that relates(like cousins) that applies to the charge's you is facing....or if i'm wrong.....which i often am, patrick or mr scumdog will soon point it out
I tink you is right me old china. My understanding is if you is fetchin to blame someting on someone else then you's is best be sayin exactly who it is :blink:

[skidMark]

at the time my bike was extremly loud and a lil 4pot 250cc motorbike reving its balls off does sound like its going fast .. but oh well.. not guilty was all i wanted to hear


Yeah IL4 250s with loud cans always sound like you are doing a million miles an hour...

neighbours always gave me ribbons regarding me speeding every day etc, eventually one called the piggys...cops waited over the hill....

Went over in my usual mannor, copper pulls me up, ahh yes i have you at 57kph, okayyy but you guys dont usually ticket until after 10kph over you know discretion etc...

he says oh nono i wont be giving you a ticket

"one of your neighbours rang up actually a few people in the area regarding a bike going like clappers out of this neighbourhood alot, i heard you coming and it sounded like you were going for it, but then could only lock you at 57"

"well yeah its a 250 gotta ring the tits off it to make it go anywhere"

"yeah mate, used to have one myself in my younger days, but had to come check it out under bosses orders, on ya way son..."

:Police:

i was only winding it up to like 8 grand!

redline is 19k!

[discotex]

So good out come in all.


:wari: Nice one. Good on you for defending it and winning.

[Mully]

Only just seen this thread. Glad you got off. Maybe you can stop throwing the bike down the road now and things will be better.

[NOMIS]

Only just seen this thread. Glad you got off. Maybe you can stop throwing the bike down the road now and things will be better.

How am I going to throw 150= kgs???? ................. I would have to start first

[Choco]

Congrats on not getting busted! :niceone:
It's not our fault we redline at 16k RPM :rolleyes:

[geoffm]

So what did it cost you in the end - lawyers fees, time off, etc? No wonder the cops can get away with stitching people up, as most cannot afford to defend it.

[NOMIS]

So what did it cost you in the end - lawyers fees, time off, etc? No wonder the cops can get away with stitching people up, as most cannot afford to defend it.

yeh that was it I almost came to that point, but a 6month disqualification... nah... not happening.

I havnt recieved the bill yet. but say going to cost me abit. Still less than the fine and court costs would have been hopefully

[bomma]

what a crock of shit!! glad to hear you got off mate!! fucking nazis!!

[Bloody Mad Woman (BMW)]

what a crock of shit!! glad to hear you got off mate!! fucking nazis!!

Ditto. But who's the fn retard that sent your post to the cops??!!

[NOMIS]

Ditto. But who's the fn retard that sent your post to the cops??!!

I know. bollox huh. I heard the cop talking about it when he handed over some papers to the prosecutor. Was eaves droppping... and I was sure I didnt say anything bad ( i didnt ) was just that I mentioned his name. How was I meant to know thats not allowed hah.

Oh well over now :-) Lawyer did her job which was good

[McJim]

It is a public forum and when you use google to search for things motorcycling it does tend to pop up often.

If the constable googled his own name it may have drawn him here and the Thursday night Aucklanders know the police look on here often so I wouldn't go around thinking someone saw the post and sent it to the police. More likely a constable took a look and saw the coppers name and thought "I'd better pass that to him since it just might be one of his cases".

[Patrick]

I know. bollox huh. I heard the cop talking about it when he handed over some papers to the prosecutor. Was eaves droppping... and I was sure I didnt say anything bad ( i didnt ) was just that I mentioned his name. How was I meant to know thats not allowed hah.

Oh well over now :-) Lawyer did her job which was good

You posted a copy of the letter to the Bureau which had his name on it, seeking advice. Nothing wrong with that.... Good result in the end.

[Nasty]

Ditto. But who's the fn retard that sent your post to the cops??!!

Two points this this comment -

Using names of cops etc is absolutely discouraged (apart from being stupid) .. and when mods are aware of it names are removed.

The other is there are many cops, their friends etc, frequent this site ... it is a public forum as discussed .. and no moves are taken, nor will they be taken, that cops can not frequent this site.

[Ixion]

I know. bollox huh. I heard the cop talking about it when he handed over some papers to the prosecutor. Was eaves droppping... and I was sure I didnt say anything bad ( i didnt ) was just that I mentioned his name. How was I meant to know thats not allowed hah.



Do you know on what basis that cliam is made? I know of no reason why I am not permitted to say publically "I received a ticket from Constable Plod last night". Or, indeed, "I was arrested by Constable Plod last night".

Indeed the argument that an accused person is not permitted to reveal the name of his accuser comes very close to an introduction of anonymous accusations ("Lettres de cachet") which has always been forbidden in our judicial system