AMCC

[Biggles08]

That is exactly the point I was trying to get through Biggles. Absolutely no dialogue!

I agree...that is the whole issue...not the result of the suspension....he may deserve it, he may not...a fair hearing of both cases is the only way to truly know.

[scrivy]

I agree...that is the whole issue...not the result of the suspension....he may deserve it, he may not...a fair hearing of both cases is the only way to truly know.

Actually, where in the MNZ constitution does it say you can be on probation??

[Quasievil]

Sounds very political and back room dealing to me

[Drew]

That is because I am not a fun person.

Well then, I wont look you up when I'm next in Oregon then. Which could be a while, given that I've never been, don't have any plans to, and don't know anything about the state to entice me to make plans. Aside from all that, you're off the must visit list.

[Deano]

Aside from all that, you're off the must visit list.

But did you notify him that you were planning to take him off the list first and is there an appeal process that must be followed for this ?

[sidecar bob]

Bagging you?Or correcting your misquoted replies??
Your question was answered in post 26 as pointed out a lifetime ago by Goblin.You remeber Goblin dont you?Shes the one you banned from the TRRS due to her dispute with one of youre associates.Did you get her side of the story?Was due process followed??Im sure youve heard the one about people in glasshouses throwing stones!!

I think that one was fairly clear cut. It involved an assault which was investigated by the Police & the matter of her consuming Bourbon while competing at a meeting several months earlier, that one of the organisers was aware of.

[Deano]

I think that one was fairly clear cut. It involved an assault which was investigated by the Police & the matter of her consuming Bourbon while competing at a meeting several months earlier, that one of the organisers was aware of.

OMG - anyone else want to air others' dirty laundry while we're here ?

Did this really need elaborating on in public forum ?

[sidecar bob]

OMG - anyone else want to air others' dirty laundry while we're here ?

Did this really need elaborating on in public forum ?

Not really, but Scrivys actions needed justifying. Id rather not needed to do it.
The assault was on one of the TRRS crew, so reasonably justified.

[Drew]

Not really, but Scrivys actions needed justifying. Id rather not needed to do it.
The assault was on one of the TRRS crew, so reasonably justified.

I think he's pretty secure in his decision on that one mate. Was a questionable remark on Billy's part to make his point though.

This thread does a good job of illustrating that we should none of us, be saying what should and should not be happening, without knowing the full story.

Shit has come to light on stuff that really doesn't concern the general public, and is only gonna stir uninformed debate further.

[scracha]

I think he's pretty secure in his decision on that one mate. Was a questionable remark on Billy's part to make his point though.

This thread does a good job of illustrating that we should none of us, be saying what should and should not be happening, without knowing the full story.

Shit has come to light on stuff that really doesn't concern the general public, and is only gonna stir uninformed debate further.

Who's the party pooper now Drew?

[Drew]

Who's the party pooper now Drew?

Pfft, like a person making any sense would ever be listened to on here bro.

As you were.

[Drew]

Retraction time.

Re reading earlier posts, I was premature in saying that Billy's statement was questionable. I am in fact a hypocrite, disregard all I say.

[scrivy]

Pfft, like a person making any sense would ever be listened to on here bro.

Who's making sense...............?