hell yes i want power!!!
na i love my smoky cb125t
no, its too big of a motor
only if the 250's are 2 valve
chuck norris's calender goes from march 31st to april 2nd
No one fools chuck norris.......
PML this thread just keeps getting betterer and betterer!!!![]()
Keep ya PMS to yourself...
Please explain why. A 1000cc engine with a 24 mm carb wont produce any more power than a 125cc engine with a 24 mm carb. The power output of any engine is simply a fuction of how hard it can breathe multiplied by the pressure increase through heating the air that it is pumping through. limiting the intake and exhaust sizes puts a limit on the HP that can be produced, so why worry if someone wants to use a huge capacity to do that?
Time to ride
Kart tracks. Physical mass. Human ingenuity. Three reasons it's a bad idea. Mostly Buckets run on kart tracks. Much tighter than a race track so a small light bike has an advantage. Some 'wanker' will have a bight idea and stuff a 1000cc engine into an H100 and gain a 'unfair' advantage. It would either develop or kill the class. It's doing fine as it is.
I think a 1000cc with a 24mm carb will produce more than 15hp. Only one cylinder at a time will be breathing. Most 125's are single cylinder. So straight away you have a 250cc high torque engine breathing with a 24mm carb.
The same reasoning can be applied to 125 cc two stroke twins. With a properly designed intake manifold only one cylinder is breathing at a time so almost double the power could be produced. this is the same priciple that Burt Munroe applied to his Indian; a single carb supplying both cylinders.
Time to ride
Except the 125's are two stroke and the dynamics of the carb are more important and also (as a two stroke) everything happens twice as often.
Your Burt Munroe example is a good reason why NOT to allow it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks