Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 58

Thread: Building Code/Safety?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by cowpoos View Post
    I have an idea....how about you watch where your going...using your eyes...and take responsibility for your own actions?? and when you stuff up...don't blame someone else...LEARN from it!!

    Just like riding a bike??? wadddya fink?

    The one that nearly impacted my dandruff was leaving a Thai or Indian (I don't remember) Restaurant near the corner of Greenlane and Manukau Roads.

    Walking through the shoulder height passageway was cool entering.

    The overhanging stairs were not so noticable when leaving and quite well fucked up.

    I missed them, but commented at the time - in a brand new-ish building - 'Where is the building code here?'

  2. #32
    Join Date
    13th April 2007 - 17:09
    Bike
    18 Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,802
    Quote Originally Posted by Headbanger View Post
    They would have reduced the risk and perhaps saved there own lives if they had followed their obligations under current OSH law and carried out hazard identification and management and ensured proper practise was followed, and that capable people were in the right positions, Like the fuckin retard in the digger.
    Yes you are quite right. But if there were proper H & S systems in place these guys would never have been under the house in the first place. It ain't safe. Accidents happen and a digger going AWOL should not be enough to result in deaths.

    Fortunately Motorcycling has better safety standards.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post

    I missed them, but commented at the time - in a brand new-ish building - 'Where is the building code here?'
    That is odd...there are laws and guidelines on heights of objects etc...right down to heights of stair case rails etc...I'll see if I can find a few laws on that.

    but...you realise...your height is genetically superior when compared to the average Bob.
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by cowpoos View Post
    That is odd...there are laws and guidelines on heights of objects etc...right down to heights of stair case rails etc...I'll see if I can find a few laws on that.

    but...you realise...your height is genetically superior when compared to the average Bob.
    Here are PDF's to alot of the compliances to the building code.

    http://www.dbh.govt.nz/compliance-docs-get-copies

    as for references to height http://www.dbh.govt.nz/UserFiles/Fil.../clause-d1.pdf

    and

    http://www.dbh.govt.nz/codewords-28-7
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    25th May 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    Speed Triple
    Location
    Straya.....cunt
    Posts
    2,467
    Quote Originally Posted by YellowDog View Post
    Yes you are quite right. But if there were proper H & S systems in place these guys would never have been under the house in the first place. It ain't safe. Accidents happen and a digger going AWOL should not be enough to result in deaths.

    Fortunately Motorcycling has better safety standards.
    The systems are there, They ignored them. Its all in the health and safety act. Which they and the company they work for are lawfully bound to follow.

    If you want to compare it to riding bikes, Then its like doing 200km/h with no helmet and no brakes then blaming the laws you ignored for the resulting carnage. Would you do put yourself at risk like that for $15 an hour?

    The location of the digger should have been identified as a hazard and moved, as should the systems they had in place for jacking up the house, and the weather.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,242
    Quote Originally Posted by YellowDog View Post
    Yes you are quite right. But if there were proper H & S systems in place these guys would never have been under the house in the first place. It ain't safe. Accidents happen and a digger going AWOL should not be enough to result in deaths.

    Fortunately Motorcycling has better safety standards.
    tell me how you can lower a relocated building onto its new foundations without actually going under it?.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by cowpoos View Post
    That is odd...there are laws and guidelines on heights of objects etc...right down to heights of stair case rails etc...I'll see if I can find a few laws on that.

    but...you realise...your height is genetically superior when compared to the average Bob.
    Superior? - not for motorcycle racing - I guess there are codes - and there is adherence to the code, too.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Usarka View Post
    Here is a photo of the incident.
    New avatar dude.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    25th May 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    Speed Triple
    Location
    Straya.....cunt
    Posts
    2,467
    And based on what I just saw on TV, I'll take back all my assumptions and wait and see what the OSH investigation turns up.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    18th February 2008 - 17:34
    Bike
    Zooks 85 GS1100G and 84 GSX1100E
    Location
    North Shore, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    For around half a century (ever since they stopped using heart totara for framing) EVERYBODY who ever picked up a hammer knew you didn't use untreated pinus radiata for permanent work.

    Then some brain dead rooster in Wellington comes out and says "Oh, it's OK, all good to use untreated". Completely coincidental that a certain huge corporation made millions as a result of that decision of course. And EVERYBODY who ever picked up a hammer knew that it would inevitably end in tears. Just a matter of time. The chippies building those houses with untreated knew they would rot. Not their decision, and nobody would listen to them

    Every wooden framed house ever built leaks. Sooner or later. Timber needs to be rot resistant for as long as it take to dry out. Pretending that you can use untreated pinus and seal the building so tight that it never leaks is just bullshit.

    Got a leaky house? Blame an unholy alliance between that certain corporation and the Greens.

    And I am sure the door would not have been 30cm lower than standard. You'd have to be a dwarf to get through it. Maybe 3 cm , 30mm ?

    +1 for someone who appears to actually know something about the real issues.

    Quite correct, they always did and will leak. The issue is not that they leak... the real issue is the damage caused by (in most cases, very minor) leaks and the cost to fix them. That's where untreated timber comes into play... fixing the leak doesn't fix the decayed or at risk timber. The price of "stopping the leaks" is a very small part of the cost. Approx 75% to 90% of the cost of the repairs is purely down to the remediation of the decayed/untreated framing.

    It ain't fair to blame designers, developers, builders or building consent authorities for the costs associated with down grading the durability of timber framing. That blame lays squarely with the likes of CCH and other industry players for manipulating the market into thinking that untreated timber was the way to go (kindly sponsoring their employees to provide their services to the standards association to get it mandated) together with the BIA and standards association (Govt) for allowing (mandating) that it was acceptable to use untreated framing.

    Wankers

    Cladding failures are to be (and should be) expected. If the structural materials met the durability requirements mandated in NZBC B2 New Zealanders wouldn't know what the fuck "Leaky Building Syndrome" was.

    Blame the government for 80% of the cost. That is where the blame lies. It is morally reprehensible that they indemnified the building industry authority (BIA) and BRANZ and then encourage a litigious process that makes victims out of everyone (even a concrete placer that pours a concrete drive where a home owner tells him to put it, gets shafted for $50,000.00) Where is the justice in that??? Fuck them
    Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    18th February 2008 - 17:34
    Bike
    Zooks 85 GS1100G and 84 GSX1100E
    Location
    North Shore, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,082
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWST? View Post
    tell me how you can lower a relocated building onto its new foundations without actually going under it?.
    What's your budget to do the job and what's your budget for the logistics plan?
    Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    A budget for making a plan? Nice. I wish I could charge that.


    >>foundations without actually going under it?<<

    Could you lift the floorboards?

  13. #43
    Join Date
    18th February 2008 - 17:34
    Bike
    Zooks 85 GS1100G and 84 GSX1100E
    Location
    North Shore, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    A budget for making a plan? Nice. I wish I could charge that.


    >>foundations without actually going under it?<<

    Could you lift the floorboards?
    You're onto it. If it's a straight forward flat site with lowish height bearers and subfloor bracing (installed and fixed to piles before siting house over them) a few carefully located holes in the flooring would give the required access to complete the job from above. It is then safe to enter under it (barring being situated adjacent to un-retained excavations surcharged with heavy live loads)

    That'll be $150 + GST thanks
    Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by flyingcrocodile46 View Post

    That'll be $150 + GST thanks

    It's that old yarn about the engineer who charges $100 to hit a boiler with a hammer. It's not the hitting - it's knowing where to hit.

    Cool - that lines up nicely with PR opp. You only owe me 50. :-)

  15. #45
    Join Date
    11th May 2009 - 19:21
    Bike
    kwaka 250, GS450 Rat Bike
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    66
    site forman should have his arse kicked. first major rule on any site, hard hat and hi vizz, did you fill out a report. osh will love to hear about this im sure. sorry to hear about it though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •