PDA

View Full Version : Product labels



Sniper
17th March 2005, 07:56
Only in America as this artical states....

Strange Product Warnings

You've been warned - no matter how ridiculous that warning might appear.

On dog treats, toilet seats, scooters and almost every product imaginable, companies are protecting themselves from lawsuits - or just plain clueless consumers - with a never-ending supply of disclaimers.

Take, for instance, the warning label tagged onto a sporty children's scooter.
"This product moves when used."

Although the overwhelming majority of consumers would, you can only hope, react with a "Well, duh" to that revelation, companies aren't taking any chances.

So male users of certain prescription drugs are urged to "contact your doctor" - and not the Guinness Book of World Records - if they're somehow afflicted with a four-hour erection.
And buyers of the Hartz Meaty Knuckle Bones are reminded that the tasty treat is "not for human consumption" - just in case that picture of the pooch on the front of the package isn't warning enough.

My all-time favorite has to be the warning on the drill that says, 'Warning: Not intended for use as a dental

The watchdog group annually conducts a wacky warning labels contest to draw attention to how fear of litigation has led American companies to call for caution among consumers when common sense used to be enough.
This year's winner was a toilet brush that warns "DO NOT USE FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE."

But obviously someone out there does, because the Daily News found these no-brainers on city store shelves:
Those black rubber fishing worms certainly look tasty to gullible fish. But there's a "Not for human consumption" warning - just in case humans develop an appetite for them.

The instructions order users of Depend adult diapers to "step into underwear and pull them on just like regular underwear." A handy illustration of the feet-first technique is added. Well, that settles that. Now no normal adult will ever think of slipping diapers on over the head.

A package of "Furniture Wipes" wants to make it more than clear when it warns, "Do not use for a baby wipe."

Never mind that the piggy bank is 8 inches long and about as wide a human thigh - it still merits being labeled a choking hazard. Perhaps for a large-mouthed animal with refined reading skills?

Just sit there, and don't mess around. That's the order from the makers of a potty training toilet that includes packet of stickers to slap on the seat. "This is not a toy," the package says. "Stickers require adult supervision."

MSTRS
17th March 2005, 08:28
Should babysitters come with a warning label too? One that states that they 'Do not sit on babies'?

Maximus
17th March 2005, 08:29
Should babysitters come with a warning label too? One that states that they 'Do not sit on babies'?


Hehe, you been drinking already mate? :spudbooge

MSTRS
17th March 2005, 08:33
Hehe, you been drinking already mate? :spudbooge
It's raining here today, so I took a guess as regards the yardarm?

Maximus
17th March 2005, 08:37
It's raining here today, so I took a guess as regards the yardarm?


. . . . . Did someone say "thread pirating" :p

Oh well Im of to the pub . . . :banana:

Biff
17th March 2005, 08:50
I was on an aeroplane recently, and was served the customary in flight drink and packet of peanuts. I was relieved to see that written on the peanut packet was, "Warning - may contain traces of nuts". Glad they warned me. :brick:

Marmoot
17th March 2005, 09:18
Should babysitters come with a warning label too? One that states that they 'Do not sit on babies'?

Babysitters? I'd say it should be "Do not use when wife is around"

:yeah:

Sniper
17th March 2005, 10:29
Babysitters? I'd say it should be "Do not use when wife is around"

:yeah:

You would know?

bugjuice
17th March 2005, 10:34
Babysitters? I'd say it should be "Do not use when wife is around"

:yeah:
lol... you been watching Nip/Tuck?
(or in my house 'Quick fuk'.. cos that seems to be most of the show.. not that that is a bad thing..)

Marmoot
17th March 2005, 16:54
You would know?

uh.....don't really know....haven't got a baby so can't hire babysitter without being to obvious to my missus.
:sunny:

Ixion
17th March 2005, 17:04
uh.....don't really know....haven't got a baby so can't hire babysitter without being to obvious to my missus.
:sunny:

So ? Hire the baby first. :niceone: