PDA

View Full Version : 86km to Huntly, and used just under half tank off gas - geeez.



crystalball
27th December 2008, 22:38
Now I exspect my 1990 zzr 400 shouldint use that much gas.It runs on 91 as the bike shop said to run it on that.
The last guy I brought it off reakons he ran it off 95 so the first week I used 95 but the bike missed a little bit and tugged like it was hungry for gas.Since I have used 91 those problems have gone. I find its good round town but on the highway it likes to use the gas. mayby its letting to much gas through in the petrol line i don't know.I only really use 5th and 6th gear on the highway so im not reving it all the time.It has a single muzzy exhaust system iv'e heard this also helps on fuel costs.:oi-grr:
i'll ask the bike shop next time i'm in.
I know most bikes are meant to be good fuel savers but geeez should last longer than that lol.:beer:

howdamnhard
28th December 2008, 00:19
I've got a 91' ZZR 600 and am currently getting 18km/l however that is pottering around commutting to work and back (4000rpmish).So I should get around 300plus km/tank(18l). I was told the 400 has the same frame as the 600 hundred so you are lugging around same weight with smaller engine.I sit at 5000rpm in top gear(6th) doing 100km/h.

crystalball
28th December 2008, 14:25
Year on highway sits between 6000 and 7000 revs in 6th gear just below 110km. I find in 50km speed zones I like to use 3rd most of the time which puts the revs around 5000. My bike seems too slugish if it sits on 4000 revs. Sometimes I do sit it around 4000 in 4th gear to try save on fuel.

Max Preload
29th December 2008, 12:51
Now I expect my 1990 zzr 400 shouldn't use that much gas.

Correct.


It runs on 91 as the bike shop said to run it on that.

That's just so wrong. 95 or higher.


The last guy I brought it off reckons he ran it off 95 so the first week I used 95 but the bike missed a little bit and tugged like it was hungry for gas.

Surging. Sounds like Shell's 95 V-Power.


Since I have used 91 those problems have gone. I find its good round town but on the highway it likes to use the gas. mayby its letting to much gas through in the petrol line.

The carburettors determine the fuel usage, not the petrol line. They do so primarily by regulating fuel level in the float bowls and jet sizes. When was the last time the carburettors were synchronised ('balanced')?


It has a single muzzy exhaust system I've heard this also helps on fuel costs.:oi-grr:

If it's properly tuned for it, it would be perhaps little different.


I know most bikes are meant to be good fuel savers but geeez should last longer than that lol.:beer:

Are or aren't? Ridden really sedately (like 100km/h all the way from Caltex Bombay to Shell Matamata) my 1100 has returned 60mpg (20km/l) with tank bag, tent & pack on-board.

FJRider
29th December 2008, 13:06
Check/clean your air filter... if its dirty, fuel/air ratio gets a little "one sided" and uses more fuel.
Up and down the gears (passing traffic and the like) Heavy braking and then acceleration, both chew into the gas on smaller bikes...
A smooth riding style will save you heaps...

Tone165
29th December 2008, 13:49
If you used 9ltrs of juice to go less than 90k's on a 400cc, and you were not towing a 20' caravan....you have a serious problem!

Get theee to a Mechanic asap, and get the bike serviced and tuned...sounds to me that you will recover the cost by the time the next service is due, in saved petrol money!

On fuel (octane) Bikes "can" run on 91 or 98, and in FI bikes the computer will make adjustments to suit on the move. Your bike which is not FI will go best on the fuel it is tuned for, I would advise 95 or 98, mostly cos they are cleaner, but they do have a higher "Calorific value" as well.

Octane is a bit of a red herring term. The main advantage of higher octane is its less prone to "pinking" or detonation in high compression situations (like bike engines)

Higher octane burns smoother when you ride rougher...

91 Octane is where the dregs and tailings are "dumped" and will have different characteristics week to week. Sometimes, 91 octane could be a cocktail that includes avgas (100 octane) that has passed its "use by" date, with added diesel/furnace oil etc.. to bring octane back to 91.

I use 98 myself, but have no prob with 95 if I cant get 98. I would rather not put 91 in the bike...car runs fine on it though!!!!

homer
29th December 2008, 14:02
the most harm you will do with low octane fuel is get a little pinking in the engine .
most engines these days and back to early 90s as these are modern engines to , you will find will run perfectly well down to 87 octane.
the thought that a low octane fuel will reduce performance is not quite correct.
search posts on here theres lots of info .
run the bike on what it sounds and runs best on .
before a lot of post in regards to this that ive just posted, i suggest go read your owners manual in the fuel requirements first.

Max Preload
29th December 2008, 14:51
the most harm you will do with low octane fuel is get a little pinking in the engine

'Pinking' is such an innocuous and dainty name. Let's call it what it is - detonation - which, if it occurs at high rpm, can quickly destroy the engine and if present at lower rpm will at the very least significantly reduce engine life.

It makes no difference as to whether a bike is fuel injected or otherwise as to whether it will cope better with detonation. I believe you're confused as to the function of a knock sensor - do any bikes actually have knock sensors to retard ignition timing if detonation occurs? I suspect not, since they've only just had closed loop fuel injection in the last couple of years, a feature on cars since the mid-80's.

xwhatsit
29th December 2008, 15:30
I don't think octane rating has much to do with using around twice the amount of fuel you should use. P.S. use the lowest octane your engine can cope with without pinking; higher octane fuels burn slower (that's why they are more detonation-resistance) and the octane rating has little to do with the calorific value.

You sure it's not leaking fuel somewhere? That's horrific mileage. Did somebody botch the carbs when they `tuned' it for the aftermarket silencer?

crystalball
29th December 2008, 16:21
:doctor: Well thanks for helping guys. There is no fuel leak as no smell off petrol and cant see petrol anywhere. I had a tuneup few weeks ago the bike runs fine but yes I will be asking the bike workshop that few others have siad to run it on 95. he reakons that this was the cause off the bike not running smoothly.I'll have a look at the air filter as well. Thanks for all your advice i'll be mentioning these ides as well.:niceone:

The Pastor
29th December 2008, 19:01
sounds like a leak mate, or your running it waaaay to rich. (or its tuned to the hilt and puts out a bazillion more hp than stock).

But i still gotta ask, how big is the tank?

homer
29th December 2008, 19:43
sounds like a leak mate, or your running it waaaay to rich. (or its tuned to the hilt and puts out a bazillion more hp than stock).

But i still gotta ask, how big is the tank?

thats a good point to , and very possibly is running to rich .
especially if the fuel economy is noticeable in regards to the km your getting .
it could also appear to use a lot of fuel dependant on the size of the tank.

crystalball
29th December 2008, 22:03
:gob:The tank is huge lol. mind you it cost me $17.60 to fill up from when the fuel light came on. Well after I get other problems sorted lol i'll get it checked out might just need a carb balance and clean, float levels e.t.c air filter clean,( I can do air filter that must be easy:sweatdrop) and yes could be runnin rich but dont think it is as I cant smell fuel. No leak tho. but 1st getting rear cush drive in january fitted already paid for the part( to help soften that clunky gear changing the kawaks have lol.) then fork seals replaced in jan as well.

shafty
29th December 2008, 22:54
Mate, your model is prolly a bit thirsty, but my Pan Euro does 18km/L no probs, and a 29 litre tank has seen me throw 55 bucks in at the Coro Loop stations with the (previously stupid) gas prices....

Tone165
30th December 2008, 00:46
to use that much fuel has got to be more than running a little rich. Does it blow black smoke???

Taz
30th December 2008, 06:01
$17.60 equates to 13 litres. half of 13 litres is 6.5 litres, 86km divided by 6.5l = 13.23 Km/l If you consider half full being half way to where the fuel light comes on. This is not very scientific as you say the bike used half a tank of gas and do supply any info on how many litres it took to fill from this point. What I'd suggest is that you reset the trip meter every time you fill up and record the distance travelled at the next fill, divide this distance by the number of litres it took to fill and that is your Km/l. Much more accurate than looking in the tank and guessing where half full really is as due to tank shape what looks like half full may really not be.
Andy.

crystalball
30th December 2008, 15:43
:drinkup: Yes well here i'll try this way. Well filled it up while sitting on it (more gas) then headed for Huntly 86km there and about 80km on way back :ride:
just befor papakura offramp those red sirens go off :weird: hmm :eek: wow better get to fuel station lol. 86 + 80 = 166 when i looked in tank at gas staion it looked like there was still fuel at bottom but not sure on how many km still in it but looked really low. took me about 10mins to get to a open petrol station in papakura. Then yay back to pakuranga. But yes your right its hard to judge how much petrol is in there by looking at it.$17.60 is probaly about what it cost to get there and back. Just seems to me that if i want to go on a long trip ( tauranga) im gona have to stop on the way and get petrol or im not going to make it. seems a little annoying. gona put 95 in when shes low next time, I know wont be any difference with fuel saving but sounds like it will be healthier. If she doesint like it back to 91. Will look at those problems like I said still tho.

NO BLACK SMOKE COMMING OUT.:headbang:

Max Preload
30th December 2008, 18:43
...filled it up while sitting on it (more gas)

You shouldn't do that. Although highly unlikely, there is a small chance if you have a spill and it gets onto the headers and you it could burst into flames and in the panic to get off you too could also end up bursting into flames.

crystalball
30th December 2008, 20:44
Yes I always take very much care off not to spill any petrol on the bike or me. Always make sure put petrol pump back carefully as well. Thanks for your concern tho i'll keep it in mind.:sherlock:

Howsie
7th January 2009, 19:50
its helpful to know just how far you can go on a tank of gas. Do as suggested and record your total kms per tank for a few tanks to get a good idea of how many km/litre you can do. Then multiply this figure by how many litres your fuel tank can hold. This figure is approx how far you can go (in kms) before you run dry.

Of course how twisty your wrist is affects this to a large degree :msn-wink:

PHATVW
9th January 2009, 15:15
I've got a 1993 Kawasaki ZXR250C, get around 180km before I have to fill up. Most of the time I fill it up with 98 and seems to be quite happy.

At 100km/hr, 6th gear sits at around 9,000rpm. Not sure if this is normal though :chase:

quickbuck
17th January 2009, 20:00
At 100km/hr, 6th gear sits at around 9,000rpm. Not sure if this is normal though :chase:

Perfectly normal.

shafty
17th January 2009, 22:45
perfectly normal.

bugger!............