Not sure of your point there, but it sounds like you don't accept that Stalin had a significant part in ending WW2, at least in Europe. That flies in the face of the reality of the extraordinary achievement of the Soviet forces in defeating the German forces. Sadly, the victory was at huge cost to the Soviet people. Doesn't diminish the enormity of the result though.
And arguably the Americans' hasty application of the atomic bomb on Japan was due in part to Stalin's intent to invade Manchukuo (Manchuria) and thence Kyushu. That atomic bombing in turn shortened the Pacific war by some months.
So you would have difficulty in disallowing a claim that Stalin's efforts to shorten WW2, as selfish as they were, were effective.
Not saying he deserved a peace prize for it or to be nominated for it though, given the vast numbers of his countrymen he condemned to death in achieving that result.
But I may have misconstrued your comment. It could be you already accept Stalin's role in shortening the war and you were questioning just the rationale for his being nominated for a peace prize, perhaps?
Only a biker knows why a dog sticks his head out of a car window.
Stalin helped shorten the war yes, well he had to make up for helping Germany early in the war didn't he?
As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so life well used brings happy death
Γύρος στη νίκη
I have a suspicion that self-preservation played more than a small part in Stalin's efforts. And as history records, Stalin was more into helping himself (to most of the old Soviet bloc countries for instance) than in helping other nations or peoples, so any assistance to Hitler would've been an unintended by-product, unwillingly provided.
But hey, we agree that shorten the war he did. All good. And that he was a murderous megalomaniac, no better than Hitler.
However, the Nobel Peace Prize has always been a crock, so by that that standard, BHO's 'win' has just as much credibility as any of the previous awards. Zip.
![]()
Only a biker knows why a dog sticks his head out of a car window.
The greatest pleasure of my recent life has been speed on the road. . . . I lose detail at even moderate speed but gain comprehension. . . . I could write for hours on the lustfulness of moving swiftly.
--T.E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
Given the extent of obama's policy of winning hearts and minds of enemies (at expense of the friends and allies), I'd say the only person more deserving NPP than BHO, I know of, is Mr. Arthur Neville Chamberlain
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
No he prefered Oral. opps farked that up was supposed to quote sumun
"People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks