View Full Version : Iraqi hero reporter throws shoes at Bush
Usarka
16th December 2008, 06:18
An iraqi reporter threw his shoes at President Bush.....he's now a local hero...
Life imitates art, not sure which is funnier :lol:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nAGdsoaZUyE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nAGdsoaZUyE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5D5oKEVqQJg&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5D5oKEVqQJg&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>
Pwalo
16th December 2008, 06:36
I thought old Bush dodged them pretty well. He even had a sly grin on his face.
short-circuit
16th December 2008, 06:43
The Daily Show should have a good slant on it tonight
Sully60
16th December 2008, 07:13
Not bad George Dubya, better reactions than Austin Powers now if only he was smarter:rolleyes:
1 Free Man
16th December 2008, 07:17
Didn't ya just love it!! Old Bushy's lucky it wasn't bags of dog shit or some such.
I'm not surprise Bush never got hit he's beeen dodging around things for years he's a bloody expert at it!!
Swoop
16th December 2008, 07:36
Mad skillz Dubya!!!
Dooly
16th December 2008, 08:08
I reckon Dubya thought it was kinda funny.
vifferman
16th December 2008, 08:30
What that Iraqui did is a grave insult in Arab nations. It wasn't so much that he was trying to injure Bush as what it implies.
See this linky (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7783325.stm).
Sully60
16th December 2008, 08:35
What that Iraqui did is a grave insult in Arab nations. It wasn't so much that he was trying to injure Bush as what it implies.
See this linky (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7783325.stm).
Yeah I clearly remember the images when Baghdad was 'liberated' in 03 and one of Saddams bronze statues was pulled down then promptly jumped on by hundreds of people beating it with their shoes.
Common people, the most accurate politcal commentators:yes:
Tank
16th December 2008, 09:28
I thought old Bush dodged them pretty well. He even had a sly grin on his face.
He did - Apparently when asked about it by the press: "All I can tell you is that it was a size 10"
I'm sure some security guy will lose his job for not getting to the guy in time.
Road Guardian
16th December 2008, 09:38
Where were the secret service pouncing all over the shoe thrower, and why wasnt bush taken away quickly like most events like this.
At least he can dodge a shoe, could he dodge a bullet though????
Tank
16th December 2008, 09:40
At least you know that the guy throwing the shoes will get a fair trial.
After sitting in Guantanamo bay for 30 years.
Finn
16th December 2008, 09:54
Very funny. Bush got a laugh out of it and the Arab got beaten up and sent to Guantanamo with no shoes.
ManDownUnder
16th December 2008, 09:58
Very funny. Bush got a laugh out of it and the Arab got beaten up and sent to Guantanamo with no shoes.
It's like the US presidential race... all's well that ends well..
slofox
16th December 2008, 10:08
If the shoes smelt like some shoes i have met, it could have been fatal after all...........
Skyryder
16th December 2008, 11:59
They are calling it freedom of expression. So on that basis 'throwing ' bullets is also 'freedom of expression.'
Skyryder
slofox
16th December 2008, 12:24
They are calling it freedom of expression. So on that basis 'throwing ' bullets is also 'freedom of expression.'
Skyryder
Or grenades?
EJK
16th December 2008, 12:29
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zw97LIBGbR4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zw97LIBGbR4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Swoop
16th December 2008, 12:51
At least you know that the guy throwing the shoes will get a fair trial.
After sitting in Guantanamo bay for 30 years.
I guess that we will see America banning shoes on all international flights into and out of their airspace now?
How about the banning of tweezers on international flights? Fuck me! If someone is smart enough to hold up a plane with a pair of tweezers they bloody well deserve the aircraft!!!
toycollector10
16th December 2008, 12:56
The Iraqi isn't in jail, he's a hero all over the Middle East.
The irony is lost on the whole lot of them, as they celebrate him and how much they hate the West and Christians, that if he had thrown his shoes at Saddam Hussain he would probably have been fed feet first, still alive, through a log-shredder. A favourite act of his son Uday.
So it's a great day for Iraq that he can throw his shoes with impunity at GWB.
I heard some garbage-mouthed Iraqi Muslim quoted on Radio Live today about what a bastard Bush is and how it was a great thing to have happened.
My response to him would be a very firm "GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM THEN" and "WHY ARE YOU HERE?"
In fact I know why he's here but that's a subject for a whole new thread.
klingon
16th December 2008, 13:14
If I saw George Bush in the street I would probably throw my shoes at him too. It's not just Iraqis who feel that way about him.
Tank
16th December 2008, 13:21
The Iraqi isn't in jail, he's a hero all over the Middle East.
The irony is lost on the whole lot of them, as they celebrate him and how much they hate the West and Christians, that if he had thrown his shoes at Saddam Hussain he would probably have been fed feet first, still alive, through a log-shredder. A favourite act of his son Uday.
So it's a great day for Iraq that he can throw his shoes with impunity at GWB.
I heard some garbage-mouthed Iraqi Muslim quoted on Radio Live today about what a bastard Bush is and how it was a great thing to have happened.
My response to him would be a very firm "GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM THEN" and "WHY ARE YOU HERE?"
In fact I know why he's here but that's a subject for a whole new thread.
I had not thought of it like that - "So it's a great day for Iraq that he can throw his shoes with impunity at GWB." - That puts a lot into perspective.
Id give you bling, but, umm, I have a couple of infractions, and limited functionality of KB as a result.
pritch
16th December 2008, 14:15
I
How about the banning of tweezers on international flights? Fuck me! If someone is smart enough to hold up a plane with a pair of tweezers they bloody well deserve the aircraft!!!
Ahhh but you have to be careful, those tweezers fold out to twin .50 cal Browning machine guns...
short-circuit
16th December 2008, 15:38
They are calling it freedom of expression. So on that basis 'throwing ' bullets is also 'freedom of expression.'
Skyryder
Bullshit - lighten up bro.
Normally you tend to give a fairly balanced assessment - look at the bigger picture. That's the least that little bastard deserves.
Rodney007
16th December 2008, 15:47
as bush stated........ thats wat happens in a free society!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
like fuck he would of done that if sadam was ruling.... IRAQ IS FREE more iraqi's love bush than hate ..... you guys have no idea wat kind of life people live under the ruling of a leader such as sadam...
and so wat. tap a few oil fields when your there so wat..... wouldnt you?
all i know is bush is the man... Hes smart.. Hes funny.. He doesnt care wat media shrouded civilians care of him, and most of all he thinks of the well being of his country "and the world" first
he did wat he had todo , love him or hate him... hard works done,,, move in obama!
vifferman
16th December 2008, 15:51
you guys have no idea wat kind of life people live under the ruling of a leader such as sadam.
Yeah, I have some inkling of what it was like. I used to work with an Iraqui, and talked to him quite a bit at the time the US was 'liberating' Iraq. Very instructive.
toycollector10
16th December 2008, 16:38
It's really easy to hate GWB and the USA.
I don't hate the USA, for all of their faults they are a beacon of light in a pretty grim world.
And don't forget your history, if you ever learned any at all. If those GI's, Marines, Navy boys and aviators hadn't come down here to the South Pacific in 1943 we would in all probability be speaking Japanese and would also be slaves to them.
Would you rather live in a democracy or a Muslim, jihardist, medieval, tribal, West hating dictatorship? Where you and your family can just dissapear at any time after a knock on your door in the early hours?
Grow up FFS!!
SARGE
16th December 2008, 16:44
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to toycollector10 again
Usarka
16th December 2008, 17:04
For the first time it was almost someone elses foot in his mouth.
Manxman
16th December 2008, 20:34
I have a feeling that this guy will be jailed...for missing.
scumdog
16th December 2008, 20:37
What that Iraqui did is a grave insult in Arab nations. It wasn't so much that he was trying to injure Bush as what it implies.
See this linky (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7783325.stm).
BUT..but...for those it was aimed at it didn't matter, they just didn't give a shit.
Street Gerbil
16th December 2008, 23:51
Someone please say something worthy so I can spread around some bling to be able to give it to toycollector10 again.
puppykicker
17th December 2008, 00:03
I don't hate the USA, for all of their faults they are a beacon of light in a pretty grim world.
And don't forget your history, if you ever learned any at all. If those GI's, Marines, Navy boys and aviators hadn't come down here to the South Pacific in 1943 we would in all probability be speaking Japanese and would also be slaves to them.
if japan had not been dumb enough to directly attack the US they never would have gotten involved with WW2 and we would all be speaking japanese and britain would be run by nazis (i know it is anyway but they would actually call themselves nazis...) they werent protecting us, they were protecting themselves, we just got lucky
The Iraqi isn't in jail, he's a hero all over the Middle East.
The irony is lost on the whole lot of them, as they celebrate him and how much they hate the West and Christians, that if he had thrown his shoes at Saddam Hussain he would probably have been fed feet first, still alive, through a log-shredder. A favourite act of his son Uday.
So it's a great day for Iraq that he can throw his shoes with impunity at GWB..
actually he is in jail, but not before malikis security detail beat him to a bloody pulp, you can actually hear them kicking the shit out of him at the end of one of the vids on youtube
and on a more general note, fuck some of you people are disgusting. you know absolutely nothing about life in iraq before or after the invasion, but the fact that by even low estimates many hundreds of thousands and by from more reliable sources even millions of civillians are now dead as a direct result, and terrorists are stronger not only in iraq but worldwide should be a pretty good indicator that maybe it wasnt hugely well thought through. i recognise that your opinions are based off little fact and are mostly formulated by racism and general right-wing douchebaggery, but for gods sake at least get your facts right. would you rather live in a "free" society (it isnt really, saddam was more progressive and secular than the current govt) with your recently deceased wife and children, unable to get to work because the bus keeps getting blown up, or would you like to live under a brutal dictator that could at least keep your family safe as long as you didnt piss him off?
according to estimates published in the lancet medical journal the number of civilian iraqi deaths caused by the invasion is approx 1.2 million. this is around about equal to the estimated number of total people killed by saddam hussein since the 70s... think about that for a seccond, this great idea you are hailing to remove this brutal dictator and stop him from killing people, has resulted in roughly the same number of deaths in the past 6 years than the brutal dictator himself in the last 30... i should also add that around 500-700k of saddams kills were iranian military, not defenseless civilians... and that number includes about 500k people that starved or died from disease arguably more as a result of international sanctions than direct action from saddam, though he could have easily prevented it. so lets say bush has killed around 3 times as many iraqi civilians in 6 years as saddam ever did in 30 odd. but at least he removed saddam from power right? not like most of the baath party is still in government in iraq... oh wait, they are.
Sully60
17th December 2008, 07:47
not like most of the baath party is still in government in iraq... oh wait, they are.
And who assisted in putting them there in the first place?
Can someone else say something smart so I can bling puppykicker again?
There's no excuse in this day in age for just accepting the events selected for portrayal in the western media.
Go research some history, I'm sure some of you might be surprised at how the middle east has been 'shaped' by the great western powers.
toycollector10
17th December 2008, 12:16
Sorry, did someone mention the invasion of Kuwait? No.
I'm not liking the concept the puppykicker has of appeasment.
It didn't work in 1939 and it won't work in Iraq in 2008. In fact it never works.
Think about dictators, fascists and other despots and all the trouble and human misery they cause. And the kicker is dreaming if he thinks Sadam's secular state was pretty well run. It was running smoothly if he was gassing kurds or he was killing off those Islamic sects he didn't agree with.
Sadam, Hitler, Mussolini, Mugabe soon, it's all about action(s) then reaction(s)
and the reactions are usually bloody and extreme because that's the way of the real world.
Forest
17th December 2008, 12:46
I have a feeling that this guy will be jailed...for missing.
The reporter's brother has told the Associated Press that "Muntadhar has a broken leg, cracked ribs, some injures under his eye, and his leg is also hurting him."
Good to see that the West has installed justice alongside democracy.
SPman
17th December 2008, 13:32
There's no excuse in this day in age for just accepting the events selected for portrayal in the western media.
Go research some history, I'm sure some of you might be surprised at how the middle east has been 'shaped' by the great western powers.
Nah - it's easier to just vent based on what you see & hear on TV than to actually research from multiple independent diverse sources and form an opinion based on that.
But
What do I know
Or care.......
puppykicker
17th December 2008, 13:35
Sorry, did someone mention the invasion of Kuwait? No.
I'm not liking the concept the puppykicker has of appeasment.
It didn't work in 1939 and it won't work in Iraq in 2008. In fact it never works.
Think about dictators, fascists and other despots and all the trouble and human misery they cause. And the kicker is dreaming if he thinks Sadam's secular state was pretty well run. It was running smoothly if he was gassing kurds or he was killing off those Islamic sects he didn't agree with.
Sadam, Hitler, Mussolini, Mugabe soon, it's all about action(s) then reaction(s)
and the reactions are usually bloody and extreme because that's the way of the real world.
perhaps the west and the US in particular should have thought about that before giving him the chemical weapons he used on the kurds... you know about that right? i take it you also know that the US helped him into power so that he would go to war with iran?
removing a tyrant can be a very good thing, if its done right. but should the iraqi people not have some say in the matter?
and once again, bush/cheney and their ilk have now killed more poeple in 6 years than saddam did in 25. worth it? maybe, history will judge that, we cant really know. but i can tell you that they could have done it properly, they could have prevented a million civilian casualties, but they chose not to. the lied to get the invasion happening, theyve lied since. they tourture people and hold them indefinately with no trials and usually no evidence. these things are all war crimes, and if they strung up saddam for causing the deaths of all those kurds, and you agreed with it, then how can you possibly support the men that have caused more deaths? it doesnt make it ok because it was negligence and stupidity instead of intention.
puppykicker
17th December 2008, 13:49
and just to drive home my point a little
An Oxfam report from February 2008 put into startling focus what the U.S. invasion has really meant for Iraqis:
– More than four million Iraqis forced to flee either to another part of Iraq or abroad.
– Four million Iraqis regularly cannot buy enough food.
– 70 percent are without adequate water supplies, compared to 50 percent in 2003.
– 28 percent of children are malnourished, compared to 19 percent before the 2003 invasion.
– 92 percent of Iraqi children suffer learning problems, mostly due to the climate of fear.
The Brookings Institute’s Iraq index also notes that the national unemployment rate is somewhere between 25 and 40 percent. Fifty-six percent of Iraqis say things in Iraq are going “quite bad” or “very bad.” Sixty percent rate economic conditions as “poor” and 75 percent rate security conditions “poor.”
by most objective measures, things in iraq are much worse now that they were under saddam. but theyre free right?
pete376403
17th December 2008, 20:36
and just to drive home my point a little
70 percent are without adequate water supplies, compared to 50 percent in 2003.
– 28 percent of children are malnourished, compared to 19 percent before the 2003 invasion.
– 92 percent of Iraqi children suffer learning problems, mostly due to the climate of fear.
by most objective measures, things in iraq are much worse now that they were under saddam. but theyre free right?
And those pre-2003 figures are bad because of the sanctions and embargoes put in place after the kuwait invasion (which incidentally was more or less sanctioned by the US ambassador to Iraq at the time)
Another thing Iraqi children are suffering from is a huge increase in cancers - probably from the large amounts of depleted uranium munitions used by the us and british.
Usarka
17th December 2008, 20:56
Fuck me this was supposed to be a humorous thread bastards.
Who here has spoken to an Iraqi in the middle east. Like sat down and had a coffee with them and found out what they think and feel and how the sanctions from the first "conflict" ruined their livelyhoods.
bugger all i'd guess.
so all you judgemental fuckers stfu. you can't blame a whole race by the actions of the extreme, just like you can't judge the whole of america by the actions of their knob cheese president.
sure there are serious justifications for taking out dictators, imagine what had happened if hitler had been taken out. but weapons of mass destruction and people incarcerated for 7 years without trial?
etc
etc
etc.
jrandom
17th December 2008, 20:58
My goodness, this is indeed a fine drop. I might just finish the bottle and then log on to KB.
Awesome call there bro.
:2thumbsup
Mr. Peanut
17th December 2008, 20:58
It's scary when you think the gold standard for justice is trial by jury :sick:
gatch
17th December 2008, 21:28
jeez this thread got deeper than the marianas trench..
that dude who biffed the shoes has balls, pity he is now in several pieces..
i think the only thing that could have made a funnier news piece is if bush picked one up, called the dude out on his lack of foot hygiene, than proceeded to give the assailant an ass-whooping, with his own kicks..
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.