Kight's lawyer, Roger Philip, told the court his client had reactive attachment disorder, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and had an extra Y chromosome.
However, a historic link between the extra chromosome and aggressive and criminal tendencies has been widely doubted, and the effects are said to be variable and often minimal.
see its not really he wee scrots fault ........hes just troubled thats all
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
How about Crucifiction?
A bullet is the cheapest option.... For the sicko who owns the dog. I adopted a 6 month old puppy from the SPCA & she has turned into a stunning dog, a pit bull. She is the softest dog I have ever owned & is totally submissive to other dogs, including Yorkshire terriers. 50 fighting pit bulls were taken off that American football player, all had fought. 3 were put down, 47 re-trained & found homes with familys. Beautiful dogs, just like Staffies but they attract really ugly, cruel, small penised, dumb owners.
Best put this one out on the Firearms thread.
Genreally speaking, I am not in favour of the death penalty. Certainly the David Bain case is an example of why it would have been wrong.
However for certain crimes such as the Clayton Weatherston type crimes, where the murder is admitted and described however his mental deficiencies tell him that the murder is fully justified, then the death penalty may well be more appropriate as no amout of treatment could correct such a personality.
There are some horrific examples to sway the arguament but there are also some examples of where they could have got it wrong. The media does not help!
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Despite my earlier post i totally agree, unfortunately their seems to be no clear solution for crime & punishment. I have a rose tinted view that society has to change at it's core to minimise cruel & criminal behaviour. The human animal still has the instinct for dominance & violence so it wiil be a long time coming.
Simple, the dog gets the lead handshake (It's a bit like the golden handshake but a bit more sudden) and the owner gets locked up for say 5 years. There are dicks like these around watch out for them.
One of my aged neighbours was looking after their sons bloddy pit bull mut dog recently. My wife who is only about 56kg was walking our wee dog past the house when the dog jumped over the veranda and attacked her. My wee dog (He's a 11kg welsh terrier) got in the middle, latched onto the pit bull and held him off until help arived. Well Ted earnt all his vet bills and food for life that day.
The other dog got the lead handshake.
He is actually a stroppy little shit. I have had 4 dogs and Ted is the worst and by far the best.
Why not just start by cutting out the middle man and be rid of the do-gooders n tree huggers,a certain percentage of the fuck ups will take notice and change there ways,those that dont get the same treatment.Wishful thinking methinks theres a large portion of the work force in NZ that have there mortgage payments paid by pandering to the fuck ups needs and wants no matter what they must feel whilst doing so.
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks