When I look at David on the telly, I see either:
1. A not entirely innocent man
2. A man forced to re-live the pain of what happened to his family.
If David killed Robin and not the 4 others, then it would have had to have been in a struggle with Robin walking around / with the gun, potentially pointing at David, but then David could have claimed self defence.
The evidence I fully don't understand is the rifle that was used - Robin could not have pointed at his head and reached the trigger sufficiently as I understand. Unless Robin used a rig, someone else had to pull the trigger on him.
Bookmarks