My first poll for the NZ public

[bogan]

It doesn't pay anything. R.B.E. is the incentive. Society will let us know what it needs and it will get implemented, because as you say, it really isn't that different in the way it runs to the current system.

It's necessary because those external influences will change the value that things are charged at internally.

But it does, you've said resource spending will be tracked, and measured per individual. You've also said overspending can lead to jail time, and that a person card (spending) can be cut off.

Ah, so the external price of goods affects the internal resource value. Great.

[Gadget1]

Your reading and comprehenison are pathetic. The guy wrote "paraphrasing" and "nearly textbook case" so, breaking that down cos your thick: paraphrasing means using different words and nearly text book means close to textbook and would need confirmation in the form of a formal interview. Incidently, I doubt he's into R.B.E which means he works for money. Oh dear.

Yep, it would be like getting a structural engineer friend to cast his eye over a building as a favour. No formal sign off expected or required etc.

[bogan]

Nah, all sorted by bogan.

What I'm here for bud

[Gadget1]

What I'm here for bud

All good as far as I'm concerned.

[mashman]

But it does, you've said resource spending will be tracked, and measured per individual. You've also said overspending can lead to jail time, and that a person card (spending) can be cut off.

Ah, so the external price of goods affects the internal resource value. Great.

Yes, but the individual isn't getting paid. Likely just us using different words for the same thing, as happens, but essentially the individual is valued, just not paid and that value is dealt with on their behalf by the system. Yes, the spending is the value that they're taking out of the internal economy, and if that is happening would you not want to know and potentially arrest the behaviour?

[bogan]

Yes, but the individual isn't getting paid. Likely just us using different words for the same thing, as happens, but essentially the individual is valued, just not paid and that value is dealt with on their behalf by the system. Yes, the spending is the value that they're taking out of the internal economy, and if that is happening would you not want to know and potentially arrest the behaviour?

Indeed, so what are they valued by? Equal for all? Ability? Need?

[mashman]

Indeed, so what are they valued by? Equal for all? Ability? Need?

They are valued by the program. The program can be as simple or as complex as consensus decides that it needs to be, so there may well be a need for some form of weighting to be used wrt resources that are "plentiful".

[bogan]

They are valued by the program. The program can be as simple or as complex as consensus decides that it needs to be, so there may well be a need for some form of weighting to be used wrt resources that are "plentiful".

So if the program decides we need more gardeners, they get valued at more? so have more to spend. What are the people who choose not to work valued at?

[Brian d marge]

What I'm here for bud

Im glad you fellas found a commonality

[bogan]

Im glad you fellas found a commonality

Speaking of finding things, have you found anything to back up your apple story yet?

[Brian d marge]

Speaking of finding things, have you found anything to back up your apple story yet?

Sent the source of the quote to you last night

[bogan]

Sent the source of the quote to you last night

Didn't get it. Can you post it here.

[Brian d marge]

Didn't get it. Can you post it here.

Private message

[bogan]

Private message

Nah I don't get those.

[Brian d marge]

Nah I don't get those.

Ok when i get home Ill resend
Im sure you will just love the document