Page 14 of 28 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 420

Thread: Hampton Downs: is there an issue?

  1. #196
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles08 View Post
    I think he was referring to front suspension set up Suzuki21
    Both ends in fact.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  2. #197
    Join Date
    4th April 2007 - 15:04
    Bike
    Kawasaki ZX6R
    Location
    Massey, Auckland
    Posts
    1,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Both ends in fact.
    indeed...

    I have had experience with pretty bad tank slappers recently and it can be pretty un-nerving in the midst of it for sure...a little wobble can be expected but if settings are way off and rider input is incorrect at the time then this can be the end result.

    I still believe the hump is a definite contributing factor in the recent fatality and needs to be looked at with very scrutinizing eyes going forward. Hampton Downs Ride days are a very professional organization and I feel they need to be absolved from any responsibility in this incident. The fact remains, a rider was killed at Hampton Downs and if nothing changes in hindsight for the better then what have we learned and whats stopping it happening again. The track management need to make a decision and move towards making the track safer for participants. There are many options on how to achieve this and $$$ should not feature in this discussion at all.

  3. #198
    Join Date
    12th January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    '87 CR500, '10 RM144
    Location
    'Kura, Auckland, Kiwiland
    Posts
    3,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles08
    There are many options on how to achieve this and $$$ should not feature in this discussion at all.
    Yes, that should be the case, but it won't. Puke is a perfect example of a track that could be made safe without huge expenditure, but never has or will.
    I'll be surprised if we see any changes at hampton.
    Drew for Prime Minister!

    www.oldskoolperformance.com

    www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )

  4. #199
    Join Date
    12th January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    '87 CR500, '10 RM144
    Location
    'Kura, Auckland, Kiwiland
    Posts
    3,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Both ends in fact.
    Isn't it the bit in on the top that is the issue?
    Drew for Prime Minister!

    www.oldskoolperformance.com

    www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )

  5. #200
    Join Date
    13th February 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    Forza 155 SE Pit Bike
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    11,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles08 View Post
    indeed...

    I have had experience with pretty bad tank slappers recently and it can be pretty un-nerving in the midst of it for sure...a little wobble can be expected but if settings are way off and rider input is incorrect at the time then this can be the end result.

    .
    Hate to interupt, but from what I'm told you experienced high speed weaves or wobbles, not "tank slappers". A tru "tank slapper" is bars lock to lock and commonly results in broken thumbs. I have the thumb dents in my rgv tank photographed as evidence o said "tank slapper".
    Vote David Bain for MNZ president

  6. #201
    Join Date
    21st April 2007 - 08:04
    Bike
    None
    Location
    Mt Maunganui
    Posts
    2,350
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles08 View Post
    indeed...

    I have had experience with pretty bad tank slappers recently and it can be pretty un-nerving in the midst of it for sure...a little wobble can be expected but if settings are way off and rider input is incorrect at the time then this can be the end result.

    I still believe the hump is a definite contributing factor in the recent fatality and needs to be looked at with very scrutinizing eyes going forward. Hampton Downs Ride days are a very professional organization and I feel they need to be absolved from any responsibility in this incident. The fact remains, a rider was killed at Hampton Downs and if nothing changes in hindsight for the better then what have we learned and whats stopping it happening again. The track management need to make a decision and move towards making the track safer for participants. There are many options on how to achieve this and $$$ should not feature in this discussion at all.
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly it was the concrete wall!!The only sensible resolution would be too remove the offending wall(not gonna happen) or haybale/air fence the offending section of wall.The removal of the hump will only see the lesser experienced riders that are currently backing off for it arriving at the kink carrying even more speed,The scenarios for crashing headfirst into that wall are endless.
    The only question in my mind is,Who is responsible for the safety,The track owners/Managers that supply the facility for the general public to hire and use at their discretion,Or the organisation running the event??I know from my experience as Clerk of the couse and MNZ steward it was our responsibility to inspect the track and ensure evrything was up to scratch and inform the riders of anything that may reduce safety.

    Does this happen at trackdays organised outside the MNZ umbrella???

  7. #202
    Join Date
    29th January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki GSX-R750 K6
    Location
    Te Puke
    Posts
    2,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly it was the concrete wall!!
    That is the crux of it, Billy! Nothing more, nothing less
    Member, sem fiddy appreciation society


    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I find it ironic that the incredibly rude personal comments about Les were made by someone bearing an astonishing resemblance to a Monica Lewinsky dress accessory.

    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    All was good until I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable after a while

  8. #203
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly it was the concrete wall!!...
    Quote Originally Posted by Pussy View Post
    That is the crux of it, Billy! Nothing more, nothing less
    Exactly. This precisely what I was saying a page or 3 back. Having a solid concrete wall in a (more than) potential high speed whoops area, instead of a restraint or run off system, is not responsible.
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  9. #204
    Join Date
    8th July 2005 - 02:55
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    790
    many people think there is serious safety issue here. If it happens once it can happen again. If the circuit owners are not going to step up and address this matter they can be compelled to do so by the coroner who has a duty to investigate and prevent future deaths by this cause. I think the only way it can be properly addressed is via the Coroners inquest in to this incident. We all have a right to be heard by the coroner. Write to him.

    Coroners: Gordon Matenga, Peter Ryan

    Tel: (07) 834 1756
    Fax: (07) 834 1757

    219 Collingwood Street
    Hamilton

    P O Box 9383
    Waikato Mail Service Centre
    Hamilton 3240

  10. #205
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    BSA A10
    Location
    Rangiora
    Posts
    12,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly
    No, but as (possibly) contributing factors they still need looking at
    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough power."


    Quote Originally Posted by scracha View Post
    Even BP would shy away from cleaning up a sidecar oil spill.
    Quote Originally Posted by Warren Zevon
    Send Lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan

  11. #206
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly it was the concrete wall.
    Hey guys has it actually been established what killed the poor bloke?
    Not being a smartass here but to me yes the concrete wall is an issue but most of the time you are going alongside the wall so impact is glancing.
    BUT those big ol sticking out fence brackets are face on to you and you would go from 100 km/h plus to zero pretty fast if you hit em.
    I recall the damage a simple sticking out 12mm bolt did to one guy on the hill at pukie--he was sliding dwn the armco "nicely" (well crashing into anything aint nice) till his leg hit that bolt.
    I'm happy to be proven wrong but I feel an instant improvement would be simply to relocate the catchfence brackets to the pitside of the wall
    AGAIN --I'm happy to be proven wrong but to me slide is good -sudden stop not good
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  12. #207
    Join Date
    4th April 2007 - 15:04
    Bike
    Kawasaki ZX6R
    Location
    Massey, Auckland
    Posts
    1,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Seems obvious to me and others,The hump or machine set up were not what killed Tim,Clearly it was the concrete wall!!The only sensible resolution would be too remove the offending wall(not gonna happen) or haybale/air fence the offending section of wall.The removal of the hump will only see the lesser experienced riders that are currently backing off for it arriving at the kink carrying even more speed,The scenarios for crashing headfirst into that wall are endless.
    I don't disagree with you Billy apart from your point about ignoring every other contributing factor. You can not argue with sanity that the hump potentially set up the unfortunate series of events that lead to the Concrete wall. If you think that should be ignored then you are not stepping back and looking at the entire picture.

    You say by removing the 'hump' you will encourage the lesser experienced to go even faster in that section. Is this a bad thing? If by removing the hump you reduce the risk of losing control of your vehicle (bikes are not the only ones that suffer from this feature) at high speed then surely this is a good step in the right direction. After all, the whole point of a race track is to go fast regardless if you are in a race or participating in a track day. Speed is not the issue here, it is the hump AND the concrete wall. As you say, they are less likely to move the wall so lets start with reducing the contributing factors like the hump.

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    The only question in my mind is,Who is responsible for the safety,The track owners/Managers that supply the facility for the general public to hire and use at their discretion,Or the organisation running the event??I know from my experience as Clerk of the couse and MNZ steward it was our responsibility to inspect the track and ensure evrything was up to scratch and inform the riders of anything that may reduce safety.
    Well I'm pretty sure if they were not doing so before, the track day company will be notifying riders of this feature of the track and explaining what/how to cope with it correctly. Its like the way companies have to work with Health and safety now days, Ideally remove the hazard, if this is not possible, isolate the hazard. If this is also unable to be done then and only then the last response is to notify people of the hazard so they can take correct action to ensure they take the necessary action to ensure their own safety.

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Does this happen at trackdays organised outside the MNZ umbrella???
    Seems it doesn't matter Billy, MNZ banned a rider earlier this year for his alleged misdemeanors at a Hampton Downs Ride day (no official investigation was done either, it was a phone call to the rider telling him he was banned for 6 months)... Does this mean they should be involved in this case to investigate?

  13. #208
    Join Date
    4th April 2007 - 15:04
    Bike
    Kawasaki ZX6R
    Location
    Massey, Auckland
    Posts
    1,918
    Quote Originally Posted by White trash View Post
    Hate to interupt, but from what I'm told you experienced high speed weaves or wobbles, not "tank slappers". A tru "tank slapper" is bars lock to lock and commonly results in broken thumbs. I have the thumb dents in my rgv tank photographed as evidence o said "tank slapper".
    So your information was from someone else on my bike at the time Jimmy? I was there, I know what happened on two occasions and believe me the handle bars were 'slapping' the tank. It was seen pretty clearly from the pit wall on one occassion and that was why I was told to pack it up for the day when the rain came (and also cause I don't like getting wet)

    It wasn't a nice feeling.

  14. #209
    Join Date
    28th April 2004 - 11:42
    Bike
    tedium
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    3,526
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    BUT those big ol sticking out fence brackets are face on to you and you would go from 100 km/h plus to zero pretty fast if you hit em.
    Post 49

  15. #210
    Join Date
    15th March 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    Austrian and Italian
    Location
    Glenfield, Auckland
    Posts
    4,687
    I'm surprised the moderators haven't stepped in here. There is an awful lot of speculation going on, along with assumptions and conclusions drawn without the facts. Any other part of KB you'd be shot down.

    Let the coroner do his job, he has all the information but you are well within your right to contact him should you have facts regarding the incident that may assist with his investigation.

    Mort has posted the details above.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •