Correct answer.Originally Posted by MisterD
Irritant
Correct answer.
Workin' Socially!
My goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog already thinks I am.
.....your time is coming
No is not the correct answer....
Irritant
Yes, it is.
.....your time is coming
Mmmmm......nop...the solution is in our hands "Brothers in Arms"...
Psyclepath
So criminalising me for the way I choose to set boundaries for my boys is the f-ing answer to stopping kids being beaten to death?
An analogy for the hard of thinking...if you want to characterise smacking as "violence" or "abuse" then we may as well talk about "solitary confinement" or "imprisonment" instead of "time-out" or the "naughty mat". It's just plain f-ing stupid.
Only a homo puts an engine back together WITHOUT making it go faster.
Missing my buddy Morepower
Bring back the bash I say!
But I love watching the parenting programe - wish he'd teach me what to do with a lazy, unhelpful and unco-operative teenager!
The instructions are simple...
Ship him/her off to Grahameeboy. Let him suffer the effects of state-sponsored child terrorism firsthand.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
Slowest cnut in the Bay
Do what I told ya on Sunday..........move house.
And dont tell them you're moving, or where you're going.
Yeah ok, I know, in your case not applicable, but sure was funny our end.
.....your time is coming
Not talking about you...the Law allows you to smack for safety reasons...yep that cycle guy who got convicted...that was dumb but like all Laws it's the Judges etc who abuse the Laws.I think the Law is a good idea because it may, and yes it is a "may", make parents think...I am sure that parents who abuse kids start off as "nice".I see some kids being dragged by their arms when they misbehave...kids joints are not fully formed and you could harm them...We expect to live in a cotton wool society where we think we know best etc etc...I bet abuse here is higher than say Indonesia...where drunk drivers face the death penalty and guess what offending is low...unlike NZ and America
Forum whore
You've got some weird ideas about NZ mate.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Psyclepath
The law allows me to smack to prevent harm or somesuch wording, but specifically forbids "smacking for the purposes of correction". This means that if I see my 3 1/2 year old about to hit his 4 month old brother, I can smack him, but if I'm too slow to prevent it I'm not allowed to smack him as punishment!
If I smack #1 son in those circumstances, I'm breaking the law, and I'm dependent on the police or CYFS deciding whether it's "inconsequential" or not. To me, that kind of power vested in state apparatus is completely and utterly unacceptable...the argument from the anti-smacking jihadists that "nobody has been convicted" is irrelevant, plenty have had their lives made a complete nightmare by the CYFS stormtroopers.
Only a homo puts an engine back together WITHOUT making it go faster.
.....your time is coming
Why do you have to smack for correction...would you smack a work colleague for correction? No you would talk to them...surely Kids can be penalised without having to smack?? You know talking to them...
.....your time is coming
Just different maybe...specifics
The instructions are simple...
Try reasoning with a naughty 3yo...
...good luck with that.
Meh...a quick smack on the bum...effective.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks