Chappy
Come see what the fuss is about....................http://www.californiasuperbikeschool.co.nz/
Chappy
Come see what the fuss is about....................http://www.californiasuperbikeschool.co.nz/
but yes she is running well - its all possible - i knew of a Rs250 aprilia that had 75hp at the rear - that would take me for a run!!
Chappy
Come see what the fuss is about....................http://www.californiasuperbikeschool.co.nz/
All good thinkinh Neil. I tend to agree about letting more models into posties and liberating the rules in regards in regards to 2 strokes generally. The added variety would only make the racing more interesting.
Your lil rocket should do well against the other top F3 bikes but at the end of the day it is still a money game and those who spend more will invaribly go faster. Ive finally conceded to this idea.![]()
If you say that last paragraph too yourself often enough you will work it out,But let me speed up the process for you.The rule reads Primarily NOT exclusively.
The absolute last thing the sport needs is yet another class too pander to a bunch of wannabes who probably never will.If the people with these bikes really wanted too go racing,They would be already on those bikes pointed out by you in your original post.Example being Brian Bernard,Rodney Knapp,Nathan Spargo,Andrew Stroud,Jeff McLaren,Aaron Slight and a whole bunch of other guys managed too do 1.12s or better on standard GSXR 1100S/FZR1000S back in the eighties all on roadrubber and with NO fancy suspenders,Warren Turner managed 1.12s on his FZR600 F2 bike in the same era and so on.So its not that the bikes cant be competitive at club level
Yeah the "primarily wording" is the thing keeps the bikes in this class being developed & the class what it is ...the [U]very last formula class[U] around. It is surprising what you can build and for what price (see Ozzy450 for reference, - a good idea, pretty cheap but very competitve)
The Tiggy is a "special" - but in the essence of the class fits right in and adds a lot of spice.
And BTW - A good 450 - blows my tractor into the weeds (in a straightline) no question!. The SV seemed the best base unit to start with when i got into it & i have slowly added bits to it over each season (still waaaay less than building a 600 or Sbk though). if i were to do it again - i would seriously look at another option.
Hopefully we see a few more triples & trick singles, 450's and twins turning up for nationals and great to hear you will be doing them neil - nationals are the ultimate test in New Zealand and worth striving for success in.
GlenW
oh, (p), dont forget to also get rid of the F3 bikes - they can race with the buckets,
and F1 can race with the World Superbikes,
Clubmans can just race on the road,
and F2..... well, they can run with the new MotoGP2 class.
Right, that's the dwindling Nationals f@cked!
Time to go racing in the bigger Tri-Series!!!Yeeha!!
Or am I missing your point??????
Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??
Your right the MC18 was made in 1989 but the MC21 was released in 1989 as the new model for 1990.
I have done my research and my friend in Japan (Who works for one one of the largest bike shop's) has verified this for me.
I know it's off topic but how many different variations of ZXR and VFR are there??
The NSR got slower as it got newer.........the MC18 had 4 mor HP than the MC21.............4HP..........thats almost as much most of the suzuki's have........![]()
The difference beween 12s and 6s is 6 seconds per lap, 6 seconds per lap is like the difference between the 19th century and the 21st century. Its achieved by much better frames, wider and stickier tyres, much more horsepower and those ''fancy suspenders'' that some love to denigrate. ITS CALLED PROGRESS!!!!
Try running stock suspension on a 160bhp out of the box 1000cc class machine and see how long it takes to burn up the tyres, also evidence the visible pitch control issues.
Each to their own, if people want to run stock suspension let them, if they want to run ''fancy suspenders'' let them. Just dont let the politics of envy intervene.
Scrivvy I think your series demonstrates very clearly that the Nationals is actually not so much about diluting the allowable machine specification. Its more about the costs of travel, accomodation and time away etc.
Your format appears to have hit the nail on the head of how a series should be organised and how to attract numbers. That Suzuki NZ is now majorly backing it is a strong indicator and also is a none too subtle reminder that MNZ has got a lot of mending to do re relationships with the main distributors.
To be fair though mate, Manfield was quite a different track then. There were no joins in the seal to begin with, or pot holes around the braking point for Higgins. Those same guys with head wrapped around current machines with flash suspension, on the track like it was then, I'm pretty sure would be around the minute mark.
I would disagree with you RE the track condition as would most people who were riding back then.However I would agree the rest of your post.You would be right on the mark,But the point I was making was those bikes are still capable in the right hands with a bit of fettling at club level rather than starting a whole new class as was suggested by the thread originator
Visit the team here - teambentley
Thanks to my sponsors : The Station Sports Cafe and Bar | TSS Red Baron | Zany Zeus | Continental | The Office Relocation Company | Fine Signs | Stokes Valley Collision Repair | CBWD Digital Media Inbound Marketing
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks