View Full Version : Riffer's @ 15
Big Dave
23rd May 2009, 17:21
Who'd a thunk it - 15. I don't think I saw one till I moved here.
http://kiwiridermagazine.blogspot.com/2009/05/looking-back-51015-years-ago.html
Skyryder
23rd May 2009, 17:26
I can remember as a kid when the world record was set on Tram Rd.
Any one know where the memorial is on Tram Rd??
Skyryder
Big Dave
23rd May 2009, 18:41
I don't even know where Tram Road is!
Well frick I know where Tram Road is, I know about the record, I know about RF900s and over 15 years ago I bought my VFR750F brand new. The last of the carburettored V4 Hondas..... beautiful!!! :msn-wink:
God I've been around a while :jerry:
tri boy
23rd May 2009, 20:32
Tonight I've been flicking through some Two wheels mags circa 1980-84.
Names like Kel Wearne, Lester morris,Bill McKinnon,Anthony Seymour etc were the boys back then.
Time is slowly ticking on. Dave, did you know any of those guys back then?
Big Dave
23rd May 2009, 21:17
Nah - next generation.
Graeme Morris and Rusty Howard.
warewolf
25th May 2009, 16:14
Who'd a thunk it - 15. I don't think I saw one till I moved here.Dave Dave Dave Dave Dave... You need to get out more. :msn-wink: Saw heaps of them in Aussie. Very well respected bike back in the day.
Colapop
25th May 2009, 16:20
My old girl is still well respected... unlike the rider... :no:
Big Dave
25th May 2009, 16:24
Never saw one. And I had a Suzuki then too.
Remeber the first one I spotted - green unit of the floor at AMPS. Thought it was a sensible bike then.
banditrider
25th May 2009, 20:26
Had a green one meself. Great bike, did 3 GC's on it. Photo taken before digital cameras were invented...
TLDV8
26th May 2009, 11:14
Tonight I've been flicking through some Two wheels mags circa 1980-84.
Names like Kel Wearne, Lester morris,Bill McKinnon,Anthony Seymour etc were the boys back then.
Time is slowly ticking on. Dave, did you know any of those guys back then?
I remember reading in TW Suzuki were going to release a four stoke some years earlier.
There was one sitting in the show room at Coleman's when i went to put the deposit on my RM125.
<img src=http://www.scootershop.ru/catalog/img/s/history/gs750.jpg>
Folk were a little more excitable in those days :laugh: standing room only at F&D's to get a look at the CBX.
.
bistard
26th May 2009, 13:18
My old girl is still well respected... unlike the rider... :no:
Shit Col,is it still going, I should have charged you more, If I had known it was going to be that reliable !!!!
I remember owning an '87 GPz at the time they came out and thinking I preferred the GPz
ended up owning one a dozen years later lol
Headbanger
26th May 2009, 13:49
Why is it that every time the RF900 is mentioned its always nominated as being under rated?
I have only ever seen people rate them highly, and they are a damn fine looking bike as far as the ricer style of bike is concerned.
Fatjim
26th May 2009, 14:20
Well I under rate them.
Indiana_Jones
26th May 2009, 15:02
My old girl is still well respected... unlike the rider... :no:
That's not true baby! :love:
-Indy
banditrider
26th May 2009, 18:01
Why is it that every time the RF900 is mentioned its always nominated as being under rated?
I have only ever seen people rate them highly, and they are a damn fine looking bike as far as the ricer style of bike is concerned.
Guess those that ride them rate them and those that don't don't? For 11k brand new they were damn good value. I found it a really sweet handler that didn't mind rougher roads and it had more performance than I cold use. Down side was engine vibration at legal speed limit - got very sore joints in hands on the GC.
TLDV8
26th May 2009, 22:12
Guess those that ride them rate them and those that don't don't? For 11k brand new they were damn good value.
Someone can correct me if wrong.
I was told originally they cost a lot more than that new then Canadian imports were bought in and sold for the $11000, (less than a new RGV250 at the time) shafting those that had payed $1000's more prior.
warewolf
31st May 2009, 22:58
Why is it that every time the RF900 is mentioned its always nominated as being under rated?
I have only ever seen people rate them highly, and they are a damn fine looking bike as far as the ricer style of bike is concerned.Many people passed them over, purely because they weren't an uber sports bike. They're almost a newer version of the GSX-F. On the road, neither bike will hinder a good rider.
98tls
31st May 2009, 23:24
neither bike will hinder a good rider. :doh:Careful there mate your well close to denting the egos of many interweb motorcyclists,particulary the many Foggys that seem to lurk here.Attached to many bikes bought by KBers is a piece of paper that says "you own it therefore your granted the right to profess the ability to ride it on the Interweb":clap:
Headbanger
1st June 2009, 01:11
Many people passed them over, purely because they weren't an uber sports bike.
I figured that was the reasoning, But that would also apply to 99.9 percent of bikes on the road.
I'd have to wonder how many of these self-styled dare devils can ride their bikes in the upper limits they are capable of? Probably none. I'd guess most of them don't get anywhere close.
The Pastor
1st June 2009, 10:33
I figured that was the reasoning, But that would also apply to 99.9 percent of bikes on the road.
I'd have to wonder how many of these self-styled dare devils can ride their bikes in the upper limits they are capable of? Probably none. I'd guess most of them don't get anywhere close.
you should do some kb rides then ;)
warewolf
1st June 2009, 10:35
I figured that was the reasoning, But that would also apply to 99.9 percent of bikes on the road.It's human nature really, a vicious circle of desire and marketing. The media spends an inordinate amount of time on ultra sports bikes. If they waxed lyrical about less sports-focussed bikes, and treated the ultra sports as the exotica that they perhaps should be, then things might change. As it is now, quietly competent bikes like the RF (the TDM is another, there are lots) tend to be underrated. And I suspect that the broader the focus of the bike, the less favourable the reviews. Probably along the lines of good at everything, excellent at nothing, provides little material for sensationalist hyperbole.
I'd have to wonder how many of these self-styled dare devils can ride their bikes in the upper limits they are capable of? Probably none. I'd guess most of them don't get anywhere close.Some can, but most don't get close. Usually the notably bad riders are on sports bikes. People on less sporty bikes seem to ride better, if slower. Riding trail/adventure bikes on the road really highlights just how little of a sports bike's potential capability is used 99% of the time.
But I can also understand ppl wanting to ride a really sharp weapon.
Headbanger
1st June 2009, 11:16
Personally I'd buy something like an RF over a high end sports bike any day, Sacrificing comfort and ride ability for out right speed that can't be made use of is just a bit of a wank. (much like Harley owners trying to emulate the American dream but thats another story entirely)
I spent a day on a Hayabusa (granted it was comfortable and a beautiful bike to ride),and while it was capable of amazing things, riding it hard on the road was only using a fraction of what it could do.
Using anywhere near its capabilities on the road would get you killed within an hour or two even if you were one of the best riders in NZ.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.