Also knives should be limeted to 1 per person per house hold,as they are used more than guns in crime.
Also knives should be limeted to 1 per person per house hold,as they are used more than guns in crime.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Ill put my bike in the van and take it for a drive.Ill have to be carefull as i might still break the 15sec rule.
Maximum allowed speed 4mph. Man with red flag and bell to walk in front...
Petrol to be stored separately from motorbike...
. “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis
I like this idea. And to anyone who objects then you are a death-monger who lives off the fear of the poor parents involved and only want to be free to watch people kill each other and to kill other people.
All motorcyclists need to justify why they need a motorcycle. Given that the only reason to have a motorcycle is transport, then a GN250 is all you will be allowed without a special license. This special license will only allow you to use the bike at the track... You like the idea of riding a bigger bike? Tough, you need to give a reason why you should be able to, going fast is speeding, accelerating quickly is dangerous driving.
Any flash or fast looking bikes are also outlawed because that way we can keep people who want to kill themselves on a motorcycle from going 'hey, that bike looks awesome, I want a motorcycle too'.
That is ok though because all the tracks are being closed down because people moved in next door then realised that it could get a little noisy at times so complained to the council. The flash bikes are being banned because people think they look scary. The price of petrol for bikes is going up because the government is making it harder to import because it is 'dangerous'.
To everyone who reads this: Please bear in mind that when you read these restrictions (and wonder what the hell I have been smoking) that this is the same feeling that most firearms owners in NZ get when people start suggesting these so called 'solutions' to the 'problem' of firearms-related crime. Almost without fail these restrictions seem to be designed to cause the most grief for law abiding firearms license holders while simultaneously costing the tax payer a ridiculous amount to enforce with ZERO measurable benefit in terms of increasing safety.
Most of these restrictions that I have suggested are based off other existing restrictions on firearms license holders or restrictions that people have suggested.
Hunting and shooting is every bit as bred into our blood as motorcycles are. A lot of people grew up in families where they started out hunting rabbits and possums and have moved on to deer, pigs, goats, ducks etc. all of which are pests in a lot of places. A lot of people target shoot as a sport and do so just as safely and competently as a motorcyclist at a track day.
Please remember this next time you see someone spouting off about how law abiding firearms license holders should be required to submit to periodic cavity searches because in other countries 1 person per 40 million is killed each year in a high-school shooting, while simultaneously failing to provide statistics for high-school knifings or high-school poisonings or high-school beatings-to-death etc.
Sorry for the excessive ranting....
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
And anyone caught having fun on a bike should be jailed without trial.
0-100k in 15 secs could the human body cope with such acceleration?
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank...
Give a man a bank he can rob the WORLD !!!
So manyt people have viewed this thread and about 10% have commented.
Forgive my obvious troll but I was just trying to make a point in a manner that you all should understand.
All the comments regarding bikes and safethy I have heard before. Most of them not in jest but raised as a serious means of controlling motorbikes and their riders.
Now just imagine what its like for those of us who choose to partake in the shooting sports.
We are a very lawabiding segment of the community. We are very safety concious and we are very tired of being hit upon when there is an incedent involving a firearm.
Did you know that the history of firerms control in this country was never a bout the firearms themselves. Its always been about control of the people who pocess them. In 1920 they brought in the first major arms legislation because they were afraid that there was going to be some sort of revolution. Think about it. The Russian Revolution, the anarchist uprisings, WW1 where people got used to using firearms on other people..
ARMS CONTROL IS ABOUT PEOPLE CONTROL
Always has been and always will.
How would you like it if you were constantly bombarded by new and improved controls being mooted or legislated for the control of how, when, what and where you are allowed to use a motorcycle.
Dont tell me it is not the same. It is. Remember
People Control.
A controlled populace is a docile populace and thetrefore less likely to react when other rights are slowly eroded.
Can you think of any of this errosioin of your rights?
How about thew smacking bill, how about the abolishment of the Privy Council, how about the police investiugating themselves after a compaint. How about the way your ele cted representatives pretty much ignore you once they have been elected. How about the right to protect yourself or your family (dont tell me tahts what the police are for as they are totally reacti ve to an event). How about the pay you pay for road works with yor taxes then have to pay again with a toll.
Just think about it.
Then make an informed decision, but sorry even though you may do that what good is it when you dont have the right to be heard. You protest you could be done for disturbing the peace or worse.
They, whoever they are have you by the short and curlies. They run your life from birth to death and make you pay all the way.
Chris
"When you think of it,
Lifes a bowl of ....MERDE"
If there were crates of G36's and RPGs dropped on the corner of every street, available to every person in NZ, apart from more violence there would still be no "armed revolt", NZ is too docile. Maybe in ww1 time like you said, but now it could only really be about limiting what is available to criminals IMO. With control on weapons as strict as it is, you aren't going to see any full auto assault rifles in the hands of gangs like in the US, are you. What would people revolt for, anyway?
I'm beginning to think that anyone over the age of 16 caught committing a serious crime on your property could be dealt to by the householder (and that includes firearms). The householder should be exempt from prosecution.
Example: If you catch some turd stealing your bike at night you should be able to shoot him in the backside and not go to jail.
The crims seem to have more rights than the victims. Look at that Clayton Weatherston. He was caught pretty much red handed in his ex's parents place. If he can bullshit his way through trial and the jury is thick he might actually walk free. Under my law Mum or Dad would have shot him and saved us a lot of trouble. They might have even saved her life.
The analogy is pants.
Gun = point, shoot, kill, repeat.
Bike = point, shoot, kill, die.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks