Nothing wrong with personal responsibility.....
nothing at all,
Just that some of us are large enough to be able and willing to look after some off our fellow bikers/roadusers/human beings as well.........
Nothing wrong with personal responsibility.....
nothing at all,
Just that some of us are large enough to be able and willing to look after some off our fellow bikers/roadusers/human beings as well.........
Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....
ahem....steady on Mr Judgemental. I always flash my lights to on coming cars if there's a cop lurking ahead. If by chance I happen to speed (quite likely) and I get pinged then it's my own bloody fault and I'll not be jumping up and down because no-body warned me. It's the risk I take.
Well this thread is doing wonders for my misanthropy
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet
Yes, there is a hazard - the arraogant basterd of the oncoming bike that thinks the road is their reserved racetrack?
And as far as entrapment goes - there's no guarantee that the "speed 'trap'" will be visible anyway... try buying a radar detector and seeing where they hide; try to outfox a laser gun when the cop has discretion to NOT ping vehicles they consider to be not at risk, but sample those they do.
Best suggestion - if he wants to "play" tag with PC Plod in the world of illegal speeds, get a radar detector - better still, go to more track days?
Les, this really saddens me. I ride daily, do about 200kms a week on average... I will "tip my hat" to other road users - always have - but I won't warn of police stop points etc unless I consider them to be either road hazard in themselves (bad positioning) or creating one (backlog). They are there to protect me as well as everyone else, and you want their help in crashes/emergencies as well - you take the good with the bad. That you don't consider me "staunch" enough for NOT condoning the kind of riding that usually ends up the the papers with the headlines implying "suicidal rider tops himself again" with or without the byline of "takes innocent(s) with him" really makes me wonder what you want for BRONZ? Certainly makes me wonder why I should bother joining, and how anti-bike elements are going to use this attitude against all bikers if BRONZ is ever seen as the national "mouthpiece"?
I'm sorry - been getting back further into touring & group rides over the last 6 months, and IMHO a lot of riders need a lot LESS encouragement to their "exhuberant" riding style (wheelies, passing on blind corners, speeding, dangerous overtaking - all with zero tolerance for error, let alone bad roads) not any justification of righteous indignation that they're being persecuted by being forced to follow the laws of the land...
Advice to the original poster - get a radar detector, and start saving for the fines anyway - the laser gun will likely still get you - then you can do your own thing and not have to care if other people condone your speeds. Might also pay to get a GPS with an overspeed warning, so you can set it to warn you **just below** the overspeed that'll give you enough demerits to put you unlicenced, given any previous "problems"... that way you'll still have one last chance (unless you want to ride unlicenced & uninsured and sod everyone else?)
Good riding, all.
He who shall go stately at the back and not stress out.
So Gareth what was it you said about MaxF's "Funky ass curves"? - God, now I'm worried...
bling sent! though ya forgot the bit about go f**k yourselfs
or the generation that believes if your consisiously breaking the law then your ready to accept responsibility for it.
NOTE: there's also a law that says you cant warn people about police presence, so you're actualy bitching about people not breaking a law to aid you in breaking a law![]()
Slightly OT, but my business partner got a ticket last week. Po po was on Harper Avenue, and hidden behind a parked car. 62 in a 50. If a genteel, middle aged, very respectable and responsible gentleman can be heard to make statements such as "just bloody revenue collection" and "what road safety imperative was served here?" then I suggest that their efforts could be better spent elsewhere. But of course the police have no quotas (so the timing at just prior to the end of the week/month) meant nothing, and are only interested in safety, hence ticketing a vehicle driven by someone who could obviously pay, and would be unlikely to unleash any fury on the pleecemin concerned. Unlike, say, getting an unregistered, unwarranted piece of crap riding on its springs and inhabited by gang members off the road in Linwood.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
It isn't always obvious what other people on bikes are signalling. Waving/abusing/warning/whatever.
What we have here is a fundamental disagreement. There is no magic in speed. there just isnt. People get fixated on it because its so easily measurable and therefore easy to label. Oooooh 99 is safe but 101 is not.
What a load of crap. If I want to pootle alon g at 90, I will, if I want to go a bit quicker, I do that too. But I make my own decision about what I want to do, in the circumstances as I see them. Far out, thats what being a motorbike rider is about innit? Wild eyed loner on the last bike out of nowhere city, freedom etc? With freedom comes responsibility. Im happy to take responsibility for what I do. And did. Last time I got ticketed (122 in a 100) I stumped up didnt argue and even had a nice chat with the po po because he reminded me that I had failed to identify a road hazard. The road hazard being, obviously, the po po with a radar gun.
Get a life you bunch of sanctimonious pricks!
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks