My first poll for the NZ public

[mashman]

What report?

And there's no such thing as a freehold house in France?

Taxes on some wealthy French top 100 pct of income: paper

According to what law can they assume ownership of my shit?

And the justice department can rule against the established law now, can it?

Sounds like more bullshit to me.

I've posted it before elsewhere, and tbh can't be fucked finding it again.

Who but the owner dictates who owns what?

If you only had a brain (in a wizzy of oz stylee)

Yeah? Try telling any industry that an economy without money makes for a limitless budget.

An RBE makes the budget zero, fool.

In the same way there's no such thing as 0% or 100%, yes.

If you only had a brain (in a wizzy of oz stylee)

[Ocean1]

Taxes on some wealthy French top 100 pct of income: paper

"a one-off levy last year on 2011 incomes for households with assets of more than 1.3 million euros"

I've posted it before elsewhere, and tbh can't be fucked finding it again.

Don't bother, it probably represents about as much relevance as the +100% tax thing.

Who but the owner dictates who owns what?

The law. But you go rant some more about thieving justice departments, it must be very therapeutic.

In the same way there's no such thing as 0% or 100%, yes.

No, no I'm afraid "no money" does indeed mean "no budget". Fuck all to do with %.

And you don't hardly need a brain to figure that.... oh wait...

PS: And there's no such thing as a freehold house in France?

[mashman]

"a one-off levy last year on 2011 incomes for households with assets of more than 1.3 million euros"

Aha... communism.

The law. But you go rant some more about thieving justice departments, it must be very therapeutic.

Not really, just explaining who the real owners of stuff are... and it ain't us whether you like it or not.

No, no I'm afraid "no money" does indeed mean "no budget". Fuck all to do with %.

And you don't hardly need a brain to figure that.... oh wait...

PS: And there's no such thing as a freehold house in France?

If you say so.

P.S. Doesn't matter what you call it, it's all state owned.

[Ocean1]

Aha... communism.



Not really, just explaining who the real owners of stuff are... and it ain't us whether you like it or not.



If you say so.

P.S. Doesn't matter what you call it, it's all state owned.

Well, socialism.

Again, the owners aren't who the law says they are?

And you've proved this all before but now can't be fucked?

Right.

[TheDemonLord]

Thanks.

First come first served. For those who don't get the cuts they want, tough shit. Exactly the same as your restaurant example. If there's no steak, there's no steak no matter how much money you have.

So, If I choose to work (and not stand around in Line) then I miss out on things that I want. If I don't work, I get to stand around inline for things I want - really selling me on the Utopian Dream.

Thus providing even less incentive for me to work....

Also I'm reminded of Stories (don't have the source) of African Warlords using people to stand in line when Free Aid is handed out, stockpiling it, and then either selling it, or using it as leverage to get people to do there bidding. I'm also reminded Spivs during Rationing in WW2.

As I said - non monetary corruption can be a dangerous and fickle beast.

[TheDemonLord]

Have you not managed to figure out yet that while competition may well result in excellence it can just as easily result in corruption?

What happens when you get excellence AND corruption?

Does it, by virtue of coming from a Corrupt source, Diminish it's excellence?

I mean this in a non sporting manner - suppose that there was a human acheivement - First Manned mission to Mars (hypothetically) - and it all went perfectly, and it transpires that the company that did something pretty critical won the contract by Corruption.

Where does your moral compass point? Mine, if the results are good, then end justified the means - and I'm happy. What does your outlook say?

[mashman]

Well, socialism.

Again, the owners aren't who the law says they are?

Much better description, glad you brought it up so I can slip out of TDL mode.

No. Not if laws can be ignored or overridden... which they most definitely can.

[mashman]

So, If I choose to work (and not stand around in Line) then I miss out on things that I want. If I don't work, I get to stand around inline for things I want - really selling me on the Utopian Dream.

Thus providing even less incentive for me to work....

Also I'm reminded of Stories (don't have the source) of African Warlords using people to stand in line when Free Aid is handed out, stockpiling it, and then either selling it, or using it as leverage to get people to do there bidding. I'm also reminded Spivs during Rationing in WW2.

As I said - non monetary corruption can be a dangerous and fickle beast.

Nope. You've still absolutely no understanding of RBE. By all means become a bludger then... I doubt your skills, and attitude, will be missed.

[TheDemonLord]

Nope. You've still absolutely no understanding of RBE. By all means become a bludger then... I doubt your skills, and attitude, will be missed.

You said the method of resource allocation where there isn't enough supply to meet demand is First come, First Serve - And I'm saying Fuck that.

Also - if my skills weren't missed - then why are skilled IT worked in such shortage in NZ?

Check Yo' self before you Wreck Yo' self.

[mashman]

You said the method of resource allocation where there isn't enough supply to meet demand is First come, First Serve - And I'm saying Fuck that.

Also - if my skills weren't missed - then why are skilled IT worked in such shortage in NZ?

The current method is first come first served for the same thing.

Shit logistics.

Lazy thinkin fuckin moron. You've obviously need to be spoonfed. No more... ignore list time!

[TheDemonLord]

No more... ignore list time!

Victory.

[Jin]

I was watching Hayeks road to serfdom and thought it represented these rbe nutjobs perfectly

[mashman]

I was watching Hayeks road to serfdom and thought it represented these rbe nutjobs perfectly

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, coz you know what RBE is... . Mind you, the vid did describe modern day quite well... and you vote to be led by someone don't you? . My thanks.

[Brian d marge]

I was watching Hayeks road to serfdom and thought it represented these rbe nutjobs perfectly

I have the book ..it's a tough read

sent for a divine source

[Voltaire]

What happens when you get excellence AND corruption?

Does it, by virtue of coming from a Corrupt source, Diminish it's excellence?

I mean this in a non sporting manner - suppose that there was a human acheivement - First Manned mission to Mars (hypothetically) - and it all went perfectly, and it transpires that the company that did something pretty critical won the contract by Corruption.

Where does your moral compass point? Mine, if the results are good, then end justified the means - and I'm happy. What does your outlook say?

I suppose for that plan to work you have to be the one who writes the history.

George Bush" the coalition of the willing ( aka us and the Brit poodles) get rid of Saddam, everyone loves us and all my cronies make some cash...what can possibly go wrong ..win win no"

Worked for dubya dubya 2 as the Victors wrote the history.