Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 98 of 98

Thread: Ohlins 30mm Cartridge Kit

  1. #91
    Join Date
    6th March 2006 - 15:57
    Bike
    Rolls Royce RB211
    Location
    Martinborough
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Pussy View Post
    I see K-Tech in the UK have put out a kit for the GSX-R1000 K9 onwards...
    Converts the BPF to one side comp, one side rebound.
    Looks like this is the new trend
    It's funny how this is splitting of the functions between left and right legs is seen as a radical advancement when all it comes down to is KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid. Why have the complexity and associated cost of manufacturing cartridges that incorporate both functions when a simple effective solution is to split the functions and manufacture 2 different simplified components. Sounds like good engineering and business practice.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by slowpoke View Post
    It's funny how this is splitting of the functions between left and right legs is seen as a radical advancement when all it comes down to is KISS: Keep It Simple Stupid. Why have the complexity and associated cost of manufacturing cartridges that incorporate both functions when a simple effective solution is to split the functions and manufacture 2 different simplified components. Sounds like good engineering and business practice.
    Seperate duties for each leg has been around for a while in a number of forks, its nothing new. But it is now embraced more and more in the racing world. For poor buggers like me its great, total time to revalve ( for example ) a compression fork 15 minutes, and it doesnt have to come out of the bike.
    We spend our time doing this work, less time talking.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  3. #93
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    A 30mm piston for any given movement displaces about 44% more fluid than in a 25mm system.
    Where these fork cartidges are not a threw rod design, how is it displacing 44% more fluid with the same size damping rod?

  4. #94
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Doodle Dandy View Post
    Where these fork cartidges are not a threw rod design, how is it displacing 44% more fluid with the same size damping rod?
    Ill rephrase that sorry, what the bigger piston size is pushing......

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  5. #95
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Since JD mentioned them -

    K-Tech has a new major US distributor and some US teams have partnered with them. It will be interesting to see how things go as the distributor has traditionally has been a drag racing type of business but is branching out to all disciplines of racing.

    While I could be wrong, I do not expect any type of real trackside support for K-Tech in the US at this time.

    I did find their cartridge offerings to be interesting though:

    Sealed cartridge
    31mm control pistons
    20mm displacement pistons
    8mm damping rod

    8mm damping rod is smaller than anything else out there to my knowledge.

    With the specs listed I am wondering if the cartridge is similiar to a twin chamber cartridge with the smaller cartridge mated to a larger section where the "control valve" is located.

    While not as edu-ma-cated as others, I am wondering if they used a 20mm cartridge for quicker response with the larger valve.

    Kind of funky looking -



    I see the top of the cartridge has an o-ring on it which makes me think that the cartridge seals itself against the inside of the fork wall and the they must use a seal at the damping rod like an Ohlins gas charged fork/dirt bike forks.

    From the Daytona pics I saw this morning the two small red parts replace the compression adjusters as plugs as they fit flush.



    The spring preload adjusters are two different colors so I am thinking one fork handles compression with the other configured for rebound.


  6. #96
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R100GSPD
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,044
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Seperate duties for each leg has been around for a while in a number of forks, its nothing new. But it is now embraced more and more in the racing world. For poor buggers like me its great, total time to revalve ( for example ) a compression fork 15 minutes, and it doesnt have to come out of the bike.
    We spend our time doing this work, less time talking.
    the forks on my ol 1989 r100gs (marzocchis) have rebound in one leg and comp in the other

  7. #97
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Bikasaurus Rex,Tricerabike
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,980
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony.OK View Post
    This jar theory.................by fitting bigger cartridges, that doesn't mean the air volume is suddenly bigger does it, less oil maybe but the missing oil is taken up by more hard parts.................so instead of half emptying the jar, we are putting a solid in to lessen the fluid volume, now shake it and there won't be much difference.

    Surely a one way valve with larger return ports would cause alot less cavitation than a two way system, and also cause less frictional heat build up as a by product, thus remaining more stable temp wise.

    Do seperate damping cartidges compensate for not being pressurized because of the much lessened oil disturbance from smaller 2 way valving forces.....................?
    True cavitation in suspension dampers is not mixing the gas above the damping fluid with the damping fluid.Cavitation voids are mechanically created vacuum cavities and/or cavities containing vapour of the fluid under the mechanical stress.This happens because the fluid was mechanically depressurised below it's vapour pressure.And this is why gas pressurisation reduces cavitation

  8. #98
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by Pixie View Post
    True cavitation in suspension dampers is not mixing the gas above the damping fluid with the damping fluid.Cavitation voids are mechanically created vacuum cavities and/or cavities containing vapour of the fluid under the mechanical stress.This happens because the fluid was mechanically depressurised below it's vapour pressure.And this is why gas pressurisation reduces cavitation
    Well said, many fork designs are right on the ragged edge of cavitation and Ive seen a few setting changes carried out that have tipped them over that edge. Very aggressive settings can end up being softer as cavitation is huge.
    Gas pressurisation does indeed minimise cavitation, but the amount of pressurisation required is also indicative of how well pressure balanced the unit is. When we are talking shocks its not uncommon to see a pressure of 20 bar in a single tube emulsion shock that lacks an internal base valve and has a very stiff rebound stack to control firm spring rate selection. At the other end of the scale Ohlins TTX36 run at only 6 bar. Ohlins TTX gas motocross fork cartridges run at 5 bar.
    The higher the gas pressure you have to run the greater the seal friction can be, something that is often not accorded too much importance.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •