There is alot of fresh and good ideas floating arround with changes to classes.
Everyone has ideas and thats good for progress of the sport.
Post classic seems to be a target for change but the biggest problem is im not convinced its broken,damaged or needs changed.
Post classic is a play ground for those who like to maintain and race against other bikes of equal tech and performance.
Every race has races within racers and guys battle for every point.
The idea of a newer generation of bike that cant compete with the latest and greatest bikes is great.lets be honest a 1998yzf just isnt in the same league as a 2008r1.
Clubmans bike run around the track with no champ points and no real purpose.
the guys in clubmans that want to show every meeting would surely rather have an overall championship to set their sites on.I may be wrong.
Would it not make sence to split them into pre 2000 and after 2000 and give them champ points.
In my opinion this gives an entry level comp and sets the scene for slightly older f1 f2 f3 bikes to be sold into a hungry market.This brings new guy and gals in and alows for more affordable upgrades at the top end of the sport.
If the new classes become popular enough they will end up running two individual races(eg too many entries).That would be good aswell at some point in the future.
My defination of postclassic is time period racing of older generation bikes(eg carb big bangers and screaming little rippers).If we start adding newer generation machines we risk knocking away the tail of the field who have put time and effort into their higher maintence labour of love race machine.
Bookmarks