I think the OP said his under 25 is covered for the currently insured VTR250. The OP enquired with State about upgrading to a 400 and State said - the under 25 would not be covered.
I don't think State is reneging on cover for the VTR250 - they are just saying they won't insure the same rider on a bigger bike unless he is over 25.
Insurance companies do need to get smarter however about understanding how valuable and how risky customers are.
jimjim - I am trying to do my best to make my company aware of customer loyalty and understand customer relationships. It's about profiling risk on customers as well as the items they insure. It's hard to change old companies, but I am trying!
PS: I am insured with State for the SV650 and the standard excess jumped quite a bit over the VTR250. This is because Suzukis have a higher theft record than Hondas. The premium however wasn't much more. This illustrates the point... that insurers need to be more targetted. Not ALL suzukis are more thievable than ALL hondas. I would bet my SV650 is less of a theft target than a Repsol replica CBR1000RR or some such.
Bookmarks