Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Clutchless shifting - bad for your bike?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    25th September 2009 - 18:05
    Bike
    A bleck one.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by Wheeliemonsta View Post
    Modern motorcycles have a sequential gearbox meaning there are no synchro or baulk rings incorperated in there design:
    That's not what sequential means. Sequential means the order of the gears never changes i.e. you can't go to 3rd from 1st without pasing through 2nd. What is of interest in the context of clutchless shifting is the fact they're constant mesh gearboxes with drive dogs.

    While excessinve and prolonged preloading will indeed prematurely wear shift forks, this wear will not be excessively accelerated if you just lightly preload the lever to take up the freeplay on the drum mechanism prior to backing off the throttle to effect the change.
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine. My signature is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless.

    The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    7th February 2007 - 17:33
    Bike
    KTM 525 exc /Husaberg FE 450 E/ CB 125 T
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    74
    Blog Entries
    2
    i gather if your wining and your race team has no probs with gearbox rebuilds.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    20th October 2005 - 17:09
    Bike
    Its a Boat
    Location
    ----->
    Posts
    14,901
    Quote Originally Posted by p.dath View Post
    There is about a million threads on this, covering every spectrum of response.
    No theres not, thereis four, I have checked properly by using the seach function, hence the the dredge...
    Anyway....I clutchless downshift from top to at least 3rd.....never clutchless upshift, didn't realize you could to be honest?
    I don't preload the shifter either, its a matter of fact movement...coupled with rolling off the throttle until gear is engagaed....happens all very quickly.
    So what is the general consenus on this subject?..


    My Bike My Rules!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    What are the other 3 then? I recall some good info (fuck knows what it was now though) in one I've posted in...
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  5. #20
    Join Date
    20th October 2005 - 17:09
    Bike
    Its a Boat
    Location
    ----->
    Posts
    14,901
    Quote Originally Posted by bogan View Post
    What are the other 3 then? I recall some good info (fuck knows what it was now though) in one I've posted in...
    here....this is what search function brings up http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/se...archid=7243618

  6. #21
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Maha View Post
    here....this is what seach function brings up http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/se...archid=7243618
    Hmmm, search links don't appear to transfer over, all the ones I could find were old and didn't deal so much with downshifts anyway, just start a new thread!
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  7. #22
    Join Date
    10th May 2009 - 15:22
    Bike
    2010 Honda CB1000R Predator
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,490
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by Maha View Post
    No theres not, thereis four, I have checked properly by using the seach function, hence the the dredge...
    Anyway....I clutchless downshift from top to at least 3rd.....never clutchless upshift, didn't realize you could to be honest?
    I don't preload the shifter either, its a matter of fact movement...coupled with rolling off the throttle until gear is engagaed....happens all very quickly.
    So what is the general consenus on this subject?..
    Beyond my mechanical capabilities, but the way it has been explained to me is that when shifting down you create a load on the dog gears, and the harder the shift down the greater the load. So I try to be nice shifting down and use the clutch and a blip (the closer the speed of the two on the down shift the less load). Less load should mean less wear on the dog gears.

    The other way, shifting up, is not such of a drama, as the relative speed of the two is the same. So no clutch needed. Just, as you say, a momentary reduction in RPM to allow the dog gear to slip in.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    10th May 2009 - 15:22
    Bike
    2010 Honda CB1000R Predator
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,490
    Blog Entries
    19
    Funnily enough, I just found one of my old threads on a very related subject:
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...why-I-am-wrong

  9. #24
    Join Date
    17th August 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    22"Z900rsSE, Z1R, FZR1000, KTM 2 smoker
    Location
    East Auckland
    Posts
    4,470
    I ran karts for many years with Kawasaki, Cadgiva and YZ engines with no clutch basket in whatsoever. The first thing we did to increase power was remove the clutch basket (except for the gear on the back). We used a dog gear disengage for road racing. Never blew a gearbox and Karts make thousands of shifts.

    Pre Loading the lever will cause excessive wear and un-necessary.

    On the road bike there's not much need but somtimes I do.
    On the MX bike I do it 80% of the time both ways up and down.

    The trick to clutchless shifting to be "off throttle", even if its only for an instant when you shift. Ie no load on the gears! This is essentual, Its about timing. Its not hard do it right and you wont stuff your box.

    Just my 2c ????
    On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!

    'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '

  10. #25
    Join Date
    25th April 2009 - 17:38
    Bike
    RC36, RC31, KR-E, CR125
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    7,364
    Quote Originally Posted by p.dath View Post
    The other way, shifting up, is not such of a drama, as the relative speed of the two is the same. So no clutch needed. Just, as you say, a momentary reduction in RPM to allow the dog gear to slip in.
    The relative speeds are fixed either way though, as are the gear ratios...

    In both cases its just matching the engine speed to wheel speed; the bigger the rpm difference, the higher the engine inertia, the greater the engine torque output, and the quicker the shift, all leads to higher forces on the gearbox components. How you shift determines what parts of components see the bulk of this force.

    With downshift the engine characteristics is more of a factor than for upshifts. Upshifting you'll get less torque, which is fairly proportional to the gear ratio increase, but downshifting you get a lot more engine braking torque both due to the gear ratio change, and the much higher engine braking torque for higher revs. Another concern for me is the chain, I have to run a lot of slack and a roller, bashing it down is going to bounce that chain around and wear the roller out a lot quicker. Obviously correct throttle control could get engine braking really linear through the change, but its a lot trickier than for upshifts.
    "A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal

  11. #26
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Dougcati, Geoff and Suzi
    Location
    Banjo town
    Posts
    10,162
    Bogan, does your bros lock up a shit load off the gas in the wet? Mine would in anything under 4th and 3rd in the dry would get snaky unless you feather the clutch.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Ha...Thats true but life is full horrible choices sometimes Merv. Then sometimes just plain stuff happens... and then some more stuff happens.....




    Alloy, stainless and Ti polishing.
    Bling your bike out!
    PM me

  12. #27
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 17:30
    Bike
    GSXR1000
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,291
    Clutchless up and down here, 75% of the time. Gearbox has in my time done 40,000km and doesn't miss a beat (or a gear).

  13. #28
    Join Date
    13th April 2007 - 18:26
    Bike
    06 scrambler,xrl,
    Location
    In town. Crap
    Posts
    4,155
    Blog Entries
    1
    Pointless on the road.
    Helpful in racing.

    A real challenge is shifting a crash box A7 through town when your loaded to the back teeth with double brown, and no lights, and license, and wof, and no clue............

  14. #29
    Join Date
    1st May 2011 - 12:35
    Bike
    XT660R / TTR250 / 2 old Montesa's
    Location
    Blenheim.. now ChCh
    Posts
    1,803
    I have clutchless shifted all my dirt bikes maybe 50% of the time for over 30 years..
    Never had a dead gear box yet..
    Have noticed Honda's like it more than the others... 2 strokes seem to un-load
    the gear train quicker than 4 strokes when closeing the throttle...
    When I was road raceing we use to hold the throttle full open.. clutch & shift..
    Throttle never left the stop when up shifting... I did have quite a collection of
    worn kawasaki & yamaha clutch plates..
    Pete

    90% of all Harleys built are still on the road... The other 10% made it back home...
    Ducati... Makeing riders into mechaincs since 1964...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •