And what about harsher sentences for police assaulting citizens
http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times...h-woman-player
The whole contry is going mad!!!
Quote Jan 2020 Posted by Katman
Life would be so much easier if you addressed questions with a simple answer.
I know from experience that this is not a penalty issue but the application of that penalty in sentencing. Yes both assaults on civilians and police should BOTH be dealt with more harshly. Problem is so many get a slap on the hand with a small fine or community based punishment instead of any jail time. Way too little for the victim and not enough compensation either.
Jail terms need to be more than just set as maximums, but to be applied at a rate and measure that society expects, and no longer as the rule of precident has dictated.
The one that always has got me is how a dotty old JP still living in the 1960's can hand down a sentance with no law quals.
Yes i know this is a bit harsh on all JP's but when you see someone who has spent the night in hospital because of being bashed, have to sit through a court case and the offender getting 10 hours comunity service you see what a complete joke it all is.
Is that the same as training a dog - it doesn't respect you so you beat the shit out of it some more, so it will? Normally results in a cowed dog, that will bite you the first chance it gets.We lack respect, maybe this will help remind people.
Respect is something that is earned by your actions and is a 2 way street!
In WA there is now mandatory imprisonment for serious assaults on police and ambo's - but not on OAP's or other members of the community and this in the light of more and more dodgy policing over here......
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
What a load of bollocks.
Of course police should be able to go to work without being bashed or killed.
But so should dairy owners, taxi drivers and everyone else, who actually die much more regularly than policemen.
The difference is ...
The policeman is trained
The policeman has a baton, pepper spray, a taser, often a firearm and handcuffs
The policeman will be backed up by other policemen.
Joe Citizen in his bottle store has none of that, in fact he's not allowed to have any self defence tools.
And the G'mint will conclude that the solution to murders in suburban bottle stores is to close the bottle stores.
The penalties for crime should depend on the circumstances, and the amount of violence. Not on who gets the bash.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
These points are missed by most people, well said, if you apply simple logic, the solutions are more easily brought about, we all need protection at times and it should not matter whos who,
a system way out of ballance favours its own at the expense of those it should serve thats my quote for today
keep up the good work Mr Reid
pedro
You overlook the fact that it is a police officer's duty to actively put himself in the way of harm. The average citizen - cabbie, shopkeeper - can rightfully run away, they aren't employed to intervene in assaults and criminal behaviour. Ambulance and firefighters also put themselves in dangerous situations to save people. Sometimes they get assaulted by angry friends of people on the scene - they should be recognised by the law for the extra risk they face.
A few years ago ambos etc were physically prevented from working on a two vehicle accident scene involving a Mongrel Mob car. The Mob guys were pissing on the bodies of the people (non-Mob) in the other car.......
. “No pleasure is worth giving up for two more years in a rest home.” Kingsley Amis
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks