"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
bit of an open ended question isn't it, efficiency as in total work in / total work out doesn't really apply as your food has to be grown before it is 'picked', whereas oil is out there ripe for the 'picking' as is
bottom line is its humans that are overusing all the resources, doesnt matter how efficient your shit is, too many is still too many.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
a normal engine isn't fighting 40bar except for when it's producing power. their one goes from two cylinders pumping and producing power, to (effectively) three with two fighting a very high head, being driven by only one!
without the reservior it's just an exercise in reducing efficiency
it would be an interesting project if it made the bike better.
in my view, it didn't, and they're going to be ripping off the 40 customers who buy these bikes....
maybe i just don't like ducati motors, if they did it to my favourite V4 and did a fair power comparison i'd still have a go at them for ruining a perfectly good V4....
or rather too much is too much; americans/australians use far more per capita than other developed nations (we aren't that good ourselves, mind you).
biggest irony in energy efficiency is that it results in higher overall energy consumption. it's kinda like how having more shelves just means you find more stuff to fill it - using less energy just gives you more money to spend on other ways to consume energy or use the more efficient device in a more wasteful way.
ie not turning energy efficient bulbs off because "it still works out cheaper" and using the money you saved to go do a coro loop instead![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Actually it is all a solar cycle. Oil also is biomass that was grown and is in effect 'stored' solar energy.
My point is that methods of transportation seldomn get an apples/apples comparison
Your closing staement is well intentioned but a generalisation. Poor position for as engineer to take when trying to strike the death blow
my point was that its too hard to do a proper comparison, you asked the question so kinda renders your point confusingi'm also confused by the 'death blow' thing, I am an engineer, but an unbiased one who calls it how he sees it.
Unless of course you weren't refering to my post in which case, or even if you were, quote button is good![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I realise that because there are so many variables the question is difficult.
Have you ever wondered tho? Or is all human energy considered 'free'
its considered renewable, which is important for the greenies. And more interesting than trying to figure out the relative efficiencies is considering the implications
meh, i need a diversion from trying to get my link geometry to work, tis not going well![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Very simple actually - if you burn 100KCal of Diesel, you receive it all in 1 burst. Where if you eat it all, you use some and store the rest.
Very smart TDi does this to an extent, it has stored diesel, and only uses what it can depending on what it knows.
So does this make one better than the other - nope.
Efficiency is a wonderful thing - its absolutely fucking useless without a system.
Otherwise everything is 100% efficient as you should never lose energy, it just changes.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks