Log in

View Full Version : Just got into Hot Bike Bagger!



Tricky Air
23rd May 2009, 05:11
Our new Harley Bagger Front Air Forks made it into the July issue of Hot Bike Bagger! The article was about the 52 Hottest new things to have on your Bagger, our Front End was number 15! The bike is our friends Road King, it rides low with our front and rear air rides, it's also got Ape hangers and a supercharger. This thing is boss hoss! (the pictures could have been bigger, but we'll take it!)

www.trickyair.com

scumdog
23rd May 2009, 11:57
Not so keen on those extended swing-arm 'sports' bikes - kinda ruins the cornering ability I bet,the chops look ok though, very cool.

So where is the blown bagger pics?

YellowDog
23rd May 2009, 12:09
The pics are here: www.trickyair.com

Not by cup of tea, but I can see the aesthetic appeal.

Muppet
23rd May 2009, 15:31
What's a bagger?

scumdog
23rd May 2009, 15:38
What's a bagger?

In H_D speak it's a big 'ol lardy-arsed tourer with....side-bags.

In this case I wonder if they mean air-bags since that is what the hot-rod set call their ait-suspension.

popelli
23rd May 2009, 17:49
Our new Harley Bagger Front Air Forks made it into the July issue of Hot Bike Bagger! The article was about the 52 Hottest new things to have on your Bagger, our Front End was number 15! The bike is our friends Road King, it rides low with our front and rear air rides, it's also got Ape hangers and a supercharger. This thing is boss hoss! (the pictures could have been bigger, but we'll take it!)

www.trickyair.com

Thinly veiled blatant advertising is what I read into this

I can understand the appeal of lowering the back end for looks, but to me most custom bikes have extended raked out front ends rather than short stubby forks - I still have and read all my chopper mags form the 70's

The original rationale behind longer front ends (2"-4") was increased clearance for corners and increased trail for high speed stability

However lowering a front end will reduce cornering clearance and make a bike more unstable at speed

peasea
23rd May 2009, 22:36
Not so keen on those extended swing-arm 'sports' bikes - kinda ruins the cornering ability I bet,the chops look ok though, very cool.

So where is the blown bagger pics?

That's extremely bad English; it should be "where ARE the blown bagger pics?" Sheesh. Talk about dumbing down.

peasea
23rd May 2009, 22:37
Thinly veiled blatant advertising is what I read into this

I can understand the appeal of lowering the back end for looks, but to me most custom bikes have extended raked out front ends rather than short stubby forks - I still have and read all my chooper mags form the 70's

The original rationale behind longer front ends (2"-4") was increased clearance for corners and increased trail for high speed stability

However lowering a front end will reduce cornering clearance and make a bike more unstable at speed

What's a 'chooper'?

peasea
23rd May 2009, 22:39
In H_D speak it's a big 'ol lardy-arsed tourer with....side-bags.

In this case I wonder if they mean air-bags since that is what the hot-rod set call their ait-suspension.

ait suspension? Where do you buy that? Or more importantly, where do you put it?

scumdog
24th May 2009, 05:33
That's extremely bad English; it should be "where ARE the blown bagger pics?" Sheesh. Talk about dumbing down.

Hey, who made YOU Hitcher?<_<

scumdog
24th May 2009, 05:33
ait suspension? Where do you buy that? Or more importantly, where do you put it?

I'll give you a clue.....:shifty:

Pixie
24th May 2009, 08:46
What's a bagger?

A bike so ridiculous you feel the need to put a bag over it in public.

Now a 2 bagger is......

NighthawkNZ
24th May 2009, 09:20
Not so keen on those extended swing-arm 'sports' bikes - kinda ruins the cornering ability

and the look ugly/silly to boot.. they just look wrong

cowpatz
24th May 2009, 10:27
It is just an artistic expression and another type of Phallic jousting. Not a practical piece of machinery at all.

AllanB
24th May 2009, 11:15
Good for you mate - it must give you a sense of pride being in publication.

I find the baggers kind of cool.
Lets admit it, Harley has founded one of the worlds most successful businesses on a 'look' the bagger is just a variation of the look. Personally it's a nice variation to Harleys clones of Harley (think about it) I see most days.

It's good to modify ya bikes.

dipshit
24th May 2009, 12:29
and the look ugly/silly to boot.. they just look wrong

Surely you jest..??

No, Americans must have the most tackiest poor taste of anybody in the world. It is truly mind-boggling the crap they can come out with! Yet they think they are sooo cooool. :tugger:

peasea
24th May 2009, 12:42
Surely you jest..??

No, Americans must have the most tackiest poor taste of anybody in the world. It is truly mind-boggling the crap they can come out with! Yet they think they are sooo cooool. :tugger:

"Most tackiest"? Cringe, terrible English, however; you have to hand it to them for sticking their collective necks out, even if a few do get shot to shit from time to time.

I know the shuttle has gone bang once or twice but it's still an awesome concept and they get that right more than they get it wrong.

I'll agree with you though; they do tend think a lot of themselves and generally speaking they're aren't the brightest buttons on the cardigan are they? Not very resourceful or ingenious in the main and when it comes to custom motorcycles their bikes often look like the bike down the road because all the parts came from the same store. Making shit is where it's at.

dipshit
24th May 2009, 13:11
I know the shuttle has gone bang once or twice but it's still an awesome concept and they get that right more than they get it wrong.

I remember watching a biker build-off on sky once... an American, an Englishman and an Australian. The Aussie and English guy were real talented craftsmen hand beating stainless steel to a flawless finish etc. The American used heaps of bog filler on his bike. :slap:

The other two builders looked closely as his bike at the show and muttered "how on earth did Americans ever manage to land on the moon?"

cowpatz
24th May 2009, 14:46
Big, loud and in your face...America 101.

peasea
24th May 2009, 15:46
I remember watching a biker build-off on sky once... an American, an Englishman and an Australian. The Aussie and English guy were real talented craftsmen hand beating stainless steel to a flawless finish etc. The American used heaps of bog filler on his bike. :slap:

The other two builders looked closely as his bike at the show and muttered "how on earth did Americans ever manage to land on the moon?"

I remember that. The tank was aluminium (or aluminum if you're American) and you're so right about the finish. The Yank bike was a bunch of parts off the shelf etc. That Ozzie bike shoulda won hands down and I could see great merit in the Pommy machine.

It was all about bling, not talent, on that show!

dipshit
24th May 2009, 16:02
It was all about bling, not talent, on that show!

That's American wank culture for you. So long as it looks "cool" cruising up and down sunset strip. Function and practicality and been made to last means absolutely nothing. Just bullshit.

dipshit
24th May 2009, 16:12
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2-Motorcycle-Tire-Tread-Marker-Paint-Pen-GSXR-CBR-R1-R6_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ34284QQihZ013QQitemZ 230332045126QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWDVW


And here's one of the latest trends for the land of the tasteless posers.

peasea
24th May 2009, 17:43
Now now, not all of them are tasteless. Haven't you seen the movie Mississippi Burning?

Tricky Air
26th May 2009, 04:47
Thinly veiled blatant advertising is what I read into this

I can understand the appeal of lowering the back end for looks, but to me most custom bikes have extended raked out front ends rather than short stubby forks - I still have and read all my chopper mags form the 70's

The original rationale behind longer front ends (2"-4") was increased clearance for corners and increased trail for high speed stability

However lowering a front end will reduce cornering clearance and make a bike more unstable at speed
We're doing our fronts with a 5 degree rake, that way we can run with a 23 inch wheel up front, it's not "chopper", but it ain't grampa's ol' bagger either. The one in the mag has ape hangers too, it's pretty wicked.

And yeah, you could call it thinly veiled advertisement, but I don't mind blastin' our own horn, we work hard to get our bikes in those mags, we don't pay cash to get in like everybody else!

Tricky Air
26th May 2009, 04:52
Not so keen on those extended swing-arm 'sports' bikes - kinda ruins the cornering ability I bet,the chops look ok though, very cool.

So where is the blown bagger pics?
Well, the extended swing arm bikes are for drag racing, not a daily rider thing. Are rear kits are pretty popular with Busa Draggers, they help dampen some of the torque off the mark, helps keep the front from lifting...

Tricky Air
26th May 2009, 05:10
ait suspension? Where do you buy that? Or more importantly, where do you put it?
Man it's weird answering everyone at once, but I'm half a world away, wadaya want!

Anyway, to answer you, air suspension is just shocks that work on air pressure that replace conventional shocks. They can give you a softer ride than conventionals if used properly and if you choose they can be used to ride your bike low. Here in the states a lot of custom chopper builders use them. They're popular with sport bike riders too, since they often ride a little high for some tastes.

In New Zealand there are currently no dealers who sell our product, although I am working out the logistics right now with Colemans Suzuki in Auckland. You can call Dan, he's the Parts Manager there, tell him you're interested, he can do something for you. Other than that you can buy direct from us or the next closest dealer which is Anderson Custom Cycles in Australia.

Tricky Air
26th May 2009, 05:32
Ouch! You guys are punching below the belt! I'll admit, we have more than our fair share of Douche Bags in the states, but we're not ALL egotistical posers over here. Whenever we get orders in for our product here, we cut the raw material and machine the product ourselves. And right now I've got two great project i'm working on... I'm building a little "Bobber" out of an old Kawasaki, and I'm putting together a Ratrod on a 64 Chevy truck frame and I'm not doing it with parts off of a shelf!

peasea
26th May 2009, 06:44
Man it's weird answering everyone at once, but I'm half a world away, wadaya want!

Anyway, to answer you, air suspension is just shocks that work on air pressure that replace conventional shocks. They can give you a softer ride than conventionals if used properly and if you choose they can be used to ride your bike low. Here in the states a lot of custom chopper builders use them. They're popular with sport bike riders too, since they often ride a little high for some tastes.

In New Zealand there are currently no dealers who sell our product, although I am working out the logistics right now with Colemans Suzuki in Auckland. You can call Dan, he's the Parts Manager there, tell him you're interested, he can do something for you. Other than that you can buy direct from us or the next closest dealer which is Anderson Custom Cycles in Australia.

Thanks for the post but I know all about air suspension, I was taking the piss out of the incorrect spelling of the word 'air'. The people who are most likely to give you a hard time around here are sports bike riders who just don't understand..........anything at all. If their right hand isn't on the throttle it's usually on something else.:rofl:

gatch
26th May 2009, 09:15
FUCK ! It seems like noone knows what chopper actually means..

"Chopper" refers originally to post world war army indians that have been "chopped" and welded back together to individualise them, and can also mean "chopped back" as in stripped back to nothing but the bare essentials..

My honda spada is more of a chopper than these shit box OCC clones.

Edit - Sorry for hijacking your thread, just so many douche bags cash in on the chopper theme without a clue as to what they are advertising..

Tricky Air
27th May 2009, 02:19
FUCK ! It seems like noone knows what chopper actually means..

"Chopper" refers originally to post world war army indians that have been "chopped" and welded back together to individualise them, and can also mean "chopped back" as in stripped back to nothing but the bare essentials..

My honda spada is more of a chopper than these shit box OCC clones.

Edit - Sorry for hijacking your thread, just so many douche bags cash in on the chopper theme without a clue as to what they are advertising..
Well, you're right that is how they STARTED. However, like most things they have evolved over time. Whether or not you agree with it "chopper" is going to be the term used to describe a custom american or metric cruiser with some kind of front rake. We now describe the vintage 40's/50's style custom with a mild to no rake at all as "Bobbers", which was another word thrown around back then to describe the original choppers. Things change my friend, cars no longer run on the steam engines they were designed with more than a hundred years ago, but we call them cars none the less. Thanks for your angry history lesson though!

HenryDorsetCase
27th May 2009, 20:11
"Most tackiest"? Cringe, terrible English, however; you have to hand it to them for sticking their collective necks out, even if a few do get shot to shit from time to time.

I know the shuttle has gone bang once or twice but it's still an awesome concept and they get that right more than they get it wrong.

I'll agree with you though; they do tend think a lot of themselves and generally speaking they're aren't the brightest buttons on the cardigan are they? Not very resourceful or ingenious in the main and when it comes to custom motorcycles their bikes often look like the bike down the road because all the parts came from the same store. Making shit is where it's at.

the last Atlantis mission was STS125: they've lost only two and its about the most sophisticated machine we monkeys have built. I think thats amazing. The big problem with a shuttle is the consequence of even small failures are catastrophic.

peasea
27th May 2009, 20:15
the last Atlantis mission was STS125: they've lost only two and its about the most sophisticated machine we monkeys have built. I think thats amazing. The big problem with a shuttle is the consequence of even small failures are catastrophic.

So right; pass the 'o' rings Joey!