
Originally Posted by
peasea
You're not wrong mate. I've seen cops lie in the box and seen bullshit written statements fererring to incidents I saw unravel and you try and tell that to a judge. Yeah, sure there are some good cops etc etc but when the shit hits the fan they circle the wagons and use OUR money to fight any and all allegations. The last time I checked I think it was about 3% of complaints against police were upheld. You can't tell me that the other 97% were all bullshit; some of them sure, but not 97%. What it boils down to is how much time and money a member of the public is willing to spend bringing a liar in blue to account.
And what oh great one do you class as being upheld?
Is that the 3% in which the Police get fired? Is it the 3% in which the Police are found at fault? What about the complaints that are not a PCA but are a letter or dissatisfaction or similar. These could be dealt with by a performance plan or specific training for the officer concerned. After all this happens in jobs in the real world. Why would Police be different?
Does this not happen? If it doesn't how do you know. Or will it be a generic statement like "Because they all just fuck'n look after each other".
I don't have hair on my balls,
Hair doesn't grow on steel
Bookmarks