On our side of the world it is Ohlin's that is the main shock here, with the best support anywhere in the world!
What has inspired you to start posting on a New Zealand bike web site?
On our side of the world it is Ohlin's that is the main shock here, with the best support anywhere in the world!
What has inspired you to start posting on a New Zealand bike web site?
I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN
A post with a lot of info came up in a google search.
It seems like people over here are more interested in talking about stuff that matters regarding suspension work.
If you were to ask this same question on a US forum it would go like this - first people would tell you that they know nothing about suspension so you should just send the forks out to either X, Y, or Z. Then the rest of it turns into a 35 page argument about how X & Z suck and that Y is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN
I see Ohlins uses the older check plate configuration on their now 30mm R1 pistons.
Wouldn't you still want a mid valve stack to control initial dive?
Hmm so no Ohlins independant person in the whole of the USA ??
I wonder how RT would sound with an american accent?
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
So maybe I have things wrong.
The way I understand it is that the compression stack requires x amount of pressure for the shims to start to bend.
The mid valve would require much less than x amount of pressure for its shims to start to bend. This provides damping at low shaft speeds to prevent any harsh feel and provide control.
I am not trying to argue, just understand. When you look at the individual stack/valve/parts combination they look like a traditional arrangement pre-mid valve. If the mid valve assembly works great in a traditional fork what is the dynamic that changes when things are set up separately?
I thought about it some and think I understand now.
Since you have removed the rebound circuit from that fork leg the pressure builds up faster as there is no low speed rebound circuit for it to bleed off through which allows the compression stack to react faster therefore eliminating the need for the mid valve.
Taking it one step further, the elimination of the other circuits (ie - mid valve and low speed rebound) is why they say the BPF tend to ride higher in the stroke.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks