View Full Version : Clutchless upshifting?
samgab
1st December 2008, 18:27
Hey there. I'm fairly new back into motorcycling, with a past of riding farm bikes, trail bikes, and very small motorbikes that *needed* to be fanged hard.
What is the general consensus on clutchless upshifting?
For the first couple of days I was using the clutch for every shift, but now I've gotten back into the habit of clutchless.... It's so much faster and smoother -- when you get it right.
Does it cause any excessive wear and tear on the gears? It doesn't seem to. When you preload the gear lever a little and just blip the throttle a bit it's almost instantaneous.
So do you use the clutch for upshifts?
http://www.sportrider.com/ride/146_0704_clutchless_upshifting/index.html
Katman
1st December 2008, 18:43
Yes it certainly can cause accelerated wear.
Using the clutch removes the pressure exerted on the gear dogs while they slip out of contact. Repeated clutchless shifting (especially when pre-loading the gear lever) often results in your bike jumping out of gear.
Maki
1st December 2008, 18:54
If you do it right, then clutchless upshifting is a great way to shift. Fast, smooth and does no harm.
http://cbrforum.com/m_690211/tm.htm
"I''ll point out that the type of transmissions used in motorcycles is completely different from a car transmission and clutchless shifting poses no threat of damage. In fact using the clutch causes more wear! (to the clutch plates)"
http://forums.sportrider.com/70/6232405/riding-techniques/another-clutchless-upshifting-question/index.html
"Something you might want to try that I found was pretty neat fun. I own a K6 Gixxer Thou'. While I don't usually ride childishly, recently I was bored and wondered whether the soft rev limiter wound allow a quick clutchless up-shift when it hit it. The answer is a resounding yes. Once you get past the looping point, preload the shifter and get it wide open in first. When it hits the limiter, you will get a perfect, ultra-fast shift into second (at an indicated 105 yet!). It'll pop up a bit and continue it's rocketship forward motion. 2nd to 3rd is almost as exciting. Had to shut down after that, very few places to hit 150 around here. Great fun. Enjoy the ride. Cheers, jack"
Katman
1st December 2008, 19:07
Fast, smooth and does no harm.
Oh, ok. Maybe I'll just sell my workshop and take up floral arranging instead.
hospitalfood
1st December 2008, 19:13
dont do it myself, i think plenty of people do but.
tried it a couple of times but i find i can change fast with the clutch so stuck with that.
cs363
1st December 2008, 19:14
If you do it right, then clutchless upshifting is a great way to shift. Fast, smooth and does no harm.
http://cbrforum.com/m_690211/tm.htm
"I''ll point out that the type of transmissions used in motorcycles is completely different from a car transmission and clutchless shifting poses no threat of damage. In fact using the clutch causes more wear! (to the clutch plates)"
http://forums.sportrider.com/70/6232405/riding-techniques/another-clutchless-upshifting-question/index.html
"Something you might want to try that I found was pretty neat fun. I own a K6 Gixxer Thou'. While I don't usually ride childishly, recently I was bored and wondered whether the soft rev limiter wound allow a quick clutchless up-shift when it hit it. The answer is a resounding yes. Once you get past the looping point, preload the shifter and get it wide open in first. When it hits the limiter, you will get a perfect, ultra-fast shift into second (at an indicated 105 yet!). It'll pop up a bit and continue it's rocketship forward motion. 2nd to 3rd is almost as exciting. Had to shut down after that, very few places to hit 150 around here. Great fun. Enjoy the ride. Cheers, jack"
Just because some twat posts information on an internet forum does not make it gospel! (feel free to apply that rule to this and all other posts in this thread)
As most modern motorcycles have a sequential gearbox you can reasonably safely shift clutchlessly without any undue wear if you employ some mechanical sympathy - that is backing off a tad as you would if changing with the clutch. If you want to flat shift you certainly can and it is fast - but ultimately this will cause accellerated wear.
The best thing if you really want go down this road is to get a quick shift kit which will usually include a 'black box' that will momentarily cut the ignition, providing the above mentioned mechanical sympathy automatically.
cs363
1st December 2008, 19:16
Oh, ok. Maybe I'll just sell my workshop and take up floral arranging instead.
:yes: The Katana would look lovely surrounded by pansies.... :whistle: :laugh:
Reckless
1st December 2008, 19:19
All I can tell you is for many years Kart racing 125 and 250 2strokes (MX engines) on petrol, avgas and methanol. Covering Kawasaki, Yamaha and Cagiva engines we never even had clutch baskets. The clutch Basket and plate removal were one of the first mods we did. Only cog left in that side was the power valve drive. I don't know of many failed gearboxes, I never had one. Think about a gearbox kart and how many times per lap you bang it very quickly down a few gears going into a corner then up again etc. We gave them absolute hell. Mind you we where racing if your doing it for laziness you "rep what you sow".
I find myself doing the same on my MX bike but I must admit I use the clutch on the old Z1R.
The trick was to come off throttle for the split second it takes to change, if you try to pull it through under power I think you will cause damage.
My 2c
Katman
1st December 2008, 19:24
And pre-loading the gear lever initiates the process of gear dogs sliding apart but does so while full load is imparted upon the dogs. Eventually instead of two 90 degree mating surfaces the gear dogs wear at a slight angle thereby causing the gears to naturally want to force themselves away from each other under heavy acceleration.
cs363
1st December 2008, 19:27
And pre-loading the gear lever initiates the process of gear dogs sliding apart but does so while full load is imparted upon the dogs. Eventually instead of two 90 degree mating surfaces the gear dogs wear at a slight angle thereby causing the gears to naturally want to force themselves away from each other under heavy acceleration.
Agreed - hence my 'twat' comment on that US forum posting.
Clutchless shifting as I outlined above isn't too bad all things considered, but pre - loading the gear lever is a definite no-no.
Katman
1st December 2008, 19:30
:yes: The Katana would look lovely surrounded by pansies.... :whistle: :laugh:
And before anyone suggests it, he's not talking about just when I'm sitting on it.
:msn-wink:
cs363
1st December 2008, 19:32
And before anyone suggests it, he's not talking about just when I'm sitting on it.
:msn-wink:
Err.... sitting on what Katman??!! :shutup: :rofl:
Reckless
1st December 2008, 19:34
Same, We never pre loaded the gear lever in the kart, you couldn't really unless you hand a hand on the gear lever all the time and that was impossible and I don't on the MX bike either? Only pull it through when the power is off!
samgab
1st December 2008, 20:21
Thanks for the feedback so far. Seems like there are opinions on both sides, and for my part, I think I'll use the clutch most of the time. It can't hurt to use it anyway.
Maki
5th December 2008, 06:45
Sounds like it's ok, as long as you don't pre load the lever. Did you know that many race bikes have a system that allows clutchless upshifts? It makes the throttle back off automatically when the gear lever is pushed up.
nodrog
5th December 2008, 07:19
Oh, ok. Maybe I'll just sell my workshop and take up floral arranging instead.
sweet, can you sort me out a nice button hole arrangement for the endurance race?
Richi
5th December 2008, 15:54
so for those who say its not so bad... if you are under full accelleration and button off the accelerator and kick the gear then open it up again this is better than preloading it? Doesnt seem much slower than preload but it does kick a wee bit..
Richi
5th December 2008, 15:57
or you could get a moped and not worry about changing gears :baby:
Boob Johnson
6th December 2008, 22:21
:yes: The Katana would look lovely surrounded by pansies.... :whistle:
Who said it isn't already?
:whistle:
:laugh:
Winston001
6th December 2008, 23:08
If it's so simple, why do motorcycle still have clutches.......:? :doh:
Maki
6th December 2008, 23:40
If it's so simple, why do motorcycle still have clutches.......:? :doh:
Because some more "traditional" riders still insist on a wank lever....
racerhead
7th December 2008, 04:48
If it's so simple, why do motorcycle still have clutches.......:? :doh:
And the clutch is also needed to get moving from a standstill.
I only use the clutch when Im riding around town at low rpm's and out on the road very rarely use it on the way up the box but I always use it for downchanges no matter what pace Im riding at
scumdog
7th December 2008, 07:49
Even in my alleged stone-age type bike I frequently upshift without using the clutch, ease off the throttle, click up and it's a seamless change of gears.:niceone:
1 Free Man
7th December 2008, 07:54
Thanks for the feedback so far. Seems like there are opinions on both sides, and for my part, I think I'll use the clutch most of the time. It can't hurt to use it anyway.
I have read all the posts up to this point and being one who is a bit challenged when it comes to the finer point of bike riding it occures to me that the bike manufacturers (read here ANY BRAND) wouldn't put clutch levers on the bike if they weren't supposed to be used. YES, NO, MAYBE. or am I just thinking to laterally here??.
toebug
7th December 2008, 08:30
so for those who say its not so bad... if you are under full accelleration and button off the accelerator and kick the gear then open it up again this is better than preloading it? Doesnt seem much slower than preload but it does kick a wee bit..
I agree with not pre-loading and if you get your throttle action right it wont kick either
If it's so simple, why do motorcycle still have clutches.......:? :doh:
Because you need to stop and start!!! On my dirt bike I up and down shift without the clutch, and I only use it to stop,start, and slip to build rpm. I up shift up on my fireblade without clutch but you must use it to down shift to stop the rear wheel locking. In 20 years I've never had an issue with clutchless upshifting.
R1madness
7th December 2008, 08:50
Ahh clutchless shifting. Do it as much as you can. Your local workshop will be glad for the work in about a year. Had 3 gearboxes to rebuild this year. All of them had read on the net about the benifits of clutchless shifting. All of them suffer the same result. Rounded off dogs and slots, worn out/bent shift forks. Great, about $650 for parts and depending on the bike (old FZRs you need to totaly strip the motor to do the gearbox) the labour can be heaps more than you realise....
so please ring me for an estimate when it craps out.........
Buckets4Me
7th December 2008, 08:55
on my bucket the clutch is only used for starts and to sling it out of corners
but if you flat shift it has a tendincy to lift the frount wheel up way up
I wouldn't like to shift down on a big 4stroke without using the clutch
specialy if slowing down in a HURRY and I usualy use the clutch when not fanging the bike
and as for selling the workshop because of this thread you should be happy with it specialy in these tough times
I have seen clutch baskets explode on hard gearchanges 1to2 on a 400 2stroke
( thats what you get with a 35+ year old bike that you play with )
MotoKuzzi
7th December 2008, 09:15
Makes you wonder how many riders who never had a problem with clutchless shifts ever owned a bike long enough to see the end result:laugh:
samgab
7th December 2008, 09:22
I wouldn't like to shift down on a big 4stroke without using the clutch specialy if slowing down in a HURRY and I usualy use the clutch when not fanging the bike
Yeah, that's why the new big sport bikes use a slipper clutch. Which I think are a great idea, btw, although I haven't ridden a big bike.
I have read all the posts up to this point and being one who is a bit challenged when it comes to the finer point of bike riding it occures to me that the bike manufacturers (read here ANY BRAND) wouldn't put clutch levers on the bike if they weren't supposed to be used. YES, NO, MAYBE. or am I just thinking to laterally here??.
I am not saying that your conclusion is wrong, but the logic you used to arrive at it is flawed. My question wasn't pertaining to not using the clutch lever at ALL; but just about upshifting. When starting off, stopping, idling at lights, and downshifting, the clutch is very handy, and maybe the manufacturers put it there for that purpose?
But no, I'm being pedantic: I agree that it makes sense to use the clutch most of the time for every gear; just wanted to point out the specious reasoning...
thereaper
7th December 2008, 12:24
Have fixed 2 zxr250s that had bent selector forks from clutchless up shifting and one was showing signs of wear on the dogs and slop in the bearings at only 6000ks. That said the zxr gearbox is a bit clunky anyway and not overly suited to this sort of treatment.
rocketman1
9th December 2008, 19:41
Mainly in between 4-5-6th gears, seems to be too much pressure on the clutch in the lower gears, but in the higher gears it is faster and seems smoother, I can t imagine that its is doing any harm.
In fact 5-6th using the clutch I can get a false neutral and that causes a bit of noise./??? so for me no clutch after 4th on the way up.
:niceone:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.