Blog Comments

  1. rastuscat's Avatar
    Would you really prefer that they spent a zillion of the taxpayers bucks trying to prosecute them knowing that they would lose?
  2. korimako1's Avatar
    sorry Red Mermaid but I am sure you get the idea.
  3. red mermaid's Avatar
    Exceeding a speed limit is a regulatory offence and it is not necessary to prove intent therefore your hypothetical question does not apply.
  4. SPman's Avatar
    This decision was also ‘independently’ reviewed by none other than the QC who is also prosecuting Kim Dotcom.............
  5. willytheekid's Avatar
    Same!, not surprised...it must be hard to "try" and apply the law to your own boss!....especially if you boss is a known bully who thinks they are above the "common-mans" law, and can fuck your funding with a stroke of a pen!(never bite the hand that feeds you an all that...justice!...pffft, yeah right!*)

    ...same ol same for little america...I mean NZ
  6. Scuba_Steve's Avatar
    I would like to say I'm surprised... But that'd be a lie
  7. Berg's Avatar
    Thinking maybe my life insurance won't pay enough lol
  8. Gremlin's Avatar
    Berg, perhaps you should take it as a compliment
  9. korimako1's Avatar
    whoa cant think why.
  10. Berg's Avatar
    You did well. First year I went up I broke a hand, second yoer I broke my neck. Wife won't let me back for a third go