Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Wait 30 seconds between posts. Wtf?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    2nd December 2007 - 20:00
    Bike
    Baby Gixxer
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,503
    Blog Entries
    7

    Wait 30 seconds between posts. Wtf?

    I have, only of recent days, been experiencing an occurrence whereby I click on "submit post" only to have an error message come up saying "you must wait 30 seconds between posts" then my post shows up twice in the thread. This then requires me to delete the second one.
    Anyone else have this?
    I lahk to moove eet moove eet...

    Katman to steveb64
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I'd hate to ever have to admit that my arse had been owned by a Princess.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    19th April 2009 - 18:52
    Bike
    SF
    Location
    Hamiltron
    Posts
    1,847
    I think it's a feature that Spank may be able to turn off. In another forum I'm on, you have to wait 30 seconds between searches... it sux

  3. #3
    Join Date
    10th May 2009 - 15:22
    Bike
    2010 Honda CB1000R Predator
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,490
    Blog Entries
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_t View Post
    I think it's a feature that Spank may be able to turn off. In another forum I'm on, you have to wait 30 seconds between searches... it sux
    It happens when the site is really busy. Note than when it happens (and you have only done one post) you don't need to do anything. Even though you have been given a warning, the post is still made. If you wait 30s and click the "Post" button again you get a double post.

    I think what is happening under the hood is if the browser does not get a response for 30s it re-transmits the request. So the site ends up getting two post requests, even though you only made one.

    I suspect this will be a short lived issue and will self resolve. it was especially evident when the indexing was occurring.

    EDIT: I think it corresponds with spikes in the I/O wait for the kernel (shown in purple on this graph):
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/monitorix...kern1z.day.png

    EDIT EDIT: I still think that 200 interrupts/second for the network card is high. That means the CPU is being interrupted every 5ms just to service the network card. That's a lot of wasted context switches (and hence CPU power). Should be using something DMA driven.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th October 2008 - 09:32
    Bike
    2006 BMW f650GS
    Location
    dunedin
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by p.dath View Post
    EDIT: I think it corresponds with spikes in the I/O wait for the kernel (shown in purple on this graph):
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/monitorix...kern1z.day.png

    EDIT EDIT: I still think that 200 interrupts/second for the network card is high. That means the CPU is being interrupted every 5ms just to service the network card. That's a lot of wasted context switches (and hence CPU power). Should be using something DMA driven.
    Wot he said.
    Graphs and 3 letter acronyms do it for me every time.
    They called it paradise, I don't know why.
    Call someplace paradise, kiss it goodbye.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •