AMCC

[Billy]

On another note.... how many people did Simon Crafar take out in NZ??
How many riders has Nori Haga taken out??
Did any of these riders get treated the way Bryce has???
If Bryce's riding is that life threatening - why has no one answered my original question as to how many people hes taken out?
Even the initiator of this thread should at least answer the question?

Bagging you?Or correcting your misquoted replies??
Your question was answered in post 26 as pointed out a lifetime ago by Goblin.You remeber Goblin dont you?Shes the one you banned from the TRRS due to her dispute with one of youre associates.Did you get her side of the story?Was due process followed??Im sure youve heard the one about people in glasshouses throwing stones!!

I will not be posting on this thread again,As Ive given all the relevant information I have on the matter,If you require futher dialogue with me Mr Scrivener,I suggest you either ring me on 075745579,0212928400 or 0273857340,Or Email me direct at acrfibreglass@actrix.co.nz,

For further information pertaining this subject,Again,Jim Tuckerman 021725614 or Peter Ramage 0273580318.

Have a nice day

[scrivy]

Bagging you?Or correcting your misquoted replies??
Your question was answered in post 26 as pointed out a lifetime ago by Goblin.You remeber Goblin dont you?Shes the one you banned from the TRRS due to her dispute with one of youre associates.Did you get her side of the story?Was due process followed??Im sure youve heard the one about people in glasshouses throwing stones!!
You crack me up Billy. Yeah I know Kelly well. Sorry again mate, but I didn't ban her at all. She and I had a talk (cause I like the phone to talk to people - to get the factual information - so I can make an unbiased opinion all on my own) and she decided not to appear at the TRRS due to reasons you obviously know about. So a due process was followed Billy - it's called communication!! Did I ban her from appearing too?? No!!



I will not be posting on this thread again,As Ive given all the relevant information I have on the matter,If you require futher dialogue with me Mr Scrivener,I suggest you either ring me on 075745579,0212928400 or 0273857340,Or Email me direct at acrfibreglass@actrix.co.nz,

For further information pertaining this subject,Again,Jim Tuckerman 021725614 or Peter Ramage 0273580318.

Have a nice day

What other mistruths will you now try to dredge up to inflict a shame and discredit on me from KB??
and yes, that is my name - what was yours again?

It really is a sad day if anybody has a differing opinion about MNZ, that you get personally attacked on KB.

[jasonu]

]

________________________________________

[Drew]

]

________________________________________

That's a mighty fine post indeed. Best in the thread.

[Pussy]

That's a mighty fine post indeed. Best in the thread.

It was VERY subtle.....

[Drew]

It was VERY subtle.....

Indeed, I nearly missed the meaning entirely.

[Tony.OK]

Indeed, I nearly missed the meaning entirely.

If you look at the deeper meaning to the post, one will see the symbolic effect of only posting half of a set of parenthesis, and in fact by only leaving the latter half ie- the closing half, then it would suggest to the avid subscriber to said "thread" that perhaps the author is in fact saying that perhaps the subject should be closed.

Well thats how I read it anyway

A simpler reason some might say is that it wasn't deleted properly, but this is KB after all so the easiest answer is normally the wrong one

[Drew]

If you look at the deeper meaning to the post, one will see the symbolic effect of only posting half of a set of parenthesis, and in fact by only leaving the latter half ie- the closing half, then it would suggest to the avid subscriber to said "thread" that perhaps the author is in fact saying that perhaps the subject should be closed.

I drew (no pun intended) the same conclusion. And was further compelled to read the meaning from the well defined "line", serving both the pre-requisite ten characters, and a very end like tone.

Well done to the author indeed.

[jasonu]

That's a mighty fine post indeed. Best in the thread.

Get stuffed.
I posted something and later decided to withdraw it. I couldn't see how to remove it completely so this was the best I could do.

[Drew]

Get stuffed.
I posted something and later decided to withdraw it. I couldn't see how to remove it completely so this was the best I could do.

This post is no where near as fun as your last one. Party pooper.

[scrivy]

I thought it was more a line in the sand..........

[Biggles08]

A lot of information and miss-information has been posted about on here from both sides of the argument, and its all pretty irrelevant to the issue. The ONLY issue I was trying to point out was the seemingly lack of consultation with the party DIRECTLY INVOLVED!

The very basis of the democracy system we all supposedly live in is the basic right to hear both sides of the story BEFORE making a judgment on the guilt and punishment of ANYONE accused. This is for EVERY case no matter how obvious you think the outcome will be. Had MNZ made a phone call informing Bryce that they were investigating a possible breach of his 'probation period' and wanted to hear his version of events, I for one would feel a lot better about the final outcome of his suspension for 6 months. All the background involved in he said, she said is not the point...don't try to justify actions taken (or not taken) by confusing the basic issue that the Meads were not given a chance to voice their side of the story...fullstop! This is classic case of dictating to the peasants "You will do as your told without a voice!" which makes me think maybe a riders union or similar might be a good idea...

[Quasievil]

Was it anything to do with the fact he was the only rider in 600 Stocks also??

Seems to me that if he wasnt given the chance to discuss it with MNZ etc before his "phone call" then I reckon its kinda rank

[jasonu]

This post is no where near as fun as your last one. Party pooper.

That is because I am not a fun person.

[scrivy]

A lot of information and miss-information has been posted about on here from both sides of the argument, and its all pretty irrelevant to the issue. The ONLY issue I was trying to point out was the seemingly lack of consultation with the party DIRECTLY INVOLVED!

The very basis of the democracy system we all supposedly live in is the basic right to hear both sides of the story BEFORE making a judgment on the guilt and punishment of ANYONE accused. This is for EVERY case no matter how obvious you think the outcome will be. Had MNZ made a phone call informing Bryce that they were investigating a possible breach of his 'probation period' and wanted to hear his version of events, I for one would feel a lot better about the final outcome of his suspension for 6 months. All the background involved in he said, she said is not the point...don't try to justify actions taken (or not taken) by confusing the basic issue that the Meads were not given a chance to voice their side of the story...fullstop! This is classic case of dictating to the peasants "You will do as your told without a voice!" which makes me think maybe a riders union or similar might be a good idea...

Having known the Meads family for about 20 years, after getting off the phone to them, I can tell you, there was NO dialogue with them before ringing them to say Bryces licence was suspended!
That is about as dispicable as you can get. Not to mention a breach of Bryce's confidentiality.

That is exactly the point I was trying to get through Biggles. Absolutely no dialogue!