Log in

View Full Version : Math question...



TwoSeven
23rd February 2005, 18:05
How do you calculate how much liquid will flow thru a pipe ?

I have a pipe that is 5mm long and an i.d. of 2.5mm I need to work out how much liquid (assume water for now) will flow thru at normal air pressure and temp.

I need to know the formula, not the answer.

:)

jrandom
23rd February 2005, 18:17
Google for 'fluid dynamics'.

Here's something from the list returned:

http://www.jgsee.kmutt.ac.th/exell/Thermo/AddPhysics.htm

Should give you what you need.

Hitcher
23rd February 2005, 18:48
How do you calculate how much liquid will flow thru a pipe ?

I have a pipe that is 5mm long and an i.d. of 2.5mm I need to work out how much liquid (assume water for now) will flow thru at normal air pressure and temp.

I need to know the formula, not the answer.
That's not a pipe, it's a pigeon's leg ring!

At "normal air pressure" (presumably 1 atmosphere) no liquid will flow through. The pipe is sufficiently small for capilliary attraction to be significant in a low pressure application. This will become more significant as the viscosity of the liquid increases (more of a problem for oil than water). In practical terms this pipe is so short the formula you should be using would be to calculate fluid flow through an orifice.

I am busy rummaging for my agricultural engineering notes. I used to know all of this stuff and it should be lying around here somewhere...

jrandom
23rd February 2005, 18:52
That's not a pipe, it's a pigeon's leg ring!

Yes, but the first chapter of this semester's textbook starts with "Consider a liquid pigeon's leg..."

Hitcher
23rd February 2005, 18:58
Found it. You need to use the extended Bernoulli equation:

Rather than type if for you, follow this link. It looks the same as in my old notes.

http://www.engineersedge.com/fluid_flow/extended_bernoulli.htm
<!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" o:preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/> <v:formulas> <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/> </v:formulas> <v:path o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/> <o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/> </v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='width:290.25pt; height:34.5pt'> <v:imagedata src="file:///C:/DOCUME~1/MRHITC~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/msoclip1/01/clip_image001.gif" o:href="http://www.engineersedge.com/fluid_flow/images/extend15.gif"/> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]-->
But I still think that the pipe is too small (length and diameter) for any calculations based on this formula to be valid.
<!--[endif]-->

Jantar
23rd February 2005, 19:25
Found it. You need to use the extended Bernoulli equation:

But I still think that the pipe is too small (length and diameter) for any calculations based on this formula to be valid.
<!--[endif]-->[/font]


You are quite right, the pipe IS too small. Liquid will only flow through due to capilliary action unless it is driven by a pressure or head differential.

Liquid will flow from an area of higher pressure to one of lower presure through a small pipe. In this case where you state normal air pressure and temp, I assume that means the liquid is discharging to air. It still needs a head to drive the liquid into the pipe.

The velocity at which liquid will travel into and through this pipe is given by the formula V = sqrt(2*G*H)
Where V is Velocity measured in m/s
G is Gravity at 9.81 m/s^2
H is the effective head (how far is the intake below the surface of the liquid) measured in m

Once you know the velocity, then the total flow is simply velocity * cross sectional area of the pipe. Roughness co-efficient and viscosity can be neglected as the total pipe length is less than 5 times its diameter.


I hope this helps.

TwoSeven
23rd February 2005, 21:50
Cheers folks..

Pigeon leg ring ? orifice ?? liquid pigeons leg ?

You mean the person measuring the pigeons ass forgot it was still full of shit :)

ching_ching
23rd February 2005, 22:20
You are quite right, the pipe IS too small. Liquid will only flow through due to capilliary action unless it is driven by a pressure or head differential.

Liquid will flow from an area of higher pressure to one of lower presure through a small pipe. In this case where you state normal air pressure and temp, I assume that means the liquid is discharging to air. It still needs a head to drive the liquid into the pipe.

The velocity at which liquid will travel into and through this pipe is given by the formula V = sqrt(2*G*H)
Where V is Velocity measured in m/s
G is Gravity at 9.81 m/s^2
H is the effective head (how far is the intake below the surface of the liquid) measured in m

Once you know the velocity, then the total flow is simply velocity * cross sectional area of the pipe. Roughness co-efficient and viscosity can be neglected as the total pipe length is less than 5 times its diameter.


I hope this helps.

Fucking Hell!!! :spudwhat:

Hitcher
24th February 2005, 08:00
Cheers folks..

Pigeon leg ring ? orifice ?? liquid pigeons leg ?

You mean the person measuring the pigeons ass forgot it was still full of shit :)
The pigeon's arse, thank you.

BDOTGNZA are we!

vifferman
24th February 2005, 08:05
The pigeon's arse, thank you.

BDOTGNZA are we!
Maybe the pigeon had an ass (or donkey, or mule) for a pet? :spudwhat:
Or for transport (it was a lazy pigeon).

XTC
24th February 2005, 08:20
The pigeon's arse, thank you.

BDOTGNZA are we!
Jeez hitcher you really like your arse's dont you?

ManDownUnder
24th February 2005, 08:45
I've heard of some people being as tight as a snapper's arse...

and other being arseholes!

... glad we don't have any of either around here !!!!!

Hitcher
24th February 2005, 08:47
Jeez hitcher you really like your arse's dont you?
Somebody has to make a stand against keeping naff Americanisms out of our language. And why not start with the arse!

Sniper
24th February 2005, 08:51
Well I stand with Hitcher. It is arse, and not ass. An ass is a donkey foul mouthed heathens