Log in

View Full Version : UK National Motorcycle Strategy unveiled



Bob
23rd February 2005, 01:16
David Jamieson, parliamentary under secretary of state for transport, has unveiled plans for the first National Motorcycle Strategy. The strategy was launched at a meeting of the National Motorcycle Council on 22nd February.

The strategy recognises that an increasing number of people are turning to motorcycles and scooters in order to beat congestion as well as riding bikes for enjoyment and recreation. It is the result of five year’s work between government and the motorcycling community and takes account of the recommendations made to Government by the Advisory Group on Motorcycling.

The Strategy's core aims are to ensure:

· motorcycling is recognised as a mainstream mode of transport
· transport planning and infrastructure decisions fully take motorcycling into account
· motorcycle design continues to improve
· the attitudes and behaviour of both drivers and motorcyclists is focused on looking out for each other
· pre-test and post-test training continues to improve, making it attractive to riders
· the motorcycle test is reviewed, including a review of the delivery of the Direct Access Scheme

Mr Jamieson said "This is the first national motorcycling strategy and clearly demonstrates the Government's commitment to addressing the concerns of bikers, ensuring that the needs of motorcyclists are fully considered when making future decisions.”

"For the first time we have a framework of actions to be pursued over the next few years. Working together with the government, the motorcycle industry and motorcycle user groups can help to ensure that motorcycling becomes fully recognised and catered for as a means of transport on our roads."

Craig Carey-Clinch, Motor Cycle Industry Association (MCI) Director of Public Affairs added:

"The industry is delighted to welcome this extremely important step in motorcycle policy development. Now that National Motorcycle Strategy is in place, we can move forward and further develop policies which can improve safety, access and security for motorcycle users."

Frank Finch, motorcycle director of the Retail Motor Industry Federation said it signals the government's commitment to properly integrate motorcycling within UK transport policy "The strategy has received widespread support from motorcycle retailers, rider trainers, rider groups, and UK motorcycle manufacturers. All of these groups worked together leading up to the launch of the strategy, and the RMI will continue to be a key player in ensuring that the strategy is delivered," he promised.

"The delivery mechanism is the next important hurdle. Plans are already in place to ensure that government and the motorcycling community work closely together to fulfil their respective pledges," he said.

The full publication “The Government’s Motorcycling Strategy” can be found on the Department’s website at http://www.dft.gov.uk

Footnote: The Advisory Group on Motorcycling’s membership included the motorcycle industry, retailers, user groups, motoring associations, local government and the police. They submitted a report to Government in August 2004. The report contained 16 suggestions and 38 recommendations. These were made in the context of detailed advice to Government on safety, vehicle design, integration and traffic management, environmental and fiscal issues, statistics and research.

bear
23rd February 2005, 08:54
Well, you've got to be happy with that, hopefully it makes a real difference and isn't just the politicians trying to be nice and won't end up delivering.

Hitcher
23rd February 2005, 09:22
Wow, That's enlightened. I wonder if our transport policy wonks here will form a similar view...

Bob
23rd February 2005, 10:05
Well I've still got to have a proper read of the 52 page document (thankfully, there are pictures to break it up... :laugh: ), but doing the "Cliffe Notes" thing and flicking through the action points, it really does look like HM Gov't have put something useful together. There are time targets for implimentation, who is supposed to be working on them... it really does look well thought out and there is obvious input from the motorcycle groups.

So well done all round from what I can see so far.

I think there may well be one casualty though - the Direct Access training/licence scheme. For those of you who don't know about this, in the UK (and there are variations on a theme in the rest of Europe) once you pass your full test, you are restricted to 33 bhp for the first 2 years of full licence, before moving on to any capacity bike you want.

BUT, if you are over 21, you can bypass all of this by taking what is called "Direct Access". This means you take training and then a test on a bike of over 47bhp (excuse me if I'm slightly wonky on the bhp figure here) - which realistically translates as something like a GS500, or ER-5 or CB500. This then means you do not have the licence restriction and can buy and ride anything you want.

According to what I read, there are real concerns about the relationship between riders using this legal 'loophole' and accident figures.

I know the EU legislation is looking to increase DA minimum age to 24 (or possibly even 26). But I think it also might be possible to close down DA altogether, given that the EU are prepared to make allowances... and stricter limits are far more likely to be accepted than less stringent ones.

Personally, I won't be surprised if Direct Access bites the bullet. I am surprised that a law is in place, but there is a deliberately established legal loophole put in place... by the same government that put the 2 year, 33bhp limit there to begin with.

But we shall see.

I wonder - given your comments, if it would be worth printing off a copy of the document (it is easy to spot on the DfT website - link is there on my initial posting) and handing it to either a pro-biking politician, or a lobbying group or two and see what they think.

You never know, it might just get something similar happening there.

Be interesting to find out...

ManDownUnder
23rd February 2005, 10:40
Wow, That's enlightened. I wonder if our transport policy wonks here will form a similar view...

Bloody cynic!

Well justified of course... but damned cynical all the same.

I think what we should do is follow the lead of our education system advisors

Step one... dismiss outright ALL research done in any other countries as not applicable
Step two... dismiss all previous research done in NZ as not applicable
Step three find a consultant to form the heart of a consultative committee who can then put recommendations to a working party that will make non binding decisions based on a apparently unrelated set of facts
Step four, open the taxpayers purse and finally...
Step five, add money - lots of it!

Hey - I think I just outlined a new M/C transit policy (that'll be $50,000 please)
MDU

TonyB
23rd February 2005, 11:03
Well that was a pleasant surprise. I was expecting something aimed at getting 'dangerous' (ie all) motorcycles off the road. It seems, on the face of it, to be quite sensible. Sadly we tend to follow Australias lead, maybe we can make a difference if this report is shown to the powers that be?

TwoSeven
23rd February 2005, 11:50
Good to see the UK government do something good for a change.

See what can happen if you dont let Ken Livingstone get invovled :)

betti
23rd February 2005, 20:03
call me cynical, but isnt there an election this year back in blighty?.
All votes are good, even nasty, dangerous biker votes :2thumbsup

Biff
24th February 2005, 16:32
The new transport secretary is a good man to have on side for the UK biking community.

However I am astounded by the fact (well not really) that bikes aren't already considered during the design process for roads.

Bob
24th February 2005, 23:50
Well that was a pleasant surprise. I was expecting something aimed at getting 'dangerous' (ie all) motorcycles off the road. It seems, on the face of it, to be quite sensible. Sadly we tend to follow Australias lead, maybe we can make a difference if this report is shown to the powers that be?

Well if anyone does want to show the report to the powers that be, this is a direct link to the full document:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/documents/page/dft_roads_035439.pdf

If you do pass it on, I (and I'm guessing everyone else that read and replied to this) would love to hear the response.