Yeah, I know![]()
Yeah, I know![]()
I'm becoming sexually aroused by reading this thread....
Be back soon, need some condoms!
-Indy
Hey, kids! Captain Hero here with Getting Laid Tip 213 - The Backrub Buddy!
Find a chick who’s just been dumped and comfort her by massaging her shoulders, and soon, she’ll be massaging your prostate.
Jeeze - you are a guy OK - you probably get aroused by bread baking...
But back to the original post, yes, kinda sad but lawyers don't tend to pick people likely to convict their client do they? And really, in the over all scheme of things at least you are dealing with an honest pervert... Much better than the sneaky sort.
There are some sad buggers out there.....
Ohhhh bread baking, get your rise on!
These things are not always as clear cut as they seem at first.
I have a friend who would be similar, aroused by violent rape, aroused by pedophilia, enjoys sado masochism, has trouble empathising with others...
BUT in defense
SHE was raped violently at a young age, was prescribed a cocktail of drugs by psychiatrists which left her confused and suicidal for years, became a drug addict in her early teens and most importantly she KNOWS AND ACKNOWLEDGES she has a problem.
In a situation like this she would definitely excuse herself at the beginning of the trial not after she has heard evidence.
The thing is that she does try hard to not do anything inappropriate but when met with revulsion and rejection if she talks about her problem and trying to cope with it has voiced things like "why do I bother people hate me anyway" Its easier to pretend it does not exist than to try and get help to deal with it at times![]()
i know people that live with media blackouts thesedays for these very reasons. no tv in house, car stereo but it never gets turned on, and doesnt read papers or magazines, only books.
gives faith in the jury selection process doesnt it?. anyone need apply, its compulsory service dont you know.
"I saw, I came, I conquered".
A jury of your peers,well considering the charge,the jury picked on the correct guy by sounds of it.
At least by admitting to the jury,it is probably good he was removed,how he could come(no pun)to a guilty/innocent conclusion whilst being in his "happy" space,means to me he is in no way able to take in the relevant info and make an unbiased decision.
Hello officer put it on my tab
Don't steal the government hates competition.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10649592
I'm surprised at how the juror got himself off, considering the circumstances.
Excuse me judge I just cracked da mean woody ay.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks