My first poll for the NZ public

**mashman** · 25th May 2015, 12:50

Originally Posted by Zedder

I appreciate your honesty.

And the murdering of dissenters?

Awwwwww... hugs.

For the third time, sarcasm. Let me gaze into my crystal ball aaaaaaaaand

For the fourth time, sarcasm.

For the fifth time, sarcasm.

For the sixth time, sarcasm.

lol.

**Zedder** · 25th May 2015, 13:15

Originally Posted by mashman

Awwwwww... hugs.

For the third time, sarcasm. Let me gaze into my crystal ball aaaaaaaaand

For the fourth time, sarcasm.

For the fifth time, sarcasm.

For the sixth time, sarcasm.

lol.

Hmmm, not convinced on the murder of dissenters bit, but bogan may want to respond.

**mashman** · 25th May 2015, 14:45

Originally Posted by Zedder

Hmmm, not convinced on the murder of dissenters bit, but bogan may want to respond.

Of course you're not convinced, you believe me insane and bogan to be of sound mind. Like I said, indoctrinated

... although I'm more than happy for bogan to post it on up there so that I can be 100% certain that it was indeed sarcasm. You might be waiting for a very long time for that mind.

**Zedder** · 25th May 2015, 15:26

Originally Posted by mashman

Of course you're not convinced, you believe me insane and bogan to be of sound mind. Like I said, indoctrinated

... although I'm more than happy for bogan to post it on up there so that I can be 100% certain that it was indeed sarcasm. You might be waiting for a very long time for that mind.

It's not really about the insanity. However, as I posted earlier, threats of murdering dissenters are not indicative of someone on the right path.

If I discuss something with you, it's totally different to discussing something with bogan as you have a somewhat skewed take on things that often defies logical reasoning.

**mashman** · 25th May 2015, 16:27

Originally Posted by Zedder

It's not really about the insanity. However, as I posted earlier, threats of murdering dissenters are not indicative of someone on the right path.

If I discuss something with you, it's totally different to discussing something with bogan as you have a somewhat skewed take on things that often defies logical reasoning.

Exactly. Odd I had to explain that it was sarcasm on more than 1 occasion then

.

Skewed lack or logical reasoning eh... ok then here's a question for you using my standard logic module. If the planet produces 1.5 times the amount of food that is currently required to feed the entire population, we have the transport to get that food to anywhere in the world at any given point in time, we have the fuel to power that transport, then, Why are there hungry people, let alone those dying from starvation? Skewed lack or logical reasoning? bwaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaa... is that what the indoctrinated are calling the truth these days.

**bogan** · 25th May 2015, 17:05

Originally Posted by mashman

I Am........

Yet you and your family still use money, just like me and zedder. So we are being the change just as much as you?

**Zedder** · 25th May 2015, 17:11

Originally Posted by mashman

Exactly. Odd I had to explain that it was sarcasm on more than 1 occasion then

.

Skewed lack or logical reasoning eh... ok then here's a question for you using my standard logic module. If the planet produces 1.5 times the amount of food that is currently required to feed the entire population, we have the transport to get that food to anywhere in the world at any given point in time, we have the fuel to power that transport, then, Why are there hungry people, let alone those dying from starvation? Skewed lack or logical reasoning? bwaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaa... is that what the indoctrinated are calling the truth these days.

The insanity jab was linked to the Jewish issue not the sarcasm claim. Your claim of sarcasm regarding murdering of dissenters, hasn't been confirmed or denied yet by others.

It's not "skewed lack or logical reasoning" masho, read my post again.

I haven't formulated any thoughts on the food surplus issue. Post up your theory, including links to info on the situation, and let's have a look at it.

**mashman** · 25th May 2015, 17:46

Originally Posted by bogan

Yet you and your family still use money, just like me and zedder. So we are being the change just as much as you?

Yeah, you are.

**mashman** · 25th May 2015, 18:00

Originally Posted by Zedder

The insanity jab was linked to the Jewish issue not the sarcasm claim. Your claim of sarcasm regarding murdering of dissenters, hasn't been confirmed or denied yet by others.

It's not "skewed lack or logical reasoning" masho, read my post again.

I haven't formulated any thoughts on the food surplus issue. Post up your theory, including links to info on the situation, and let's have a look at it.

Do you know what a womble is?

The "or" shoulda been an "of" in both cases. Not implied?

Retreating to detail already huh? 1 human being dies from starvation every minute of every day. It's actually measured in seconds. Theory you say?

I'll save you the time, it's not profitable. It really goes no further than that. Same story for a great great many things. All doable, just not profitable.

**bogan** · 25th May 2015, 18:06

Originally Posted by mashman

Yeah, you are.

Sweet, I've done my part then.

Now where did I put my cash cannon

**bogan** · 25th May 2015, 18:11

Originally Posted by Zedder

The insanity jab was linked to the Jewish issue not the sarcasm claim. Your claim of sarcasm regarding murdering of dissenters, hasn't been confirmed or denied yet by others.

It's not "skewed lack or logical reasoning" masho, read my post again.

I haven't formulated any thoughts on the food surplus issue. Post up your theory, including links to info on the situation, and let's have a look at it.

The claims of sarcasm would be denied by me, pointing out the context in which they were replied, with no alternative explanation forthcoming. Like if a sane person made a sarcastic remark, they'd follow it up with a more serious idea, or otherwise indicate the aformentioned sarcasm.

There is local food surplus, and food scarcity for sure. But no studies I have ever seen conclude there is a net surplus; or that we can easily transport it. As humans we do not manage population very well at all, poor food distribution may be symptomatic of that.

**Zedder** · 25th May 2015, 18:27

Originally Posted by mashman

Do you know what a womble is?

The "or" shoulda been an "of" in both cases. Not implied?

Retreating to detail already huh? 1 human being dies from starvation every minute of every day. It's actually measured in seconds. Theory you say?

I'll save you the time, it's not profitable. It really goes no further than that. Same story for a great great many things. All doable, just not profitable.

The actual phrase was "somewhat skewed take on things that often defies logical reasoning". So, a bit more than just "of".

And you want me to take you seriously?

**Zedder** · 25th May 2015, 18:40

Originally Posted by bogan

The claims of sarcasm would be denied by me, pointing out the context in which they were replied, with no alternative explanation forthcoming. Like if a sane person made a sarcastic remark, they'd follow it up with a more serious idea, or otherwise indicate the aformentioned sarcasm.

There is local food surplus, and food scarcity for sure. But no studies I have ever seen conclude there is a net surplus; or that we can easily transport it. As humans we do not manage population very well at all, poor food distribution may be symptomatic of that.

Thanks for that bogan. But there shouldn't need to be any studies about population or distribution etc cos mashman wrote it's only the fact it's not profitable that is the problem.

**bogan** · 25th May 2015, 18:50

Originally Posted by Zedder

Thanks for that bogan. But there shouldn't need to be any studies about population or distribution etc cos mashman wrote it's only the fact it's not profitable that is the problem.

Well he is half right, massive food transiting isn't profitable...