"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
That depends on the perspective. Abundance of raw material for example, can be good for profit; as the materials cost for a product would be low. On the other hand, abundance leads to competition, which leads to lower profits per 'item'. Similary for sustainability, short term profits come at the expense of long term profits when sustainability is discarded. Efficiency, now that is the enemy of a monopoly, not profit; in fact efficiency goes hand in hand with profit, by driving down production costs.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
while this thread is mildly entertaining, the Shorai one was so much better.![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Hold on to ur head ...its going to hurt.....
Abundance, Efficiency and Sustainability are, very simply, the enemies of profit. This scarcity logic also applies to the quality of goods. The idea of creating something that could last, say, a lifetime with little repair, is anathema to the market system, for it reduces consumption rates, which slows growth and creates systemic repercussions (loss of jobs, etc.). The scarcity attribute of the market system is nothing but detrimental for these reasons, not to mention that it doesn't even serve the role of efficient resource preservation, which is often claimed.
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
So to sum up Mashie ...( hope I have this right Mashie )
There are different point of detail but they share roughly similar points:
- Land shared between people with no title or ownership , eg Maori and plains Indians
- Shared means of production. Resulting in shared benefits of that production. ( a transport company in England where workers are shareholders of said company )
- Equality of resource sharing.
- common distribution of consumables / goods / commodities ( a fking big woolies )
- automation of the manufacturing process i.e. resources into semi-consumables and semi-consumables into consumables
- beyond the use of money, credit, barter, exchange, and all forms of interest bearing debt
- Removal of false scarcity
A move away from competitive behaviour to a cooperative behaviour - in order to overcome competitive behaviour or also the influence of pure greed,(shaming of persons that opt for a greedy individualistic Ideal ) Other ideals have to move up the priority list or in the common value system an example of this would be a proven example, Linux and the open Source community ( Android, Firefox web-browser ) In this example the Ideal of sharing knowledge in order to share the end result of a Operating system ....Though ....understanding where competition helps to sort out problems or options, and where cooperation is preferred in order to succeed
So, we would have a system of self imposed management of human and natural resources both locally and globally where the following happens:
- money is replaced by gratitude
- trading is replaced by gifting
- ownership is replaced by usership
in a way where everyone’s needs are met. This was the way Hunter gathers lived for thousands of years and have been reported to be the happiest most content people around
Stephen
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks