gn250 Hell NO/CBD anger.

**Hahn** · 22nd November 2009, 19:47

Don't stop posting though, this is way more entertaining than NCIS!

**Tank** · 22nd November 2009, 19:50

Originally Posted by Dean

When I said "why wont this thread die" its due to the crooked mods who I pmed to put this thread in PD want proof? Ask hitcher and Mental Trousers, they wont delete it because they want to have a good laugh.

Dude - as someone that has more infractions than you have had post - Even I can say that the Mods arnt cooked.

But - yeah - your post are pretty funny - and for that we thank you.

Edit - that reminds me of your post as youngbiker16 how you were convinced that China was going to invade the US by boat. Pure comedy gold.

**Ragingrob** · 22nd November 2009, 19:53

Originally Posted by Dean

Are you kidding me I showed you guys pics of my own bike corroding, threads related to Gn's problems, facts on the Gn250 like its currently being made in China with a cheap chrome finish. The old gn's still had the regulater rectifier problem and rear tyres were still shinko and you guys tell me I showed nothing?

Yes the modern GNs are prone to corroding rather quickly. If ya watch it and look after it you're able to prevent that from happening.

Many, many bikes including Cbr250s have major reg/rec problems.

A tyre had nothing to do with the bike itself whatsoever, it's called getting better tyres when ya wear those out. Btw they're only really shit in the wet.

Hey looky, some threads regarding problems people have had with Zeals, even some regarding yours:

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...highlight=zeal

Geee whizz it must be shit bike huh!

Logic fail.

So... Are you gonna tell us why GNs are shit for a learner?

From the points you've just made (which I assume are your strongest points) the learner may:

Keep the chrome finish as dry as possible and protected even through a quick wipe with WD40.

Get a cheap reg/rec IF the stock fucks out, but to be honest I haven't even heard of GN regs busting, nothing compared to CBRs... Are CBRs shit bikes?

And buy some decent tyres when the Shinkos are done.

Does it make it a mint learner bike now?

**sunhuntin** · 22nd November 2009, 19:54

Originally Posted by Ragingrob

Well that was a fucked up reply...

1) So your making generalisations based on what? I would say that under 5% of car drivers who don't ride would be able to pick out 250s without seeing stickers. ?

ive had other riders with years and years of experience assume my bike is a 600+. i would imagine most car drivers would assume the same. the only thing that brands it as a 250 is the rego card.

on the flip side, i recall the 500 being mistaken as a smaller cc bike at least once. after i sold it to my old boss, we would often end up with both viragos at work, and a few riders thought that mine was the bigger cc. i know i cant just look at a bike and pick the cc rating without a closer look.

**Dean** · 22nd November 2009, 19:57

Originally Posted by Tank

Dude - as someone that has more infractions than you have had post - Even I can say that the Mods arnt cooked.

But - yeah - your post are pretty funny - and for that we thank you.

Edit - that reminds me of your post as youngbiker16 how you were convinced that China was going to invade the US by boat. Pure comedy gold.

Why wont the mods put this thread in PD then if they arent crooked? They just want their kicks for the night.

And no It was on the prediction of North Korea along with allies attacking America by Nuclear weapons. I made that prediction last year and what do you know? This year Obama cuts of money and production to the missle defense system which protects their country from a Nuclear attack.

**James Deuce** · 22nd November 2009, 19:59

Just so we get this straight, no country could defend themselves from a nuclear attack. Even one carried out by a 17 year old on a GN250.

**huff3r** · 22nd November 2009, 20:02

Originally Posted by James Deuce

Just so we get this straight, no country could defend themselves from a nuclear attack. Even one carried out by a 17 year old on a GN250.

Hmmm... not entirely, the USA has a very sophisticated missile defence network, and are developing an even more sophisticated laser-assisted satellite system too... so yeah, they can stop a few ICBMs carrying nuke warheads. But thats another story... However, if delivered via a GN250 theyd never suspect a thing

**GOONR** · 22nd November 2009, 20:04

Originally Posted by James Deuce

Just so we get this straight, no country could defend themselves from a nuclear attack. Even one carried out by a 17 year old on a GN250.

I'm not allowed to give you any rep right now.

**Mully** · 22nd November 2009, 20:05

Dean, FFS just STOP!!

Please just stop.

Crooked Mods now. Holy sweet baby Jesus tittyfucking Christ on a cracker.

Please stop.

**Hahn** · 22nd November 2009, 20:06

Originally Posted by James Deuce

Just so we get this straight, no country could defend themselves from a nuclear attack. Even one carried out by a 17 year old on a GN250.

That would be perfect, no-one would believe him

or take him seriously

**Mully** · 22nd November 2009, 20:08

Originally Posted by Dean

And no It was on the prediction of North Korea along with allies attacking America by Nuclear weapons. I made that prediction last year and what do you know? This year Obama cuts of money and production to the missle defense system which protects their country from a Nuclear attack.

This, BTW, was the thread in which you claimed to also have predicted the September 11 attacks when you were 8.

Please stop. It's embarrasing.

**James Deuce** · 22nd November 2009, 20:09

Originally Posted by huff3r

Hmmm... not entirely, the USA has a very sophisticated missile defence network, and are developing an even more sophisticated laser-assisted satellite system too... so yeah, they can stop a few ICBMs carrying nuke warheads. But thats another story... However, if delivered via a GN250 theyd never suspect a thing

"Developing", never tested, and I rather suspect more PR than actual functioning hardware.

Insisting on spending trillions on weapons defense systems where missing even one incoming means 10s of thousands of deaths, whilst the funds diverted into programmes where toilets seats cost 1 million dollars and, lets see, 10s of thousands of people die needlessly because of poverty and untreated medical issues is a deliciously perverse irony.

The problem with military solutions to military problems is they tend to be a bit one dimensional.

I'd pick my answer over yours simply because it's almost a historical certainty that "sophisticated" US weapons systems of the last 70 years seldom fit the arena in which they are deployed, and even if they are deployed correctly, someone sold the propellant as fertiliser.