This happened May 2009 in Kandahar in Afghanistan,..apparently caused by a control malfunction.
Interesting how long he stayed with it before pulling on the Martin-Baker zero/zero !!
This happened May 2009 in Kandahar in Afghanistan,..apparently caused by a control malfunction.
Interesting how long he stayed with it before pulling on the Martin-Baker zero/zero !!
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
Shit that was cool, I guess from looking at it once the flames where around the cockpit he thought RIGHT TIME TO GO !!
Possibly not alot of fuel on board so maybe his original plan was to ride it out ? who knows
Ive run out of fucks to give
Only the British are classy enough to crash then eject.
Originally Posted by Mully
Pretty impressed how high it shot him. They must go off with a wallop
Here's the details on the ejection seat
http://www.martin-baker.com/products...--Harrier.aspx
Also here's a cool pic posted in the Daily Sun of the same "landing".....
![]()
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
If it shot him any lower the chute wouldn't have deployed quick enough to soften his landing. Concerns in that respect may explain why ge didn't eject till the flames were licking at him
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Guys in the fire trucks must have been wonderring what sort of bang bang stuff was on the plane as they got closer!
Originally Posted by Albert
Hot and high (elevation 3312 ft above Mean Seal Level), a heavy aircraft, big sink rate and "a bit late on the round-out Hoskings" Ptwaaaang.....
My favourite below.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I'm livin' the dream.
Insanely cool footage! Very rare to have footage of a modern fighter jet crashing and not exploding on impact. Shows just how solid the aircraft are, too.
I suspect he didn't eject earlier because although the seats will get you out alive at 0/0 as has been posted, they aren't exactly gentle on the human body: does seriously bad shit to your spine. I think if you're in three ejections during your career, you're no longer alowed to fly for health reasons?
Library Schooled
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
not sink rate - just a long time between v1 and rotate...
I used to work with a guy who was a flight engineer on the first of the Air NZ 747-200s. Full and heavy out of LAX for AKL on a 25 departure (over the sand dunes) - could be up to 15 seconds between v1 and rotate, then the radar altimeter would give a " 50' " warning as NZ1 Heavy limped out over the sand dunes.
I have seen the AN124 take off out of Auckland full of America Cup boats and watch it be only 500' above Manukau City on the climb out. they sit at the end of the runway at full power for 60 seconds prior to takeoff - if the engines don't fail in that minute, they probably won't fail on the flight, so they're good to go....
http://www.airliners.net/photo/0884074/L/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhDMQOGy_oY
Galaxy seems to rotate a little earlier http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldP5f...eature=related
74-2 using it all.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXkSQ...eature=related
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks