Pink Floyd and Beatle Types

**Skyryder** · 1st October 2009, 19:18

Anyone know what came first?

This

or

Sergeant Peppers.

Skyryder

**MisterD** · 1st October 2009, 19:23

Beatles by a few months...June versus November '67.

**peasea** · 1st October 2009, 19:36

PF did a better job of the sound tho'. Musta had better drugs for the mixers and the producer.

Pink Floyd lasted longer too.

**Shadows** · 1st October 2009, 21:38

Don't know or care about timeline.

Floyd comes first in my books. The Beatles were ratshit.

**MisterD** · 2nd October 2009, 07:55

Originally Posted by Shadows

Floyd comes first in my books. The Beatles were ratshit.

Feck off, I wouldn't be without the White Album or Dark Side but John Lennon coulda beaten up the whole of PF on his own...

**Stirts** · 2nd October 2009, 08:00

The Beatles and John Lennon suck arse in comparison to Pink Floyd!!!

SO THERE!!!!

**Elysium** · 2nd October 2009, 08:13

Yeah the Beetles sound sucked because they stuck with mono.

**MisterD** · 2nd October 2009, 08:21

Originally Posted by stirts

the beatles and john lennon suck arse in comparison to pink floyd!!!

so there!!!!

do not!!!!

**nudemetalz** · 2nd October 2009, 08:25

David Gilmour has his own (or he did once) P-51 Mustang, so they get my vote !!!

**MisterD** · 2nd October 2009, 08:29

Originally Posted by nudemetalz

David Gilmour has his own (or he did once) P-51 Mustang, so they get my vote !!!

Nick Mason has more cool old Ferraris than you can shake a stick at, but at the end of the day PF are pretentious suvvern pooftas whilst the Beatles are proper Northerners.

**Stirts** · 2nd October 2009, 08:31

Originally Posted by MisterD

do not!!!!

DO SO!!!

And my Dad is bigger than your Dad and he's gonna beat your Dad up!!

**Big Dave** · 2nd October 2009, 09:19

Oh pahlease.

The Beatles had more influence on popular culture than anyone had before them. They set the bar for songwriting too.

I do like Floyd better meeessself.