
Originally Posted by
rainman
OK, perhaps my being rude was uncalled for - my apologies, it's been a shit day. Week, probably.
But my point is clear - this act will not eliminate child abuse, and I don't think it was ever credibly claimed that it would. It removes a (possibly over-used) defence for child assault - which is surely a good thing in itself? You're the one claiming it's the cure to child abuse (or it has no value).
And don't believe IQ tests too readily. I had a Wechsler test a few years ago. Very instructive.
This is an anti smacking law. If I smack my child in front of a police officer I can expect to be prosecuted under this law. Can I not?
I choose to smack my children, and that's my choice. My children also know what will happen if they complain. My children would rather be smacked on the bum for being way out of line, than lose their father.
The difficulty now is that I now longer in good conscience can teach my children to obey the law, because I apparently don't. I hope the moral guidance and example I give them will allow them to live happy lives despite this. For those on this site, and there are many, who don't believe in morals, I apologise.
Some things are worth dying for, living is one of them.
Bookmarks