My first poll for the NZ public

[mashman]

I see what you mean, but that is forced donation.

Usual method are to leverage debt, but said island didn't have any, so I'm thinking they convinced them with explanations and shared understanding.

When looked at from the financial economy perspective, true, that's how it will look to many people. How many though? What a lovely question.

Like, we'll take some of your land or infrastructure or something that we deem to be of value enough, and we will reconnect you to the mainland and make you rich. that usual method?

The society forces its consensus onto the asset owner.

I believe many in other jobs will reduce their work output and/or increase their needs/wants. I know I would.

No. It asks for permission and if possible offers some form of recognition (new hospital/university/building named after them or something). If permission is not given and the "asset" is of strategic importance to the country, then I would imagine that said "asset" "owner" is a white muthafucka and that unfortunately, as can currently happy to your or my "stuff", the needs of the country must come first sometimes.

You mean you'd become a bludger?

[mashman]

Fuck, you guys are going to run out of tissues at this rate.

Fucksake don't tell them that. They'll get some delivered now, gah. They would have completely run out before thinking about giving us a break/going shopping for tissues... and I suspect some vaseline

[mashman]

As I wrote before, there was no argument. You need to stop reading so much into things mushman.

I thought it harsh, my bad.

[mashman]

And bogan to outline his utopia . . He may have done but i might have missed it

Resource Based Economy organically grown with community after community joining over no specified time limit. Quite possibly in order to allow many communities to try the same things different ways in order for them to find the most efficient ways of doing things for future generations and lmuch other cool stuff that goes whizz bang too.

Close enough?

[Gadget1]

Gadget, Zedder and Husaberg.

Maha will be along soon to join them.

Nah, there's only three so it must be you, musho and axhole. It's no good trying to include someone who's obviously not there.

[bogan]

When looked at from the financial economy perspective, true, that's how it will look to many people. How many though? What a lovely question.

Like, we'll take some of your land or infrastructure or something that we deem to be of value enough, and we will reconnect you to the mainland and make you rich. that usual method?



No. It asks for permission and if possible offers some form of recognition (new hospital/university/building named after them or something). If permission is not given and the "asset" is of strategic importance to the country, then I would imagine that said "asset" "owner" is a white muthafucka and that unfortunately, as can currently happy to your or my "stuff", the needs of the country must come first sometimes.

You mean you'd become a bludger?

See, shared understanding at work

Yes, that usual trade method, not coercion.

Which is a yes to forcing in some instances. In the same way that we are forced to pay taxes.

No, I mean that I value my work output and potential future work output at a higher value than the free market does.

Resource Based Economy organically grown with community after community joining over no specified time limit. Quite possibly in order to allow many communities to try the same things different ways in order for them to find the most efficient ways of doing things for future generations and lmuch other cool stuff that goes whizz bang too.

Close enough?

Yes

[Gadget1]

This may be what zedder and others have trouble with; you've left out the most important part, which is that the same apples come back after only (?) being washed and waxed; without mentioning that point it is just exports. And you didn't back up the and back bit other than showing that other people say the same thing you did.

I did.

Yep, mostly that bogan but even his post 986, wtf does all that shit about "airstrip one with the windmill and all" mean?

And he admits to posting while he's pissed as well. No wonder it comes out weird.

[Brian d marge]

Yep, mostly that bogan but even his post 986, wtf does all that shit about "airstrip one with the windmill and all" mean?

And he admits to posting while he's pissed as well. No wonder it comes out weird.

Try reading sometimes

[bogan]

Yep, mostly that bogan but even his post 986, wtf does all that shit about "airstrip one with the windmill and all" mean?

And he admits to posting while he's pissed as well. No wonder it comes out weird.

If I had to guess it would be a wellington reference as they have an airport and windmill.

But making us guess like that is a very inefficient and conflictive way to communicate.

[Gadget1]

Try reading sometimes

Try fucking explaining yourself better!

[mashman]

See, shared understanding at work

Yes, that usual trade method, not coercion.

Which is a yes to forcing in some instances. In the same way that we are forced to pay taxes.

No, I mean that I value my work output and potential future work output at a higher value than the free market does.

I'd hardly call it a shared understanding, but I can see why you might think it that way .

No, that's economic blackmail.

Absolutely.

Entitled bludger it is then.

[mashman]

Gadget, Zedder and Husaberg.

Gadget, Zedder and Husaberg.

Maha will be along soon to join them.

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa

[Brian d marge]

Try fucking explaining yourself better!

I typed as slow as i could and its not my fault you havent read


2 of the most famous books in the english language

[bogan]

I'd hardly call it a shared understanding, but I can see why you might think it that way .

No, that's economic blackmail.

Absolutely.

Entitled bludger it is then.

What I mean is we both understand why you think as you do; unless you were being untruthful or have otherwise changed your mind.

Not by the common definition, as there was no coercion.

Only if you continue to think in a financial sense. In a moneyless utopia there is no way to value one's work output, no way to measure how one's needs/wants stack up against it. So the term bludger is simply not applicable.

[Gadget1]

If I had to guess it would be a wellington reference as they have an airport and windmill.

But making us guess like that is a very inefficient and conflictive way to communicate.

Yeah possibly so bogan. He probably thinks he's clever doing it that way.