I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
So, I take it you aren't going to ask the questions on my behalf?
Pity really, as I was interested in what they would give as answers, too bad that Religious Zealots tend to avoid the questions that they can't answer.
In reference to Jonbuoy's observations - I'll leave this here - see if you can work out which one you sound like (I'll give you a clue - its the lady who refuses to answer the questions that they don't like):
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Sure, everything is a matter of perception when it comes to value, but if enough people perceive it to have value and that number exceeds Demand - then we see the Value increase,
Clearly you haven't talked to Greenpeace then
Here's the answer to your riddle - which as you present looks superficially like a Catch 22, and for the purposes of my Answer - I'll assume that only you and I exist and I'll solve it with no extra Marbles created:
I've paid you back 10, I owe you one. I then use my Time and Skills to provide goods/services to you at a cost - lets say I fix your PC, and I charge you 3 Marbles (my rates aren't cheap). I then pay you back 1 Marble. I have paid you a total of 11 Marbles, my Debt is paid. Your net wealth is now at the 8 Marbles you have AND the 3 Marbles worth of services that you have consumed (in this case in the form of a working PC), I have 2 Marbles that I am free to spend as is my want.
Generation of Wealth 101 - Trading Time and skills.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Okay Last comment - apologies for the Multi posting.
What is hilarious is that from what Jin has written - we are at different ends of the Political spectrum - and yet, we both call your Snakeoil out for what it is.
Either we share a common delusion (which you will no doubt claim) or we share a common understanding, but by all means - keep avoiding the questions that you know you don't have answers for, it keeps reminding me of just how right I am and how wrong you are.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
See, I answered your questions relatively thoroughly. That you didn't like the answers, oh irony of all irony's, doesn't mean that they weren't answered and very much in context. As such, why would I continue the discussion with you where clearly demonstrated that you are clearly not gaining any understanding of RBE at all? The Parable of The Pub.
![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Your answer could be summed up as 'get more resources' which directly violates one the stipulations - so No, you didn't answer it.
When there is greater demand than supply - How does an RBE allocate resources that is not arbitrary and does not infringe on personal choice (without simply saying, we will get more resources).
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Sorry, where did I say get more resources? Think you're looking for your usual strawman exit.
Intelligently. Something you have demonstrated yourself incapable of by not coming up with a single group that should receive priority for resource. Tis dead easy. My kids can answer it with more than 1 group.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks