Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Spam - Query

  1. #16
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Gremlin View Post
    The email address the email comes from can be faked, made up, etc. I could write the software necessary to send out an email appearing to be from anyone I liked.
    You don't even need to write software.. (which of course you will know..)

    C:\WINDOWS>telnet someserver 25

    Trying xx.xxx.xxx.xx
    Connected to server.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    220 someserver.com ESMTP Postfix (Ubuntu)
    helo dell01
    250 someserver.com
    mail from: madeup@bogus.com <--- ficticious
    250 2.1.0 Ok
    rcpt to: anyone@anywhere.com <--- ficticious
    250 2.1.5 Ok
    data
    354 End data with .
    subject line goes here
    Dear Sir,

    Please buy our spam!

    bye

    .
    250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 0327B406049
    quit
    221 2.0.0 Bye
    Connection closed by foreign host.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gremlin View Post
    I manage several private mail servers for companies, processing at least 1000-2000 legit emails every day, and spam would make up 80-90% of emails. Public mail servers would have a much higher rate of spam. In short Mom, getting the odd spam (less than 10 a day) is not too bad. If spam stopped existing... it would be great (and make my days a lot better).
    coughgreylistcough...

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,494
    Blog Entries
    140
    greylist has big downsides. We've found other people's servers are configured to try again in a few days, not 5-10 min. SPF records are great, if everyone was able to put hard fail records on their domains...

  3. #18
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141

    off-topic techie bullshit - don't read!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gremlin View Post
    greylist has big downsides. We've found other people's servers are configured to try again in a few days, not 5-10 min. SPF records are great, if everyone was able to put hard fail records on their domains...
    woh.. I see retry times of 15-20 mins. They should configure their server properly.

    Greylisting IS a pain though, business customers' new contacts are always delayed by 20 mins - that's just the way of it. Once they have emailed each other once, then it is all go, but not until. Still, the total lack of spam here is breathtaking. I don't tell them about the delay, and no one seems to notice it, and correspondingly no one seems to notice the lack of spam, but yeah 90% reduction in traffic, zero permanent failures, zero false blocks, and zero virus spam is pretty hard to turn down. If everyone greylisted then the bot writers would fix it, and we don't want that now do we.

    Of course, it is possible to whitelist all .co.nz et all inside greylist, and that does cut back the delays.

    Can the virus just use the ISPs' gateway to circumvent? Surely it could look up that information in outlook?

    edit: postgrey comes with loads of whitelisting already done, and its trivial to add your own.
    $ grep -v "\#" /etc/postgrey/whitelist_* | wc -l
    199


    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,494
    Blog Entries
    140
    grep? linux? ewwww

    .co.nz isn't nearly enough for me however. I work with .com, .net, .co.uk, .com.au, .co.jp etc etc every day. I manage most common TLD's as well (always amusing having a .co.uk, registered in NZ, managed in NZ, mail servers in NZ etc ). Also, best to not drill massive holes in your defence by whitelisting .co.nz, only takes one spammer to fake email addresses on that...

    A while ago, had massive problems with viagra/pfizer emails going right through. Put in a custom rule with great success... until a while later a client started dealing with Pfizer
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141

    more offtopic techie bullshit - do not read!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gremlin View Post
    A while ago, had massive problems with viagra/pfizer emails going right through. Put in a custom rule with great success... until a while later a client started dealing with Pfizer
    Thats why server-side greylisting is cool.. it's not about the content, it's about the relationship between sender and receiver. All the common stuff is whitelisted so theres no delay, but anything that has never been seen before gets the run-around just to make sure it's serious. 90% of spam doesn't even get to the server.

    On what month in the following graph was greylisting installed?


    *from http://users.aber.ac.uk/auj/spam/greyperf.shtml

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    People who bulk email jokes without BCCing are often to blame for the reasons DB spoke of - email address harvesting through worms on any of the recipient's machines and they have all the email addresses the email was sent to.

    If you set up another email address (most ISPs will give you at least 5 free with your account) that you never use, it'll never get spammed. So the spammers are not just brute force emailing random addresses.
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:16
    Bike
    A naked monster - just like me.
    Location
    Just outside your window
    Posts
    1,923
    Quote Originally Posted by DangerousBastard View Post
    Bullshit - do not read
    Seriously - you should have that as a header for all your post.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:16
    Bike
    A naked monster - just like me.
    Location
    Just outside your window
    Posts
    1,923
    Upshot - 'ol (as opposed to old ;-) ) Mom is techie light.

    Thus the simple answer is - just have your mail with a ISP that has reasonable spam filtering. They get 99% of it - but the odd one will always get thru. When they do - just delete them. It only takes a second.

    No need to do anything - no need to configure greylist, no need to run linux commands. Simple.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank View Post
    Thus the simple answer is - just have your mail with a ISP that has reasonable spam filtering.
    Xtra used to be fantastic. Then when it became YahooXtra it turned to shit. But now, after training it by logging into webmail to mark SPAM that made it to my Inbox and to retrieve email wrongly marked as SPAM it's back to being pretty damn good again.
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •