US Vice-Presidential hopeful Sara Palin

[Dooly]

Sitting here at home recovering from a new hip transplant, got some time on my hands watching a bit of SKY etc, even resorting to some of the yank news channels and their mega US election coverage.
One thing I've noticed about Sara Pallin, McCain's VP candidate which has not been bandied about on the telly........a major factor........she's quite the MILF.
Very much so.
Not bad at all.
Very hitable.:yes::yes:

Thats all, as you were.:lol::2thumbsup

[Hitcher]

www.vpilf.com

[Headbanger]

Shes a tramp from way back. I'd bang it.....10 x.

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=107477&stc=1&d=1223629834

[Dooly]

Nice, Hitcher.:Punk:

[Storm]

So she rides then ? Thats the important thing

[Headbanger]

I figure showing some leg and leaning on a bike was good enough.

Now I need to see a flash of her under wear, I'm thinking black lace....though I'm always thinking black lace.

[Street Gerbil]

Smart and hot. Lucky americans!!!

[no-coast-punk]

<img src=http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg318/redracer1/Girls/dztob9.gif>

This one had me laughing my ass off. A bit NSFW. Mod's chime in and let me know if this need to be hot linked instead. I'm not quite up to the standards of what you guys can get away with yet.

Seriously though. She's a st000pid fucking cunt and nobody here likes her.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbQwAFobQxQ

<img src=http://beat.bodoglife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/spdebateflowchart.jpg>

This election is a total farce. Many people here are disgusted enough with both parties to not vote (including me).

[Forest]

She's attractive. But only until the point at which she opens her mouth and starts talking.

[ynot slow]

She wouldn't make you want to chew your arm off if waking up next to her,and your arm entwined under her body,unfortunately if this happened with our pm you would.

[James Deuce]

There are many things about that woman that are unsavoury, worst of all is the stuff that is going down in her household at the moment that she's using the Presidential Campaign to run away from.

If she's unable to cope with the concept of personal responsibility, how will she cope with being at the helm when John McCain dies in office from extreme decrepitude?

"Attractive" is relative. She looks like an evil Baptist ex-beauty queen to me. Anna Nicole Smith had more moral backbone than the potential "vpilf".

[Robert Taylor]

There are many things about that woman that are unsavoury, worst of all is the stuff that is going down in her household at the moment that she's using the Presidential Campaign to run away from.

If she's unable to cope with the concept of personal responsibility, how will she cope with being at the helm when John McCain dies in office from extreme decrepitude?

"Attractive" is relative. She looks like an evil Baptist ex-beauty queen to me. Anna Nicole Smith had more moral backbone than the potential "vpilf".

Id vote for McCAin / Palin if I lived in the States. Obama has got the gift of the gab but Id worry how much depth there is behind it.....

[slofox]

unfortunately if this happened with our pm you would.

It would NEVER happen in the first place.........

[jrandom]

Very shaggable, agreed, but she's also a loopy fundamentalist Christian with an IQ that matches her shoe size.

I'd be quite happy to trade not parking my beef bus in her tuna town for a guarantee that she not be let anywhere near the War Room.

("Gentlemen! You can't fight in here...")

[jrandom]

Id vote for McCAin / Palin if I lived in the States.

Name one McCain policy which you consider superior to Obama's position.

Or is it just because you instinctively distrust anyone who's black and/or a 'leftie'?

You'd fit right in over there.

[James Deuce]

Id vote for McCAin / Palin if I lived in the States. Obama has got the gift of the gab but Id worry how much depth there is behind it.....

I wouldn't vote for either team. The Democratic selection has to be the weakest ever.

The person they needed right now is Hilary Clinton. She's the only politician who I loathe, but still respect for being devious, under-handed, and plain mean. Perfect combination for a country that needs to reinvent itself very, very quickly.

[MisterD]

Name one McCain policy which you consider superior to Obama's position.

Or is it just because you instinctively distrust anyone who's black and/or a 'leftie'?

You'd fit right in over there.

Shame on you Jrandom - any criticism of Obama is racism? That's not up to your usual standards of debate.

I too think B.O is, to employ a favourite northernism, "all mouth and no trousers"

[jrandom]

Shame on you Jrandom - any criticism of Obama is racism?

Not at all. I was just interested in RT's reasons for speaking of a 'lack of depth'. And, RT being RT, one always feels obliged to suspect that the reasons boil down to "I'm a grumpy old white man".

:msn-wink:

Like, what does 'lack of depth' actually mean? Policies are policies. I'd like to see where the Democrats are failing to pony up in that regard. Not that I have a firm opinion of my own on it - it's just that when people say that there's a lack, I assume they're talking about something specific.

And if they have nothing specific to point to, I'm going to start wondering about irrational prejudices...


I too think B.O is, to employ a favourite northernism, "all mouth and no trousers"

Mmyes. So, why do you think that?

[Street Gerbil]

You people need to understand that the elections are all about compromises. We may dislike something in McCain or Republicans just as we dislike certain things in Nats. But we are going to vote Nats anyhow, just as Americans are going to vote McCain just because the alternative is Helen Clark/Obama bin Biden.

[jrandom]

You people need to understand that the elections are all about compromises.

And, apparently, personalities are far more important than policies.

I see you're another anti-Obama type. I find that fascinating. What is it that you think makes the man a bad presidential candidate?

[Street Gerbil]

I see you're another anti-Obama type. I find that fascinating. What is it that you think makes the man a bad presidential candidate?
Ghmmmm.... where do I start? Like not being Jimmy Carter v.2.0. Or not being a feminine version of Helen Clark.

[James Deuce]

But we are going to vote Nats anyhow.

No we're not. My wife is a longtime National supporter.

Last night John Key dissed Nursing so badly that she won't ever vote National again.

Most of you probably missed it, but John Key said "most patients don't care about the medal on the Nurse's uniform."

Look for the standard of care to fall in hospitals as highly qualified nurses are replaced by untrained aides. Good way of saving cash in the hospital system.

I'm not voting National simply because they are actively working to exclude one of my kids from ever going to school, ever getting a job, and ever being able to form relationships with similarly afflicted peers. Keep them isolated and uneducated and they die sooner, thereby relieving the state of a burden. I expect compulsory genetic screening and compulsory abortions to implemented and probably supported by most KBers, not long after the election is over.

John Key made his money from fiddling with money. He is the financial equivalent of a paedophile, and has the moral and ethical backbone of an Eel. At least Helen's authoritarian leanings are plainly known. In reality what effect have Labour's policies had on most of you directly? I would suspect very little. Businesses struggle in NZ under an intolerable burden, that is plain to see, and that needs to change, but I fear any change is gong to be too little and too late. John Key has already stated that the tax rebate for R&D is going to be abolished if National get in. NZ's leadership plainly don't want innovative niche manufacturing in NZ.

[Coyote]

Name one McCain policy which you consider superior to Obama's position.

Or is it just because you instinctively distrust anyone who's black and/or a 'leftie'?

You'd fit right in over there.
McCain has policies? Has he mentioned them in a debate? Cause I haven't heard one yet. But I know Obama is a baaaaaad man.

George W. Bush has been the lulziest president by far. McCain is an older replica that should continue the zany fun. And by the time we're bored of him, he should die off and then it'll be Palin's turn! Then hopefully Jesus will fly down in his F-22 Raptor and save us all before someone gets hurt that's not Arab.

Did you know: Firefox spellcheck's first correction to 'Arab' being spelt without a capital A is 'crab'?

[MisterD]

Mmyes. So, why do you think that?

Mainly it's the over-reliance on this "change" mantra - I see too much of the Tony Blair in him for my liking, all he seems to stand for is not being George W.

Not that I'm a big fan of McCain either, I guess they're all just too American for my liking.

[Robert Taylor]

Name one McCain policy which you consider superior to Obama's position.

Or is it just because you instinctively distrust anyone who's black and/or a 'leftie'?

You'd fit right in over there.

Its despicable for you to infer what you just did, I have friends who have a different colour skin and heck, I even have friends who are lefties ( we just agree to disagree )

Obama as I said has got the gift of the gab and has got a domineering voice, so have a lot of used car salesmen. I dont like such people and prefer those with a quiet demeanour. Heck I would have voted for JFK in the sixties, despite his human failings.

Frankly neither presidential choices are great.

[Dave Lobster]

Mainly it's the over-reliance on this "change" mantra - I see too much of the Tony B liar in him for my liking, all he seems to stand for is not being George W.


Edited for spelling.:Oops:

[jrandom]

Obama as I said has... a domineering voice... I dont like such people.

You prefer candidates on the basis of likeability? Me, I'd vote for a complete bastard if I thought he was more likely to make the right decisions in office.

I apologise for the implication of racism, by the way. Always good to hear that some of a person's best friends aren't white, etc.

So, anyhoo. It seems clear that the local anti-Obama faction are reacting instinctively to his personal manner, rather than disagreeing with any actual policies or philosophical positions of his camp.

I must say, that seems... oddly juvenile.

[jrandom]

... over-reliance on this "change" mantra

Every candidate has to have soundbites for the average Murkn TV viewer with an brain the size of a ping-pong ball. He's inevitably damned to reciting meaningless mantras, because nobody would pay attention if he said anything else.

I think you might find, however, that if you read some of his policy papers, buried deep on the interwebs, he has some rather productive ideas.

Not that it matters. We're spectators. Personally, I'd favour settling the election with a fight to the death between the VP candidates.

:corn:

[jrandom]

John Key has already stated that the tax rebate for R&D is going to be abolished if National get in.

There is a large question mark over whether this has ever benefited anyone other than accountants, and companies which would have been quite successful even without it.

Part of the problem is that to get a tax credit, you have to have revenue in the first place, and if you have revenue you're generally in a position to fund R&D via further investment anyhow. The tax credit is just... not the right answer.

Note that National is not suggesting canning TBG (http://www.frst.govt.nz/investframe/areas/business/TBG) and the like, which has had a demonstrable positive effect (heck, it's paid my salary for a couple of years).


NZ's leadership plainly don't want innovative niche manufacturing in NZ.

See, that's an uninformed and alarmist statement, right there. You have a spin doctor's logic, my lord!

Now, regarding National, I agree with you in terms of the nursing issue, etc. I also agree that Key is a slimeball.

Historically, I've always felt that Labour's policies have tended toward a safer long-term social approach. But the current administration is morally bankrupt. It needs to go, even if only for a single term, so that it may return duly chastised and ready to actually listen to its electorate.

That's why, this election, I'm pulling the finger to the whole steaming lot of them, and ticking the leaf (http://www.alcp.org.nz/).

:niceone:

[The Stranger]

I must say, that seems... oddly juvenile.

Even more juvenile I guess is that I tend to root for the underdog.
Given the somewhat extreme left stance of the press and media, I hope McCain/Palin win just to spite them.

That and hey, I'd rather watch a speech by Palin than Klark anyday.

[jrandom]

hey, I'd rather watch a speech by Palin...

I'm just waiting for her to hop up on a lectern and start shooting ping-pong balls out of her pussy.

You gotta figure there's some hidden talent McCain knows about that we don't...

[The Stranger]

I'm just waiting for her to hop up on a lectern and start shooting ping-pong balls out of her pussy.

You gotta figure there's some hidden talent McCain knows about that we don't...

Good luck with that one, whatever you look for in a VP I guess.

Seems he does, he was trailing hugely at the polls until he nominated her.

[alanzs]

Very shaggable, agreed, but she's also a loopy fundamentalist Christian with an IQ that matches her shoe size.
("Gentlemen! You can't fight in here...")

If her shoe size was metric it would be even bigger than the US size. A size 6 to a 34 - big difference. Still a fucking moron though... But, hey she can gut a moose. :shit:

[James Deuce]

There is a large question mark over whether this has ever benefited anyone other than accountants, and companies which would have been quite successful even without it.

Part of the problem is that to get a tax credit, you have to have revenue in the first place, and if you have revenue you're generally in a position to fund R&D via further investment anyhow. The tax credit is just... not the right answer.



I have actually done some study in this arena at a post graduate level and actually feel that I am, for once, qualified to comment.

The return on R&D investment from a Government or Government agency takes at least a generation to materialise, in much the same way culturally diverse immigrant social groups to begin to contribute to the greater society in which they now live, once there immediate descendants enter the work force or University. The short term rationale that "there is no measurable return" is what has lead to the dissolution of seemingly "useless" tertiary courses and the promotion of vocational Polytechnics to University status. This has effectively removed the platform on which any quality economy is built. Committed, knowledgeable, educated trades people. Long term positive change requires firm direction and positive encouragement. You can study your arse off in NZ, either trade related or at a tertiary institute, and all it does is make your fiscally poorer in the long run. There is no return for real effort. Unless you're a goober like me and personal satisfaction plays a big part in your life.

The R&D tax credit was a response to finally noticing that quality academic resource was emigrating rapidly and the IP of Universities and medical facilities was going with them. Too late, but better than nothing. Unfortunately most Universities and Hospitals, including the teaching ones are now run by "managers". This is entirely consistent with free market economic practice, but is fraught with danager if not managed by a Government capable of a long view. The last 10 years have created a hole in our intellectual psyche that will most likely be filled by the philosophies of a different culture and take 30-50 years to happen. Watch our standard of living relative to the rest of the world slip in the meantime.

I am not being alarmist. You sir have alarm bells going off because there is primordial twitch alerting you to the potential for fundamental change in NZ society. Thing is, we need it desparately. The protest generation of the '60s have done vastly more damage to the societies they have been entrusted with than any government before them. Without even a major global war, they have managed to wedge our heads up our arse and taught us that Government means "bad" and everything different from our society is to be feared, while at the same time demanding that we accept changes that have a negative net effect on our quality of life without question. The protest generation are a graphic example of what happens when Universities and Societies are caught in a morphic dialectic. The old guard can;t see it coming and the n00bs get swept away in a tide of self-importance, because they "know more" than the rest of thepeople in the society in whihc they live. Every person you meet will have a level of importance in your life and they deserve your attention. Otherwise we get Helen Clarks and Junior Kahuis living side by side.

A Government's role is not to effect fundamental short term change, but to manage the effects of long term change. Abolish the 3 year term and replace it with a minimum of 5 years (my preference is for 10 - people might actually think about the consequences of their actions if they are around in a position of responsibility to see them play out over time), and use John Key's new Prisons to lock up people don't vote.

[Ixion]

.. Abolish the 3 year term and replace it with a minimum of 5 years (my preference is for 10 - people might actually think about the consequences of their actions if they are around in a position of responsibility to see them play out over time), and use John Key's new Prisons to lock up people don't vote.

That just goves the rat bags more time to feather their nests undisturbed.

A better solution to the problem of forcing governments to take a long term view (and they will always need to be forced), is a House of Lords. We suffer badly from not having one.

But what has any of that to do with rooting Sarah Palin - which I would definately be up for. She shoots meese and bodybuilds. What do you suppose those pussy muscles would be like?

Who carees if she doens't know anything. McCain does, and he's a relatively young man, no danger he won't see out the term. So Sarah can focus on bonking and opening shooting galleries. And being ornamental sexual fantasy material . Which neither the Biden fellow or Obama are.

[BarBender]

But what has any of that to do with rooting Sarah Palin - which I would definately be up for. She shoots meese and bodybuilds. What do you suppose those pussy muscles would be like?

I think its her mouth you'd have to worry about



Who carees if she doens't know anything. McCain does, and he's a relatively young man, no danger he won't see out the term. So Sarah can focus on bonking and opening shooting galleries. And being ornamental sexual fantasy material . Which neither the Biden fellow or Obama are.

She's only a McCain heartbeat from the presidency should the GOPs pull through so the bonking should sit well with her domestic economic policies / continued screwing of Joe Six Pack by corporates and the shooting galleries be in line with Rep foreign policy and stance on Iraq.

[Ixion]

I think its her mouth you'd have to worry about
...

Oh my goodness. I think I need to go and have a wee lie down.

[Robert Taylor]

Oh my goodness. I think I need to go and have a wee lie down.

Me too, I need to rest my dirty right wing fascist / capitalist head! Generated some more tax to pay today to keep societys drones happy.

[Headbanger]

Did you know: Firefox spellcheck's first correction to 'Arab' being spelt without a capital A is 'crab'?



Yours must be dodgy.

[jrandom]

I have actually done some study in this arena at a post graduate level and actually feel that I am, for once, qualified to comment.

My main point was that a tax credit isn't necessarily the best mechanism for encouraging R&D - it only works when there's already a positive revenue stream.

Which means that:

(a) it encourages a very short-term business focus; and

(b) it's useless for blue-sky research that isn't already backed by a profitable enterprise.

Ergo, scrapping the tax credit does not necessarily constitute an attack on R&D.

You may consider your broader unrelated comments about how society's going to the dogs duly acknowledged...

[Coyote]

There is no return for real effort. Unless you're a goober like me and personal satisfaction plays a big part in your life.

I must be a goober. I chose to go to Weltec to study Auto Refinishing since it was a trade I was interested in. I've seen shows like Monster Garage, American Chopper and Pimp My Ride and seen what they can do with paint and saw some nice show cars and thought "I want to be part of that". Of course, I'm now looked down upon many people thinking I'm just another high school drop out that's been forced to do a trade. The best example by far has been when my mum said to her boss what I'm learning, the boss replied "but I thought he was meant to be smart?". I thought I was being smart by not spending 5 years at uni, but go figure.

Personal satisfaction reminds me of an article I read in Time magazine at the doctors office (not sure which issue, it went on about Hillary versus Obama though). Apparently people that are very happy with their lives often don't earn as much money or aren't as successful as those that aren't so happy. The conclusion they came to from this: being happy can stop you from becoming rich and successful so it's best not to be so happy. Sigh...

[Coyote]

Even more juvenile I guess is that I tend to root for the underdog.
Given the somewhat extreme left stance of the press and media, I hope McCain/Palin win just to spite them.

That and hey, I'd rather watch a speech by Palin than Klark anyday.
The "liberal media" is a joke. When Fox News became popular for it's obvious Republican bias, the other networks fought for ratings by doing the same thing. They've cooled down now and only Fox has continued.

The Democrats are about as left wing as my right foot. And news outlet with a bias toward them is not extreme left

Got to love Firefox spellchecker. First spelling suggestion to Obama is, you guessed it, Osama.

[k14]

Most of you probably missed it, but John Key said "most patients don't care about the medal on the Nurse's uniform."
Lol, I think you better put that in context. He was talking how national will let use more spare capacity in private hospitals and referring to the fact that paitents don't care if its public or private (different nurses/doctors) all they care about is getting the operation!!

[Street Gerbil]

Guys, I can see why you think this way. Were I born in a happy Kiwiland I would probably have rooted for the "cute underdog fighting for simple folk" like you guys do. But I was born and spent my teenage years in the communist paradise of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and that experience caused me to develop intense disliking of and distrust to anything reeking of Marxism. I hear Obama's "change" mantra and I recall lessons of the History of RSDLP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Social_Democratic_Labour_Party) in high school. I hear "Obama" and I think of Lenin. That's all.



No we're not. [...]
John Key has already stated that the tax rebate for R&D is going to be abolished if National get in. NZ's leadership plainly don't want innovative niche manufacturing in NZ.
That's why I said that elections are all about compromise. I don't like the R&D part a single bit (I work in R&D too, you know), but better that than the whole economy ran into the ground with cockamamie global warming taxes and suicidal trade agreements and local businesses running for dear life overseas.


You prefer candidates on the basis of likeability? Me, I'd vote for a complete bastard if I thought he was more likely to make the right decisions in office.
That's the whole point of me disliking Obama. His track record shows that he will be making *left* decisions. :laugh:



It seems clear that the local anti-Obama faction are reacting instinctively to his personal manner, rather than disagreeing with any actual policies or philosophical positions of his camp.
Please see above. I think Obama is very likable and I could not care less about his color of skin. I only disagree with his radical left ways.



Not that it matters. We're spectators.
You are right, J. However, I managed to talk my friend in US out of voting for "change". :-)



Personally, I'd favour settling the election with a fight to the death between the VP candidates.

Hell yeah! I am with you on this one. That would be a sight to behold - Palin gutting Biden like a moose.:Punk:



meese

What a beautiful word! It shall take the rightful place in my vocabulary alongside "irregardless" and "disconcerning". Well deserved bling is on the way.

[Ocean1]

The short term rationale that "there is no measurable return" is what has lead to the dissolution of seemingly "useless" tertiary courses and the promotion of vocational Polytechnics to University status. This has effectively removed the platform on which any quality economy is built. Committed, knowledgeable, educated trades people. Long term positive change requires firm direction and positive encouragement. You can study your arse off in NZ, either trade related or at a tertiary institute, and all it does is make your fiscally poorer in the long run. There is no return for real effort. Unless you're a goober like me and personal satisfaction plays a big part in your life.

Most of the tertiary courses recently offered and even more recently deceased were constructed for one purpose only: To tap the government’s new tertiary funding model. Most of them were unmitigated content-free crap, of zero commercial use.

You’re right about R&D funding though, the perception is that the IP returns are exclusively in marketable product. They’re not, they’re in the institutional knowledge base hard wired into the development tech’s. Some of the goobers use the same clever tricks again and again, refining them for different applications. The cumulative effect is what forms those senior tradesmen you mentioned.

It’s rare, now, to find one of the old government trained tradesmen still working in their trade, though. Faced with offers based on the perception they’re “skilled labour” they fuck off to far greener, if less productive pastures. When the steady supply of techies from govt training grounds dried up it took industry the better part of two decades to take up the slack. When they did instead of fitters we got “maintenance and diagnostics technicians”, a good insight as to what industry thought they wanted from the trades. Still, the syllabus’s the same, and most of them are as good as their fathers were at that age. However they also tend not to stick around too long, they’re young, they’ve got debt here, not too many ties, and the grass is way greener over the ditch.


Unfortunately most Universities and Hospitals, including the teaching ones are now run by "managers".

You’ll be delighted to learn that the “managers” at your local DHB are, in fact, nurses.



Scary as fook they are too.

[Ixion]

All well and good, but a lot of smarty pants blather won't give you any advantage getting into Sarah's pants. Line's over on the left, you're at the end. Mind you, all that lot might give you a way head start on getting into Obama's pants , if you're that way inclined. Far as I know there's no line. Enjoy

[James Deuce]

You’ll be delighted to learn that the “managers” at your local DHB are, in fact, nurses.



Scary as fook they are too.

I know a lot of them personally. When they were Nurses, they did fock all nursing. They were gold digging and bullying from Day One. They are not the sort of people you want running a hospital. They're feral and view staff focused on Nursing Practicum as a liability.

[James Deuce]

Lol, I think you better put that in context. He was talking how national will let use more spare capacity in private hospitals and referring to the fact that paitents don't care if its public or private (different nurses/doctors) all they care about is getting the operation!!

We were both watching that. The context was that they would be using Surgical resource in both private and public hospitals and "reducing costs". The Nursing Medal was a blatant dig at recent attempts to get Nurses paid better than McDonalds duty managers. He has ranted about the "specialisation" of Nursing costing millions before.

[Ocean1]

I know a lot of them personally. When they were Nurses, they did fock all nursing. They were gold digging and bullying from Day One. They are not the sort of people you want running a hospital.


I know all of the managers there dude. With few exceptions they're not locals, so if you knew them as nurses you sure got around.

[James Deuce]

I know all of the managers there dude. With few exceptions they're not locals, so if you knew them as nurses you sure got around.

You'd be surprised.

58 dinners too many.

[Ixion]

Thinks : Sarah Palin in one of those nurses' uniforms, the ones with the really short skirts and tight little tops. Oh my, I'm going to have to go and lie down again.


BTW, is her name Sarah or Sara? If we're going to cyber-fuck her we really should at least know her name .

[Hitcher]

BTW, is her name Sarah or Sara? If we're going to cyber-fuck her we really should at least know her name .

You could always "google" her...

[Storm]

"Hey baby" will do nicely- after all, you're all about the nurses uniform, complete with tight white panties, not the personality;)


(Geez, it a good thing shes foreign or I'd be hung and strung by the Electoral Bullshit Act :D)

[Ixion]

You could always "google" her...

That's the whole idea. But I don't think it's respectful to google a girl without knowing her name . Admittedly both sound the same which at least avoids the embarrasment of yelling "Oh , Sarah , arrrggghh " in the heat of the moment, and having her go "ah ahhhh ah , oh my God, ohhhh Ix.. -- hang on a minute, what did you say, MY name's Sara. Gerroff you bastard. "

Always wondered about that, after all if she was really into it, should she be sufficently 'present' to notice WHAT you said?

[pete376403]

Who carees if she doens't know anything. McCain does, and he's a relatively young man, no danger he won't see out the term. .

72 years old - "relatively young" compared to you perhaps. He has a 1500 page medical file and he's already had his first round with melanoma. There is every chance that Palin could be called upon to take command.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/us/politics/09mccain.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

[Hitcher]

72 years old - "relatively young" compared to you perhaps. He has a 1500 page medical file and he's already had his first round with melanoma. There is every chance that Palin could be called upon to take command.

Somebody register www.pilf.com -- quickly!

While we're on the subject of acronyms, the President is known by aides and advisers as POTUS and their missus is referred to as FLOTUS. What becomes of FLOTUS if they're a bloke?

[Skyryder]

Palin is just the result of her old man, Todd. As a fundamentilist he runs the household. Watch out World if Palin ever gets near the button.



Skyryder

[Oakie]

John Key made his money from fiddling with money. He is the financial equivalent of a paedophile

Unfair. You could say the same of any retailer in the country then. Key bought shares and made money by selling at a higher price. All retailers (even bike shops) buy products at a price then sell them at a higher price to make money. No difference really. Playing the financial markets is not illegal, immoral nor is it black magic.