Would you really prefer that they spent a zillion of the taxpayers bucks trying to prosecute them knowing that they would lose?
sorry Red Mermaid but I am sure you get the idea.
Exceeding a speed limit is a regulatory offence and it is not necessary to prove intent therefore your hypothetical question does not apply.
This decision was also ‘independently’ reviewed by none other than the QC who is also prosecuting Kim Dotcom.............
Same!, not surprised...it must be hard to "try" and apply the law to your own boss!....especially if you boss is a known bully who thinks they are above the "common-mans" law, and can fuck your funding with a stroke of a pen!(never bite the hand that feeds you an all that...justice!...pffft, yeah right!*) ...same ol same for little america...I mean NZ
I would like to say I'm surprised... But that'd be a lie
Thinking maybe my life insurance won't pay enough lol
Berg, perhaps you should take it as a compliment
whoa cant think why.
You did well. First year I went up I broke a hand, second yoer I broke my neck. Wife won't let me back for a third go