
Originally Posted by
Tank
The thing is that most people who dont earn the exec salary - have no idea what the exec does or the skills that person needs. They can add (or lose) millions for a company. They can be the one that creates jobs - or ends up ruining a company putting 000's out of work.
Too true, but it is clearly not only about skills but also about who you know and how much bullshit you can spin. And there is not a lot of accountability for poor performance, in reality, despite what is claimed.

Originally Posted by
Tank
1 - only left wing nuts keep calling them Tories
My apologies, didn't think the term would cause offence. Conservatives, then.

Originally Posted by
Tank
2 - Im hoping that they will continue to improve the economy that was fucked under labours watch - as such businesses will continue to do better and be able to pay everyone more. So - nope.
Its not so bad if you are in that 10% - but then I've worked hard for it and do not think its something to be ashamed of.
No argument from me that Labour in the UK has made a right muck of things (and probably richly deserve the out-kicking that they will likely get come May), but that whooshing sound you hear is my point passing you at altitude.
Capitalism as she is practised today (so, not some ideal, ultimate laissez-faire version) tends to increase inequity in society. This is backed up by pretty solid data, as is the fact that greater inequity leads to poorer social outcomes (higher crime, etc). You may have seen the Dom cartoon the other day:

Quite nicely put, I thought.
In short, the rising tide does not lift all boats, and certainly not equally. The western dream is unsustainable, and definitely can't be scaled across geography and time. The claim that more market liberalisation will address this (that we need less regulation) remains to be proven, and indications are that it's a load of unmitigated bullcrap.
My view is that we've evolved a social and economic system that selects for sociopaths, and it will keep on entrenching the status quo until there is an external dislocation (environmental/resource), or a violent revolution (less likely because of dietary, entertainment, and disempowerment factors).

Originally Posted by
Tank
So - are you saying that they should be paid the same - or close to it?
If so - How do you make that work?
Cuba has a society that works fairly closely to this approach, and they have very good social outcomes (health, etc). Some rather obvious downsides to their approach, of course.
Redefining slow since 2006...
Bookmarks