
Originally Posted by
Jim2
O really?
They're not scare tactics. The reality is that if you want to achieve a non-polluting society, that is what it will take.
I really don't give two figs, so long as I can feed my family and improve my lifestyle. Isn't that what I was sold when I was growing up? If the Greens were even faintly commited to achieving the goals they lay out, their first goal would be to remove all forms of personal transportation. That includes motorcycles, and push bikes The process of creating and running individually owned vehicles is incredibly wasteful. It is certainly what I would target as the easiest way of reducing resource usage. But I fear I've said some things that people don't want to hear. Bugger. No one will vote for me.
You are utterly wrong in your assumption that there are a "million" ways to change things. The type of change required to avoid the future you describe requires wholesale change to individual freedoms in regard to transport, living space, work environment, the type of work people do, clothing, and entertainment. The reality is that just about everything you do requires some input from the "evil" petrochemical industries that you despise. And I'll bet you willingly pay for it. You've definitely got SEP syndrome. If you are not willing to take a stand, and only wear homespun clothing, walk everywhere, only make music with instruments you carved from drift wood, and only eat food you grow yourself, then you are the same as me. You don't care.
I don't think you're quite feeling me here. I don't want to make wholesale changes to our lifestyle, though I realise the costs of everything we do and consume. I just want to reduce the amount of outright waste and greed, so that future generations may enjoy all that we do.
I never described a 'no more bicycles' situation, you did! life is about comprimises, I'm sure even the greens would recognise the lesser of two evils.
Eat the riches! Eat your money! The revolution will be DELICIOUS!!!
Bookmarks