all sv 650 bikes" pro twins" should of been left standard for racing. meant to be a starting class not one to spend lots of money on! thay went well in tim gibs competition years ago
all sv 650 bikes" pro twins" should of been left standard for racing. meant to be a starting class not one to spend lots of money on! thay went well in tim gibs competition years ago
Okay,
Each it entitled to his opinion, and I won't think anything less of you for speaking your mind....
However, the "Codgyoldracer" challenging for the lead (or is he defending it) in the F3 Nationals will beg to differ for one...
Yes, there has been a bit of a mess made with the F3 rules, BUT it is supposed to promote development.
In godzone it is a little dictated by the manufacturers releasing bikes of different sizes (or importing models of bike) to what they did 20 years ago...
So, the SV got shoehorned into another class of racing....
Just my take on it...
sorry talking about the pro twins
Okay, yeah...
Unsure how the rules have deviated since Tim Gibbs set up the class...
See there was no such thing when I used to be involved, then I went away for a while, came back, and they are what I see today...
I guess some changes were made to save costs, some made to improve performance, and some were made because the rules were simply too hard to enforce...
Don't know the full story...
I agree that they should have been left standard because if that was the case i would more than likely be racing protwins by now but knowing that once i buy a bike im going to be spending thousands of dollars makeing it competitive kinda puts me off at this point.
well thay could do 1 . 16.5 in the year 2000 at manfield with not the best riders with stock suspension so cannot be the bad!
Pro twisn shoudl be pretty mcuh stock.....like just tires, rear sets, and a new exhaust system, also with the bike stripped down, so if oyu want to race a modded 650 you jsut go to F3, ohlins shocks and stuff are jsut too mcuh....
Tim Gibbes never started the class,He had a rent a racer class with a surplus shipment of SVs supplied by Suzuki NZ,Cost was $500.00 per round or $3500.00 for the full series if I remember correctly(6 rounds).Funny thing was it ceased because only a few people took up the offer.
The Pro Twins class was introduced by MNZ and is currently in its 3rd year and yes your bang on the mark,It should most definitely have been a production class.
All this talk of bikes handling like shit and you cant race them is just plain bullshit,They race lawnmowers FFS and Ill bet you a penny for a pinch of dogshit,A standard SV650 would easily outhandle the twin shock TZ250b I rode back in 78 or any of the aircooled RDs and on and on it goes
Pro Twins arenot that bad I have one and it has everything in the rules and is for sale for 5500 so you dont have to go out and buy one and spend the money building one up as there usally are a couple up for sale at any one time,
I like the class as it is and the fact you have guys like Geoff Booth and that clearing off is because they are extremly good riders
Blindspott are back as Blacklist check them out
www.blacklistmusicnz.co.nz
my issue with pro twins AS IT STANDS is that it has had the effect of diluting the F3 feild.
6 PT and 6 F3 WOULD have meant a feild of 12 F3 bikes.
I argued from DAY1 that the PT rules get the bikes within spitting distance of F3 performance and handling wise.
My view is and always has been that a PT should LOOK like a factory bike(yes glass copies shoild be available for the plastics) and engine/exhaust mods should be ZERO with the simple exception of a replacement exhaust CAN. That the bike should WEIGH the same as a factory bike.
Then again I argued that a simple horsepower limit was all that was needed
I do think the suspenders should be allowed LIMITED modification or The $500 buyout rule should be applied
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
Heard they are using Hyabusa parts - I think their pistons.
I believe they should be stock standard - makes it bike against bike, not who has more money and can afford to put the goodies on it in order to have that advantage to win over others![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks